Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 19 of 19
  1. #1
    Senior Member theetruscan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    386
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Are track parts mostly heavy?

    I don't really worry about it (I store enough beer in my gut to negate any bicycle weight savings I'll ever see), but I was surprised when I weighed my new singlespeed.

    It has reasonably nice parts, kind of the basic nice but not crazy flashy setup.

    I was expecting it to come out to something around 20 pounds built up. It was just a touch under 24 lbs before I tossed on my rack. Is that normal, or is my bike outside the norm for singlespeeds?

    The frame is roughly a 63 (custom, so that's just from measuring it haphazardly myself)

  2. #2
    :jarckass: deathhare's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Nashville
    Posts
    6,563
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by theetruscan View Post
    Are track parts mostly heavy?

    Not really. Depends on what you got.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Gordo789's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Ithaca, NY
    Posts
    212
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm assuming the bike is steel, so depending on your parts it could easily be 24 lbs. With an aluminum bike you might want to worry a little.
    All monkey no wrench.
    2006 Felt F90
    2007 IRO Mark V Group Buy

  4. #4
    Senior Member theetruscan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    386
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Gordo789 View Post
    I'm assuming the bike is steel, so depending on your parts it could easily be 24 lbs. With an aluminum bike you might want to worry a little.
    It's a 63ish cm (center to center) lugged steel frame.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Gordo789's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Ithaca, NY
    Posts
    212
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by theetruscan View Post
    It's a 63ish cm (center to center) lugged steel frame.
    yeah, you could easily be up at 24 lbs. I saw some fixies in bicycling magazine lately that were pushing 19lbs for aluminum and 22 lbs for steel at smaller sizes (like 56 I think), so if your bike is pretty big, this is not abnormal. I would try not to think about it since in the end a few pounds wont make a difference if you're not at your ideal weight yourself.
    All monkey no wrench.
    2006 Felt F90
    2007 IRO Mark V Group Buy

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,299
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    63 is BIG, but 24lbs still sounds high. can't do much about the frame...wheels/tires are 2nd on the list.

    my 52cm steel fixed-gear is right at 16lbs, without crazy ultralight measures. that 8lb difference isn't all in the frame size...
    Last edited by dookie; 06-23-08 at 08:16 PM.

  7. #7
    Gears? CliftonGK1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    My Bikes
    '08 Surly Cross-Check, 2011 Redline Conquest Pro, 2012 Spesh FSR Comp EVO, 2009 Spesh Singlecross, 2011 RM Flow1
    Posts
    11,304
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    At 63cm that's nothing to be surprised about, especially if you have a sturdy (heavy) wheelset on there. I weighed 22 pounds for mine, and it's a shade on the small side for me. I won't be surprised if I top 23-25 pounds with my next build up (on a 62cm Rob Roy.)

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    GA
    Posts
    5,317
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Track stuff is heavy compared to road stuff.
    Hipster stuff is even worse.

    24lbs is more than my crosscheck. How accurate is that weight.

  9. #9
    Senior Member powerband's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    763
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by dookie View Post
    63 is BIG, but 24lbs still sounds high. can't do much about the frame...wheels/tires are 2nd on the list.

    my 52cm steel fixed-gear is right at 16lbs, without crazy ultralight measures. that 8lb difference isn't all in the frame size...
    dookie, what is the make of your steel frame and what kind of components are on your bike, that it weighs in at a light 16 lbs.?

    Thanks.
    Go Hard

  10. #10
    not actually Nickatina andre nickatina's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    OR
    Posts
    4,447
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It depends on what part and what era it came from. High flange track hubs are notoriously heavy compared to most modern road hubs. Same with steel track bars / steel stems. But these days, modern aluminum/carbon track frames are pretty damn light. Old school tubular wheelsets tend to be super light. New school wheelsets may or may not be heavier: Mavic Ellipses are pigs compared to road stuff at 2000g, but American Classic 420's are more like 1500g. Disc wheels aren't light but weight is not the concern there. Cranks, don't think they differ much from Al road counterparts...

    It's been repeated ad nauseum, but on the track, weight is not the top concern. Stiffness, and depending on the event, aerodynamics, are more important.

    Apart from your frame, look at the wheels. Deep V's, straight gauge spokes and HF hubs will weigh down an otherwise decently light setup.

  11. #11
    loves his IRO. eXCeSS's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Downtown Albany
    My Bikes
    IRO Angus, all sorts of upgrades.
    Posts
    471
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    53 iro angus with an anchorspoke and a dp18 (another anchor) as the wheelset comes in at a cool 18.5

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Stevens Point/Milwaukee, WI
    Posts
    440
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by theetruscan View Post
    (I store enough beer in my gut to negate any bicycle weight savings I'll ever see)
    +1

  13. #13
    Senior Member theetruscan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    386
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    As I'd said, I wasn't so much worried as confused.

    I'm running Fusions for durability, deep vs seemed overkill and I don't like the look. The spokes are doublebutted, but there are 36 of them, laced to Paul hubs.

    I think I figured out why I was coming up so confused about weight though, it was just something dumb. I was figuring weight without counting pedals or giant stainless steel gilles berthoud fenders. That right there should be the 3 pound difference I was missing.
    Last edited by theetruscan; 06-23-08 at 08:58 PM.

  14. #14
    Senior Member filtersweep's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    2,615
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    What weighs so much? I am riding a lugged old steel (Tange) conversion running a brake and a super-deep Vento and it comes in at 17... and I couldn't make it heavier if I tried. If I threw on my tubulars, it is probably a 16.5er.

    Quote Originally Posted by Gordo789 View Post
    I'm assuming the bike is steel, so depending on your parts it could easily be 24 lbs. With an aluminum bike you might want to worry a little.

  15. #15
    not actually Nickatina andre nickatina's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    OR
    Posts
    4,447
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ^What method did you use to weigh?

  16. #16
    Senior Member cizzlak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    SE Wisconsin
    My Bikes
    1994 Trek 1200, 1984 Raleigh Prestige, 1980 Motobecane Grand Jubile, custom 531 track, and a bunch of tinker bikes of all type
    Posts
    280
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    bathroom scale method puts my 531 tarck bike at 19lbs. its 59cm c-c with aluminum nitto junk on it. no carbon anywhere, guarantee my 531 fork weighs 3-4 pounds (im pretty sure when you strip any bike down to the frameset, outside of the worst alloys ever, the fork always outweighs the rest of the frame by a long shot). have never had it properly weighed, but a friend just today told me i can bring my bikes to his workplace that has a big floor scale for shipping/filling drums with chemicals, and its very accurate. we shall see. and no, i dont put any stock in the bathroom scale method. just felt like sharing.

  17. #17
    IRL Banhammer idiq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    RVA
    My Bikes
    Trek T1, Koga Track, Bridgestone 550, Fuji Cross Pro, Trek 2300, Trek 2500, BMC Streetfire w/ 10s Record, Columbia Tandem, Schwinn Prologue
    Posts
    670
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    15lbs, aluminum.
    saddle sores bike club | prepare to be rode

  18. #18
    aka mattio queerpunk's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    5,323
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by theetruscan View Post
    The frame is roughly a 63
    you've found your culprit.
    the hipster myth.

    i practice vagabondery.

  19. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,299
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by powerband View Post
    dookie, what is the make of your steel frame and what kind of components are on your bike, that it weighs in at a light 16 lbs.?

    Thanks.
    major parts: jamis sputnik frame (631), wound-up fork, cane creek volos wheels (cc hubs w/aerohead rims, 24/28), centaur road double w/miche ring & 1/8" drivetrain...also brakes (2 x tektro levers, 1 x campy caliper).

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •