Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Junior Member dirtylittlecity's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    My Bikes
    Panasonic Conversion SS
    Posts
    16
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Your opinions on cranksets please.

    My current crankset is crapping out on me, so I need to get a new one. So I figured I would solicit some advice from you guys, get opinions on if any of these cranks are excellent, or should be avoided.

    These are what I'm looking at right now...

    http://www.benscycle.net/index.php?m...b510e2435df643
    http://www.benscycle.net/index.php?m...b510e2435df643
    http://www.benscycle.net/index.php?m...b510e2435df643

    If you have any other suggestions in the 75-110 dollar range, I'd be happy to hear them. Thanks in advance for any help.

  2. #2
    Senior Member SeanBonham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Louisville, Ky
    My Bikes
    Surly Cross-Check, 1983 Specialized Stumpjumper
    Posts
    483
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Get the Andel!

  3. #3
    Junior Member dirtylittlecity's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    My Bikes
    Panasonic Conversion SS
    Posts
    16
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Any reason that you endorse it so strongly?

  4. #4
    fails just as quickly thequickfix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    two miles behind
    Posts
    522
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The RD cranks have a weird chainline spec:

    Quote Originally Posted by benscycle.com
    Use with a 103 mm square taper bottombracket for a 45mm Chainline
    That would be enough to dissuade me.

    FWIW, the Andel cranks are basically the same as IRO cranks, which are plenty strong and durable in my experience (except for the chainring).
    Takin' the first bus out of Shell Town

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    413
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I got the chainline on the RD cranks to be acceptable (not perfect) by putting the chainring on the inside of the spider with a 103mm BB. The difference between the outside of the spider and the inside of the spider is, however, more than the required 3mm, so it's a small overcompensation, but within acceptable tolerances. If I get a chance to pick up a BB with a 107mm spindle for cheap, I might try it. That would move the chainline 2mm to the right, which, I suspect would bring it closer to perfection. This is mostly because, as a matter of principle, I want a perfect chainline, not just an acceptable/safe one. As it currently is set up (103mm BB, Chainring on the inside), it's fine.

    edit: I also like the RD's a lot. They're reasonably light (not weight weenie light, but light enough), tough enough and they have a very comfortable (for me) Q factor.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •