Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 44
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    31
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Reynolds 520 vs 631

    OK I've found a lot of information on the internet about CroMoly. Still, when it comes to track frames, which is the better, the 520, or the 631? Which is stronger, lighter, cheaper, etc?

    My understanding is that the Kilo tt is 520, and the IRO is 631. Alot of factors albeit, which one is choice?

  2. #2
    tinydr
    Guest
    Even I have to admit a little searching would answer this right-quick...

    631 is the higher grade tubing... 520 is the cheaper; do a google search and you can read to your heart's delight.

  3. #3
    stay free. frankstoneline's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Ellensburg, WA
    My Bikes
    EAI Bare Knuckle, 1980's Ross Signature 292s 12 speed
    Posts
    1,557
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I thought the kilo was 4130? Yeah, bikesdirect says 4130 frame and fork...
    xoxo David
    Quote Originally Posted by metaljim View Post
    katana's out frank! always be ready.
    <edited>

  4. #4
    Banned zelah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Portland
    My Bikes
    Mercier Kilo TT
    Posts
    2,536
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    same diff

  5. #5
    stay free. frankstoneline's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Ellensburg, WA
    My Bikes
    EAI Bare Knuckle, 1980's Ross Signature 292s 12 speed
    Posts
    1,557
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    is it? serious question. 4130 is same as 520?
    xoxo David
    Quote Originally Posted by metaljim View Post
    katana's out frank! always be ready.
    <edited>

  6. #6
    Banned zelah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Portland
    My Bikes
    Mercier Kilo TT
    Posts
    2,536
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i could be making it up but i'm pretty sure i'm not. it's either exactly the same or comparable

  7. #7
    Padovano Mike552's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    696
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by frankstoneline View Post
    is it? serious question. 4130 is same as 520?

    Yes. 520 is Reynolds branded 4130.
    *1987 Panasonic DX-5000/STI-9 *1983 Univega Gran Premio/STI-9 *1991 Bridgestone MB-2/Suntour XC Pro

  8. #8
    tinydr
    Guest
    I have to confess I might've gotten confused by the Bikeisland frames... those are definitely 520.

  9. #9
    stay free. frankstoneline's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Ellensburg, WA
    My Bikes
    EAI Bare Knuckle, 1980's Ross Signature 292s 12 speed
    Posts
    1,557
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by zelah View Post
    i could be making it up but i'm pretty sure i'm not. it's either exactly the same or comparable
    haha, yeah, you're right, I got unlazy and googled it and there happened to be a thread from the framebuilders forum. case closed.

    http://www.bikeforums.net/archive/in.../t-253635.html
    xoxo David
    Quote Originally Posted by metaljim View Post
    katana's out frank! always be ready.
    <edited>

  10. #10
    stay free. frankstoneline's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Ellensburg, WA
    My Bikes
    EAI Bare Knuckle, 1980's Ross Signature 292s 12 speed
    Posts
    1,557
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by tinydr View Post
    I have to confess I might've gotten confused by the Bikeisland frames... those are definitely 520.
    oh alright, the bikeisland site says they are 520, bikesdirect says 4130, being that they are the same alloy I would imagine in the most recent run of kilo frames 520 was cheaper, and became the tubing of choice.
    xoxo David
    Quote Originally Posted by metaljim View Post
    katana's out frank! always be ready.
    <edited>

  11. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    31
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by tinydr View Post
    Even I have to admit a little searching would answer this right-quick...

    631 is the higher grade tubing... 520 is the cheaper; do a google search and you can read to your heart's delight.
    true. i actually found that the 520/4140 is inferior to the 631. i guess i was asking if the difference was worth paying $150 extra. the angus is $150 more than the kilo tt. i've seen kids say get the tt or the iro, but nobody really gives a good explanation of why. i can't find a weight for the kilo anywhere. the iro = 3.9 lb. the steamroller = < 2lb. I'd rather spring for the stronger yet heavier (obviously thicker tubing) iro after reading accounts of cracked steamroller tubing. i'm wondering how well built and how thick the 520 is on the kilo tt. at the moment i'm leaning toward the iro angus. thoughts?

  12. #12
    Senior Member Ziemas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Riga, Latvia
    Posts
    10,076
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You aren't going to be able to tell a difference between 520 and 631; what you will be able to tell a difference between is the respective geometries of the frames. Pay attention to the geometry of the frames, not the tubing.

  13. #13
    stay free. frankstoneline's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Ellensburg, WA
    My Bikes
    EAI Bare Knuckle, 1980's Ross Signature 292s 12 speed
    Posts
    1,557
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ridingsu View Post
    true. i actually found that the 520/4140 is inferior to the 631. i guess i was asking if the difference was worth paying $150 extra. the angus is $150 more than the kilo tt. i've seen kids say get the tt or the iro, but nobody really gives a good explanation of why. i can't find a weight for the kilo anywhere. the iro = 3.9 lb. the steamroller = < 2lb. I'd rather spring for the stronger yet heavier (obviously thicker tubing) iro after reading accounts of cracked steamroller tubing. i'm wondering how well built and how thick the 520 is on the kilo tt. at the moment i'm leaning toward the iro angus. thoughts?
    As was stated above, look to geometry first. I think you would be hard pressed to crack any of those frames. The kilo is a pretty solid frame, I dont think you would have problems with it.
    xoxo David
    Quote Originally Posted by metaljim View Post
    katana's out frank! always be ready.
    <edited>

  14. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    31
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by frankstoneline View Post
    As was stated above, look to geometry first. I think you would be hard pressed to crack any of those frames. The kilo is a pretty solid frame, I dont think you would have problems with it.
    yeah i like that kilo aslso. i've been searching around this forum and can't really find a straight answer as to WHY one of the following frames is the better: kilo tt or iro angus.

  15. #15
    slot machine
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Richmond, Va
    My Bikes
    fuji and a Meteor
    Posts
    482
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yeah the new kilo's are 520.
    http://velospace.org/node/3511

    Hells yeah that's a quick release on there. In case I need to release it quick!

  16. #16
    Senior Member Ziemas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Riga, Latvia
    Posts
    10,076
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ridingsu View Post
    yeah i like that kilo aslso. i've been searching around this forum and can't really find a straight answer as to WHY one of the following frames is the better: kilo tt or iro angus.
    There is no 'better'. There is only better for you.

    In other words, what kind of ride are you looking for? What do you want in a frame? Unless you know this no one can give you any suggestions.

  17. #17
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    31
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Ziemas View Post
    There is no 'better'. There is only better for you.

    In other words, what kind of ride are you looking for? What do you want in a frame? Unless you know this no one can give you any suggestions.
    ok, currently i am riding a conversion that use to be a cruiser. it's a fun bike. what i'm looking for now is something i can lean forward on and haw some ass in the city. is there really that much of a difference between these two bikes? if so, maybe i need to just stick with my conversion until i know what i really want in a frame as you say. I thought i just wanted something light, that wouldn't break, and is comfortable. apparently theres more to it than that.

  18. #18
    %#&*#%>?% Build your own's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Mass
    My Bikes
    Pake,Shogun,Nishiki,Motobecane
    Posts
    845
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ridingsu View Post
    I thought i just wanted something light, that wouldn't break, and is comfortable.
    I wouldn't worry too much about weight.Any decent 4130 frame will build up light enough for riding around in the city.When it comes to different grades of tubing the difference is often so small that it matters only in competition applications.As for comfort,trackframes are far from "comfortable" in the streets.

  19. #19
    Blue Light Special kmart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Bay Area, Sunny Cali
    My Bikes
    '05 Felt F55, Schwinn Prologue road bike, '86 Centurion DS Iron Man, Sette Flite AM MTB
    Posts
    1,469
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Tubing is distinguished by several things: materials, cross-section, butting and wall thickness. That's why different manufacturers sell different tubesets made from the same material but call them "custom butted". Butting a tubeset is not an expensive operation, so customization options exist as different brands like Reynolds, Columbus, Tange even though the all use the same basic 4130 cr-mo stock.

    Straight gauge, single-, double-butted or triple-butting is what makes the biggest difference in frame weight. For example, the Kilo TT frame is double-butted, while the Schwinn Madison is straight guage (hence it is much heavier). Not sure, but I think the Pake frame is also single-butted since it also reputed to be on the heavy side (correct me if I'm wrong).
    Quote Originally Posted by KrisPistofferson View Post
    racer x flies across cobblestones with a grimace of determination, three feet of seatpost, bars level with ankles, carbon fiber frame with Kryptonite lugs and a millimeter clearance between the fork and the 700x21c tires. This gives everyone a *****

  20. #20
    ALL PARTY ryansexton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Niagara Falls, Ontario, Canada
    My Bikes
    Douglas Touring Cross Wise, Urbanite Fixed Gear
    Posts
    664
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I can't imagine breaking a frame in normal conditions. Trains, Planes, Cars, and Fixed gear skydiving, though.
    Quote Originally Posted by crushkilldstroy View Post
    This is SSFG. Nothing is logical here.

  21. #21
    here come rome plows's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    winter park, fl
    Posts
    10
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by kmart View Post
    Straight gauge, single-, double-butted or triple-butting is what makes the biggest difference in frame weight. For example, the Kilo TT frame is double-butted, while the Schwinn Madison is straight guage (hence it is much heavier). Not sure, but I think the Pake frame is also single-butted since it also reputed to be on the heavy side (correct me if I'm wrong).
    FYI, the Madison is double butted. (From the Schwinn website: "Schwinn Custom track frame w/ N'Gauged Double Butted Cr-mo main tubes and 6mm thick horizontal dropouts.") I'm also not terribly convinced the frame alone weighs any more than the Kilo TT, at least from my experience with the two. It's more due to some of the crap components that you end up with a heavier build out the box.

    Anyway, you're on the money with the butting thing apart from that.

  22. #22
    . bbattle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Rocket City, No'ala
    My Bikes
    2014 Trek Domane 5.2, 1985 Pinarello Trevisio, 1991 Colnago Master, '06 Bianchi San Jose, 1987 Moulton Fuso, 1990 Gardin Shred, '82 John Howard(Dave Tesch)
    Posts
    11,983
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    From Reynoldsusa.com,

    Reynolds 631 - cold drawn
    UTS: 52 - 58 Tsi, 115 - 130 Ksi,
    800 - 900 MPa

    Following on from the success of 853, Reynolds have added 631 to the range of AIR HARDENING STEEL tube sets. This seamless cold drawn steel tube will allow the benefits of this new steel to be used in the manufacture of a wide range of frames and is now considered a worthy successor to our legendary 531 tubing. Like 853 it is suitable for TIG welding and brazing and in the heat affected joint areas will gain strength, to ultimate tensile strengths in excess of heat treated chrome molybdenum. The strength to weight ratio of 631 is equal to that of many aluminium frames, and it has an excellent fatigue life whilst providing a supple ride quality suitable for long distance events.

    On road and touring frames we suggest 631 or 525 forks be used in conjunction with 631 frames. As 631 is only available in main frame tube sizes, we recommend the use of either heat treated CrMo (725) or cold drawn CrMo (525) seatstays and chainstays to complete the frame."

    520 is Reynolds 4130. Butted and TIG weldable.

  23. #23
    Tell them I hate them Peedtm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Boise, ID
    My Bikes
    Specialized Allez Epic '91, IRO Mark V Pro, Schwinn Traveler
    Posts
    939
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by kmart View Post
    Tubing is distinguished by several things: materials, cross-section, butting and wall thickness. That's why different manufacturers sell different tubesets made from the same material but call them "custom butted". Butting a tubeset is not an expensive operation, so customization options exist as different brands like Reynolds, Columbus, Tange even though the all use the same basic 4130 cr-mo stock.

    Straight gauge, single-, double-butted or triple-butting is what makes the biggest difference in frame weight. For example, the Kilo TT frame is double-butted, while the Schwinn Madison is straight guage (hence it is much heavier). Not sure, but I think the Pake frame is also single-butted since it also reputed to be on the heavy side (correct me if I'm wrong).
    You seem to use single butted and straight gauge interchangeably. Single butted tubes are also butted, just one end of the tube only. straight gauge as the name implies is just that.
    If you want to know about Tarck Bikes, PM me.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  24. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    685
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    what's the use in making single butted tubes?
    Quote Originally Posted by andre nickatina View Post
    the guy must have been like holy ****? this kid on a fixie is killin it without engine motors.

  25. #25
    Tell them I hate them Peedtm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Boise, ID
    My Bikes
    Specialized Allez Epic '91, IRO Mark V Pro, Schwinn Traveler
    Posts
    939
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ^^^seat tubes
    If you want to know about Tarck Bikes, PM me.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •