Shimano 105 FC-1056 cranks
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Montreal
Posts: 173
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Shimano 105 FC-1056 cranks
I have a set of old Shimano 105 FC-1056 double cranks lying around and I'm think it might be nice to stick them on my fixed gear as an upgrade from the stock FSA Vero/RPM cranks. Does anyone know how they would hold up in such an application in comparison to proper track cranks? Are they a suitable choice?
Also, what spindle length would I need for a 42 mm chainline my the ring in the outer position. I know I can measure but I was hoping someone could speak from experience.
Thanks!
Also, what spindle length would I need for a 42 mm chainline my the ring in the outer position. I know I can measure but I was hoping someone could speak from experience.
Thanks!
#4
Senior Member
I'm using an old square tapir 105 set of cranks on my beater fixed gear. I don't know if I'd call it an upgrade but they will work fine. I have a 113mm spindle with the chainring on the inside position. For the ring on the outside, 103mm sounds about right.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 420
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I just switched a set of FC 1050 cranks onto my Kilo TT instead of the Truvativs, I'm using a 107 BB and the ring on the inside and they seem great to me. The Q is wider and more comfortable with the added bonus of helping with the toeverlap. I'm interested in how the 103BB would work out.
#9
superpredictable
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 193
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I use those same cranks. They work just fine and seem to be of very solid construction. With a 110mm IRO BB (68mm shell) and the chainring on the inside the chainline is 42mm.