KMC SuperLite 1/8" chain: h/nh?
#1
partly metal, partly real
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Philadelphia.
Posts: 3,597
Bikes: Hummer H2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
KMC SuperLite 1/8" chain: h/nh?
Does/has anyone run the kmc 1/8" superlite chain?
If so, how does it run? Is it compatible with masterlink type links?
If so, how does it run? Is it compatible with masterlink type links?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Santa Barbara
Posts: 1,508
Bikes: SE Quadrangle, '82 Venus NJS, '03 Bianchi Pista, '86 P'sonic Mt Cat, Fat City Yo Eddy '91 + '93, B'cuda A2E, '86 Trek Elance 400, '88 Centurion D.Scott Expert, '88 Fisher Mt Tam (and no longer with me: SE OM Flyer, Umezawa/B-stone/Samson NJS)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
not sure on the master link questions. the 710 has a slotted plate master link.
the ride is great though, and it is a pretty and quiet chain in my experience (paired with a new EAI cog)
the ride is great though, and it is a pretty and quiet chain in my experience (paired with a new EAI cog)
#4
out of shape
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: va
Posts: 1,456
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
the 710s i just got in the post two days ago have a clip-type (three piece) master link. i don't know why the 710SL would be different.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 448
Bikes: 2000 Raleigh M50. 2006 Raleigh Rush Hour. 2008 Cannondale Synapse 6.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
i run a KOOL chain, not the SL. its smooth and quiet. it came with a masterlink, but i don't use it.
#6
MattFashion
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: lancaster, pa
Posts: 173
Bikes: 70's le Tour with brazed track drops
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
i absolutely love this chain.
however i dont use a masterlink, so i can't answer that part.
however i dont use a masterlink, so i can't answer that part.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 672
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
i think i might have to buy this. i currently have the chain with extra thick side plates, and that thing weighs a ton. grr
#9
partly metal, partly real
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Philadelphia.
Posts: 3,597
Bikes: Hummer H2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
i'm guessing you read the topic title and posted, instead of researching anything about the chain in mention (hollow pinned, drilled, reduced material on plates, et al).
does "hi i have a reading disability" exist on yrs?
does "hi i have a reading disability" exist on yrs?
#12
cab horn
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 28,353
Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 25 Times
in
18 Posts
If you like to run a decidedly non super "lite" chain and slow **** on your bike. That's the chain to buy.
Brooks 4 lyfe
Brooks 4 lyfe
Last edited by operator; 03-27-08 at 07:30 PM.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 192
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
This chain looks wonderful but I dont have a drop of advice for you.
#14
Worst mechanic ever
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 84
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I was reacting to the comments above. It's just stupid, buying a 'light' track chain, because it's lighter. And no, I don't have a reading disability. It's one of the few things i'm not disabled in.
My point: if you want a light chain because your current one weighs a ton, go find another hobby. Or buy a 10 speed chain. Track chains are heavy, and for a purpose. If you think the superlite chain performs better, okay. But at what cost? Don't believe all the marketing crap. I doubt you (or anyone) can feel a big difference. If you do, and i'm wrong, let me know.
If you think it looks cool, buy one.
#15
partly metal, partly real
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Philadelphia.
Posts: 3,597
Bikes: Hummer H2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
it's really not about cool.
here are two things i've learned in my (few) years of cycling:
1) 3/32" chains on a fixed gear drivetrain stretch faster than 1/8" chains
2) 1/8" chains are heavy. not unreasably so, but noticeably nonetheless.
i found out about a 1/8" chain which has its "unnecessary" portions removed. I put unnecessary in quotes, as i'm can't be sure that the reduced portions won't put it in category #1, hence my OP.
If this chain is both light and durable, it's not a bad way to spend 25 dollars. There's nothing contradictory about that.
here are two things i've learned in my (few) years of cycling:
1) 3/32" chains on a fixed gear drivetrain stretch faster than 1/8" chains
2) 1/8" chains are heavy. not unreasably so, but noticeably nonetheless.
i found out about a 1/8" chain which has its "unnecessary" portions removed. I put unnecessary in quotes, as i'm can't be sure that the reduced portions won't put it in category #1, hence my OP.
If this chain is both light and durable, it's not a bad way to spend 25 dollars. There's nothing contradictory about that.
Last edited by sp00ki; 03-28-08 at 05:26 AM.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,083
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
it's really not about cool.
here are two things i've learned in my (few) years of cycling:
1) 3/32" compatible chains on a fixed gear drivetrain stretch faster than 1/8" compatible chains
2) 1/8" chains are heavy. not unreasably so, but noticeably nonetheless.
i found out about a 1/8" chain which has its "unnecessary" portions removed. I put unnecessary in quotes, as i'm can't be sure that the reduced portions won't put it in category #1, hence my OP.
If this chain is both light and durable, it's not a bad way to spend 25 dollars. There's nothing contradictory about that.
here are two things i've learned in my (few) years of cycling:
1) 3/32" compatible chains on a fixed gear drivetrain stretch faster than 1/8" compatible chains
2) 1/8" chains are heavy. not unreasably so, but noticeably nonetheless.
i found out about a 1/8" chain which has its "unnecessary" portions removed. I put unnecessary in quotes, as i'm can't be sure that the reduced portions won't put it in category #1, hence my OP.
If this chain is both light and durable, it's not a bad way to spend 25 dollars. There's nothing contradictory about that.
#17
partly metal, partly real
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Philadelphia.
Posts: 3,597
Bikes: Hummer H2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
i should say, they have in my experience.
i agree that they "shouldn't" as the only difference between the two is the space between the plates, but this has been what i've found. i use a tool to check my chain every month or so; 3/32 has worn out substantially faster, so i no longer use 3/32 drivetrains. I haven't given it enough thought to explain why...
ED: has anyone else experienced the same? i don't want to be responsible for doling out bad advice.
i agree that they "shouldn't" as the only difference between the two is the space between the plates, but this has been what i've found. i use a tool to check my chain every month or so; 3/32 has worn out substantially faster, so i no longer use 3/32 drivetrains. I haven't given it enough thought to explain why...
ED: has anyone else experienced the same? i don't want to be responsible for doling out bad advice.
Last edited by sp00ki; 03-28-08 at 05:37 AM.
#18
Worst mechanic ever
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 84
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
it's really not about cool.
here are two things i've learned in my (few) years of cycling:
1) 3/32" chains on a fixed gear drivetrain stretch faster than 1/8" chains
2) 1/8" chains are heavy. not unreasably so, but noticeably nonetheless.
i found out about a 1/8" chain which has its "unnecessary" portions removed. I put unnecessary in quotes, as i'm can't be sure that the reduced portions won't put it in category #1, hence my OP.
If this chain is both light and durable, it's not a bad way to spend 25 dollars. There's nothing contradictory about that.
here are two things i've learned in my (few) years of cycling:
1) 3/32" chains on a fixed gear drivetrain stretch faster than 1/8" chains
2) 1/8" chains are heavy. not unreasably so, but noticeably nonetheless.
i found out about a 1/8" chain which has its "unnecessary" portions removed. I put unnecessary in quotes, as i'm can't be sure that the reduced portions won't put it in category #1, hence my OP.
If this chain is both light and durable, it's not a bad way to spend 25 dollars. There's nothing contradictory about that.
#19
partly metal, partly real
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Philadelphia.
Posts: 3,597
Bikes: Hummer H2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
yep. i ordered it (for my girlfriend). she rides daily, i'll let you know how it fares.