Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

View Poll Results: Track Frame or Converted Road Frame?

Voters
75. You may not vote on this poll
  • FIXED GEAR Track Frame

    43 57.33%
  • FIXED GEAR Conversion

    32 42.67%
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 104
  1. #1
    One skid from blown knees bigbris1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    910
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Fixed/Track Frame or Conversion?

    Which do you prefer for FIXED GEAR cycling? I know there are a large number of folks that have converted road frames to fixed gear. I believe they have done this due to:

    1. Cost (cheaper to convert a frame you already had, or bought for less than a new track frame)
    2. Frameset (Some have nice frames, but want to go FG so they converted)
    3. Recommendation of someone else with a conversion
    4. Has never owned a track frame with horizontal dropouts
    5. Ignorance

    I made the evolution from geared road > converted SS > Converted FG > Track frame. I would never convert another frame, no matter how classic/expensive/nostalgic/flashy/etc. & if I had a frame I had to keep, I'd send it to have horizontal dropouts fitted.

    Now, I presently ride a Windsor "The Hour" which is admittedly not a true track frame in that it is drilled for brakes & has braze-ons for a water bottle & fenders/rack which would obviously be of no use on the track. However, it does have horizontal dropouts so it has passed my test. I love it BTW.

    So weigh in. Let me know what your choice is & why.

    Thanks!

  2. #2
    Senior Member ZiP0082's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    My Bikes
    2008 Mercier Kilo TT
    Posts
    1,703
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    you pose a slightly, weirdly worded question

  3. #3
    One skid from blown knees bigbris1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    910
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    How so?

  4. #4
    Villainous huerro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Austin
    My Bikes
    Trek 420, Cyclops
    Posts
    1,894
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I didn't particularly care for road riding on a track frame. Road frames, fixed or free, have always given me more comfort and better handling for the kind of riding I most enjoy.

    Track ends vs. drop outs doesn't matter.

  5. #5
    extra bitter kyselad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    My Bikes
    Bridgestone Kabuki, Miyata Ninety
    Posts
    1,558
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The first problem with the wording would be your apparent substitution of the term "horizontal dropout" for "track (fork) end." If you're going to bash others' ignorance, you might want to straighten out your terminology.

  6. #6
    Senior Member powerband's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    764
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I voted track frame because most of the riding I do is no more than 10 miles. I enjoy the maneuverability of a track-framed bike.

    However, I'm in the process of a road-bike conversion for mileage greater than 10 miles.

    For me, each frame type has its purpose.
    Go Hard

  7. #7
    re:member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Cracow, Poland
    My Bikes
    unknown make TT bike, fixed; Romet Sport, gone; titanium Pinarello gone;Colnago with Campy C-Record/Super Record,on it's way; Funny Gianni Motta; Buehler track, Polrad track chrome; titanium MTB on 28'', fixed; Tri Wheeler, fixed
    Posts
    874
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Where is "both" as a choice?
    I do not ride track.
    For the city my preference is a track frame ( when the weather is good), for commuting a conversion of a road TT bike, for winter/off-road converted MTB.

  8. #8
    Packfodding 3 caloso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Sacramento, California, USA
    My Bikes
    Ridley Excalibur, Gazelle Champion Mondial, On-One Pompino, Specialized Rock Hopper
    Posts
    29,459
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have a road bike conversion. I ride it on the road and enjoy 25mm tires and front and rear brakes. If they ever build a velodrome here, I'll buy myself a track bike but it doesn't make much sense for me on the road.
    Cyclists of the world, unite! You have nothing to lube but your chains!

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    289
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have a sport tourer conversion (see signature) that suits most of my needs just fine. Having a fork that acts as essentially a suspension piece is an advantage most conversions have over track bikes, especially if you're doing more than a few miles per day on your bike. (I read this somewhere on BF, and it seems right to me, but can somebody with a little more know-how confirm for me?) Still, I wouldn't mind supplementing this ride with something will more aggressive, trackish geo (like an IRO) for when the mood strikes.

  10. #10
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    RI
    My Bikes
    schwinn Madison 08, working on a fuji and a free spirit.
    Posts
    14
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I find track to be smoother, but I'm working on a converted Fuji for "rough" rides.

  11. #11
    One skid from blown knees bigbris1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    910
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm amazed that conversions got 7 votes.

  12. #12
    Senior Member powerband's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    764
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by bigbris1 View Post
    I'm amazed that conversions got 7 votes.
    What do you mean? So few or so many?
    Go Hard

  13. #13
    Custom User Title anthegreat1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Huntsville, AL
    Posts
    450
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    doing a conversion at the moment on my Schwinn despite popular disapproval. I already have the bike and I like the way it looks. Also the only part I've bought for it that won't easily transfer to a "better" frame as the $20 BB adapter.
    yes . . . .my legs are sore

    BikeNinja

  14. #14
    Senior Member FarAwayBoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Minneapolis
    Posts
    135
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Conversion's are nice.
    But only when the frame is the only carry over.
    Other track-specific parts are just fine, but road geometry feels way better riding on the street.
    -Carpe mundi

  15. #15
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    8
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I prefer track frames; however, my ride as of now has geometry right in between road & track: Masi Speciale Fixed. The geometry feels great on long & short rides. I think it is a bunch of crap to say that you need "road geometry" for a road bike. Start stretching more...

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    997
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by bigbris1 View Post
    ... I believe they have done this due to:


    4. Has never owned a track frame with horizontal dropouts
    5. Ignorance
    I'd say your beliefs are predicated on ignorace.

    How about the obvious: 6) Riding Style: Ride on the road and not a track.
    Last edited by stevo; 07-25-08 at 06:10 AM.
    Bikes are meant to be ridden. Matt 6:19

  17. #17
    monster
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    707
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    As someone who nas ridden both, I voted for conversions. I'd much rather ride my Columbus lugged road conversion with full Campy over a Taiwanese mass produced frame just because it has track ends.

  18. #18
    One skid from blown knees bigbris1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    910
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by powerband View Post
    What do you mean? So few or so many?
    So many

  19. #19
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    20
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    voting for conversions b/c op is a tool.

  20. #20
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    GA
    Posts
    5,317
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by bigbris1
    I made the evolution from geared road > converted SS > Converted FG > Track frame. I would never convert another frame, no matter how classic/expensive/nostalgic/flashy/etc. & if I had a frame I had to keep, I'd send it to have horizontal dropouts fitted.
    Since I presume you mean track ends not horizontal dropouts this makes you a moron. horz dropouts are easier to deal with than track ends all around. Fenders are easier, switching gears is easier, fixing flats is easier, it's easier to switch to a low ss with a back brake, and to top it all off you can always put gears back on in a couple minutes

    Quote Originally Posted by bigbris1
    Now, I presently ride a Windsor "The Hour" which is admittedly not a true track frame in that it is drilled for brakes & has braze-ons for a water bottle & fenders/rack which would obviously be of no use on the track. However, it does have horizontal dropouts so it has passed my test. !
    No it doesn't it has track ends. There are plenty of true track frames with brake holes etc anyway these days. A few holes and braze ons do not effect how something rides on the track just what ****ups who like clean lines and useless bikes will think of it.

    Quote Originally Posted by mikeyfletch View Post
    Start stretching more...
    Yeah you're also probably one of those tools that rides around hunchbacked on the tops of your bars with locked elbows and thinks he's more flexible than everyone else too.

    Quote Originally Posted by farawayboy
    Conversion's are nice.
    But only when the frame is the only carry over.
    yeah **** a road stem or seatpost or bars or saddle or tires or pedals or ... Oh yeah the only track parts that matter are the hub and cog.

  21. #21
    One skid from blown knees bigbris1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    910
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    For you losers with conversions http://www.63xc.com/mikep/mikep.htm

  22. #22
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    20
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    LOL @ the guy with a Windsor calling conversion riders losers.

    Your piece of sht Windsor is an abortion on wheels...GTFO.

  23. #23
    monster
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    707
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by onewheeldrive View Post
    LOL @ the guy with a Windsor calling conversion riders losers.

    Your piece of sht Windsor is an abortion on wheels...GTFO.

    Haha, I didn't want to be the one to break it to this guy.

  24. #24
    One skid from blown knees bigbris1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    910
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have owned many different brand frames & the conclusion of the matter is this: They all do the same thing.

    So yeah, I ride a Windsor & I love it. Plus it is set up correctly for what I use it for, fixed gear cycling.

    Last edited by bigbris1; 07-25-08 at 08:47 AM.

  25. #25
    circus bear ban guzzi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Austin
    My Bikes
    97(?) GT Richochet, 00 Schwinn SuperSport
    Posts
    642
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by bigbris1 View Post
    For you losers with conversions
    nice...Maybe you can hang with a 40-50 mile fun ride and 20 mile RT commutes on your bike? I'll take the conversion for now, thanks. I like the Panisonics' lugged frame and it fits me just fine. No worries on long rides and I even run a rack, pannier, SPD's, lights and brakes! MTB seat, drops and running an ENO hub. I guess if being happy with what I'm running makes me a loser...

    So your poll was to get all the conversion riders in one place so you could play your 'loser' card?

    Jack-hole.
    Car Free Life.
    Riding without a brake is like saying that you trust traffic. ~ jonestr

Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •