Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 28
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    84
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    IRO Mark V Order

    I placed an order yesterday for a 56 cm Mark V and now I am wondering if I should of got the 59. I know there are countless threads on this but oh well. Here's the specs on my road bike that fits me great and the specs of the 56 and 59 cm IRO. I have no idea which one to get. The bike is going to be used for commuting so I want a comfortable fit but still maneuverable. Thanks for the opinions.

    Current Bike - 56cm Trek 1500
    Top Tube: 56.2cm
    Seat Tube: 56cm
    Stand Over: 31.1 in

    56cm IRO
    Top Tube: 55.5 cm
    Seat Tube 52 cm (this is what scares me, is it only measured to the center of the top tube or to the top of the collar?)
    Stand Over: 31 in

    59cm IRO
    Top Tube: 57cm
    Seat Tube: 55cm
    Stand Over 32 in

    If anyone has measured their seat tube from the collar to them middle of the bottom bracket and could let me know that would be great.
    Last edited by robsilverii; 08-06-08 at 01:59 PM.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    houston
    Posts
    135
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    just placed an order for a mark v 56cm as well!

    yeh, their c-t sizing kind of threw me too. i called them and they put me on this size frame, though the conversation did feel kind of rushed and there was a bit of commotion in the background! oh well, the top tube measurement was perfect and going up to a 59 made me really nervous.

    in the infinite posts on sizing iro frames someone had mentioned that they were actually smaller than their stated size (kind of the way the mercier's are sized...) but someone corrected the poster about them not being smaller but being...something, i can't remember.

    anyway, i'm curious too.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    84
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm 5'10.5"... The more I'm thinking about it the more I think them 59 would work best but I really have no clue.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    houston
    Posts
    135
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    dunno. i'm 5'11", 32" and change inseam. there's a guy on here who is 5'9" 33" inseam or something and rides a 59 and loves it, there's also one who seems exactly my size and rides the 56 and loves it. who are you to believe. i just called iro to put my mind at ease...

    still wondering about the c-t measurement though...

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    243
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    im 5'11'' with a 33'' inseam and rid a 59cm Soma Rush and almost got a 59cm Mark V but i got the Soma with much better parts for $400

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    84
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I don't want a Soma Rush. Sorry.

  7. #7
    1+1=10 do while x's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    dallas, tx
    Posts
    149
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    im 5'11" with a 33" inseam. I use to have a 59cm Angus, and it was too big. I wished i would have gotten the next smaller size.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    62
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm 6'2" with a 35" inseam and went with a 59 cm Mark V. It fits me perfectly. The seat is jacked up by about 4-5 inches.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    houston
    Posts
    135
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    uhhmmm....exactly! see robsilverii, it's all relative. i don't know, i figure i'll just stress about it until it arrives and i actually get to see it! i, however, ordered mine from pricepoint and they were out of the 59 so i could not have purchased it anywhoo...

  10. #10
    Senior Member NewYorkMantle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    475
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    robsilverii, here's a comparison of my old 56 and new 59 group buys (certain it's the exact same geometry as the mark v). we're the same height, so this should give you a vague idea of the proportioning you'll encounter.



  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    125
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm just under 5'11" ~32 and I got the 59 Mark V. I ordered one larger because he told me they ran small but when I stand over it my balls are barely touching the bike. I had to shorten up the stem a little and sometimes I feel a little stretched sometimes but for the most part it's not bad. Oh and the ball touching issue really increased my track stand ability.

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    84
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I guess as long at the Standover height is not too much than I should go with the 59

  13. #13
    Senior Member gfrance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    1,757
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm just under 5'10" (177cm). just over 32 inch real cycling inseam. I spoke with Tony personally, and he put me on the 59cm. And it works beautifully. I think the sizing is essentially stated size minus 3cm to equal other bikes. So the 59cm is really like a 56cm. And this makes sense to me by feel. My 59cm IRO actually feels a bit smaller to me than my 57cm Look road racing bike. Geometry is a weird thing.

  14. #14
    Senior Member gfrance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    1,757
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by robsilverii View Post
    I placed an order yesterday for a 56 cm Mark V and now I am wondering if I should of got the 59. I know there are countless threads on this but oh well. Here's the specs on my road bike that fits me great and the specs of the 56 and 59 cm IRO. I have no idea which one to get. The bike is going to be used for commuting so I want a comfortable fit but still maneuverable. Thanks for the opinions.

    Current Bike - 56cm Trek 1500
    Top Tube: 56.2cm
    Seat Tube: 56cm
    Stand Over: 31.1 in

    56cm IRO
    Top Tube: 55.5 cm
    Seat Tube 52 cm (this is what scares me, is it only measured to the center of the top tube or to the top of the collar?)
    Stand Over: 31 in

    59cm IRO
    Top Tube: 57cm
    Seat Tube: 55cm
    Stand Over 32 in

    If anyone has measured their seat tube from the collar to them middle of the bottom bracket and could let me know that would be great.
    I'm pretty sure that is 59cm. That's how they 'size' their frames (which is odd to me, but whatever). The top tube is 57cm, the seat tube center to center is 55cm.



    You need to be on the 59cm. Call Tony for verification.
    Last edited by gfrance; 08-07-08 at 07:48 AM.

  15. #15
    Senior Member NewYorkMantle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    475
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by gfrance View Post
    I think the sizing is essentially stated size minus 3cm to equal other bikes. So the 59cm is really like a 56cm.
    +1

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    84
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    NewYorkMantle, do you mind measuring your standover height for me?

  17. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    houston
    Posts
    135
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    gfrance, like i said, i'm taller than you with probably a bit longer inseam and i was put on a 56 by tony...so, again, it's relative. plus, when doing my calculation for top-tube i was put somewhere between 55-55.4 so anything longer would seem have me stretched out over the top of the bike.
    Last edited by this1time; 08-07-08 at 12:02 PM.

  18. #18
    Senior Member jaggd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    50
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm 5'10 with a 32" inseam.

    I tried both a 56 and a 58 in the Rob Roy, and although I know that sizing is different, that frame also has IRO's "compact geometry". I went with the 56, partially due to top tube junk clearance, and partially to have a tighter fit for riding in NYC traffic.

  19. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    84
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I really have no clue what to do. If I felt confident in the fact that the stand over on the 59 would not be too big I would call Tony have em switch me over to one.

  20. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    houston
    Posts
    135
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    have you called him? it somewhat put my mind at ease. fact is, you won't know until you ride it. and, quite frankly, if you're worried about stand over, i think you ordered the right one!

    oh yeh, how long is your wait for this bike? the whole 3-4 week thing really bothered me...

  21. #21
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    My Bikes
    Iro Mark V
    Posts
    11
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I ordered by bike on July 30th and was notified that it had been shipped on August 7th. As of 11:39am on the 8th, the bike is sitting in Secaucus, NJ, less than an hour away. Unfortunately, it's not scheduled to arrive at my apartment until the 11th.

    I think the quick turnaround had to do with the fact that I ordered a Mark V with a pretty standard build.

  22. #22
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    47
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ryan. View Post
    I'm 6'2" with a 35" inseam and went with a 59 cm Mark V. It fits me perfectly. The seat is jacked up by about 4-5 inches.

    you don't by chance live in new york city and would be willing to let me take your bike for a spin around the block would you?

    i'm 6'3" and 34" inseam and i'm about to pull the trigger on an IRO, but am a bit nervous about which size to get.

    thanks,

    eric

  23. #23
    Senior Member Badbalance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Boston
    My Bikes
    IRO Mark V, 10 Speed C-dale
    Posts
    142
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm 6' with a 33" inseam and I ride a 59 Mark V. I just measured the stand over height for you it was 33". However, my nuts are not sitting on the top tube when I'm standing on the ground, I got plenty of room. Maybe I don't know how to measure my inseam correctly

  24. #24
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    2
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    5'11 1/2 w/ 32.5"-33" cycling inseam. I got a 59 Mark V and had to swap it for a 56 Mark V. With the 170mm crank I needed to have the seat pretty much all the way down to avoid having my leg completely extended and stretched on the down stroke and when standing my balls rested on the top tube in regular shoes. The 56 works much better for me.
    Last edited by stoprock; 08-10-08 at 11:16 AM.

  25. #25
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    DC || CA
    Posts
    21
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by eric400 View Post
    you don't by chance live in new york city and would be willing to let me take your bike for a spin around the block would you?

    i'm 6'3" and 34" inseam and i'm about to pull the trigger on an IRO, but am a bit nervous about which size to get.

    thanks,

    eric
    you can probably find somebody to help you out with this on a regional forum (fixed.gr i believe for nyc)

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •