Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 52
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    NEBRASKA
    My Bikes
    2001 Trek 800 Singletrack (single speed for singletrack and chores), 2007 Giant TranSend DX, 1973 Schwinn Varsity ss
    Posts
    108
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Single Speed Brake: Front or back?

    So I am only going to use one brake on my single speed I'm almost done with. I've got one good side-pull brake to use. I know when using two, and stopping fast, you should use about 75% front, 25% back brake. I am way more dominant with my rear brake. But, looking through a lot of pictures, I see that most people are putting solely front brakes on.

    I would rather have a back brake only. I know that there is more skidding involved in a quick stop, but I grew up only using my back brake...literally. Therefore, I feel more comfortable with a back brake.

    The main question:

    Is there any sort of crucial advantage to having solely a front brake on a single speed?

    Thanks guys!

    Max
    "it will be a great day when our schools get all the money they need and the air force has to hold a bake sale to buy a bomber"

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    DFW
    Posts
    71
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    For a single speed (ie freewheel), you should have 2 brakes.
    Chris

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Gainesville, FL
    My Bikes
    1972 Raleigh Super Course - Green
    Posts
    184
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You have more stopping power on the front. But you should have both brakes so you don't fly off your bike if you have to make a hard stop.

  4. #4
    Senior Member iamtim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    La Habra, CA.
    Posts
    2,979
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I grew up on a single rear brake as well; gotta love BMX.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Fleetdog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Madison WI
    My Bikes
    Gary Fisher Wingra
    Posts
    79
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Most of the bikes you see on here with only a front brake are fixed gear (no coasting) so in effect, the pedals double as a rear brake. Running a rear only on a SS would be roughly equivalent to riding fixed with no brakes or a SS with a coaster brake only. Certainly, lots of folks do both of those things.

    The argument for having both is similar to the argument for running a front brake with a fixed gear. There is safety in redundancy. Should something happen to your ability to brake on the rear wheel, the front is still an option. If you're comfortable putting all your faith in a single brake then that's fine. Lots of folks get by with a single method of braking everyday.

    That said, I'm putting 2 brakes on my SS build because I don't trust them to be 100% reliable (and because my frame came with 2 brakes and some cool holders for the rear cable welded to the top tube that I like the look of with cable in them). My decision is based 80% on function, 5% convenience, and 15% looks.

    Your decision is totally up to you.

  6. #6
    The Thing Itself
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Boston, Massachusetts
    Posts
    145
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    On a true singlespeed, you should have both, as you'd have no (good) way to stop should the one go out. If, however, you're on a fixed gear, and can therefore apply back pressure as a brake - or if you really want to just have one, then the brake should be on the front.

    There's nothing about having a rear brake (other than the additional, extremely minimal weight of the cable and calipers behind the center of gravity) that'll keep you from "fly[ing] off" under maximum braking, as the rear wheel will already be completely unweighted and any brake back there won't be at all effective. Now, under certain conditions, e.g. slippery roads, rear braking is safer than front braking, but it's never more effective.

  7. #7
    big ring MIN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    philadelphia
    Posts
    5,839
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    if you must run a single brake on a ss, then I say rear in the rainy/snowy/muddy conditions and front in everything else. understeer on a bike is a beyotch!

  8. #8
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    minnapolis, mn
    My Bikes
    2007 Giant Cypress, 2007 Surly Steamroller
    Posts
    3
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    looks like he's in nebraska which means ice is probably a minimal concern...

  9. #9
    partly metal, partly real sp00ki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Philadelphia.
    My Bikes
    Hummer H2
    Posts
    3,597
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    fg: front
    freewheel: both

    don't try to rewrite physics; definitely don't try to fake the funk.

    speaking of faking the funk, anyone see the chubby guy ridding around phila with the coaster brake and too-shorts on his pretend tarck bike?
    Quote Originally Posted by bonechilling View Post
    Road [racing] is one of the only sports where adult men can compete in a non-scholastic setting, so inevitably 8/10 racers are fiercely-competitive nobodies. It's fun as hell, but it's also the foremost refuge of defeated and aging jocks, turned middle-management types.

  10. #10
    Banned.
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    68
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ..
    Last edited by theBEAR; 08-03-10 at 11:29 AM.

  11. #11
    big ring MIN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    philadelphia
    Posts
    5,839
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Why so angry careBear? Need a hug?

  12. #12
    shiz bichiz
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    225
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I rolled without a rear on my ss bike for a few months. Everything was fine but it made me nervous. Never again. Now I have a front brake on my fixed gear bike, and the ss is turning into a townie bike. It has canti bosses and will be getting the Mafac style cantis from Velo-Orange.

  13. #13
    fxp
    fxp is offline
    Junior Member fxp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    NYC
    My Bikes
    Fuji Track
    Posts
    16
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    On my SS I added a front brake. It just makes sense to use both wheels to stop -- back pressure on the rear and calipers on the front. When all else fails, your helmet dragging on the pavement works, too.

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    NEBRASKA
    My Bikes
    2001 Trek 800 Singletrack (single speed for singletrack and chores), 2007 Giant TranSend DX, 1973 Schwinn Varsity ss
    Posts
    108
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I always wondered why people were always running one front; the fixed gear thing makes sense. I just got some new brake stuff today, so I'll be running two. Thanks soo much to those of you that reasoned in your post.

    No thanks:theBEAR
    WTF is your problem, man? I don't even know you. Grow up.


    Max
    "it will be a great day when our schools get all the money they need and the air force has to hold a bake sale to buy a bomber"

  15. #15
    Live without dead time
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    2,137
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by thebeard View Post
    I always wondered why people were always running one front; the fixed gear thing makes sense.
    Not just the fixed gear thing, but physics as someone mentioned. In the vast vast majority of situations, a front brake is the only brake you need/should be using as it's more effective than back brakeing by a good margin. Using both brakes at once is not advised by some people as it can lead to fishtailing.

  16. #16
    K2ProFlex baby! ilikebikes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    My response would have been something along the lines of: "Does your bike have computer controlled suspension? Then shut your piehole, this baby is from the future!"
    My Bikes
    to many to list
    Posts
    6,093
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by theBEAR View Post
    both brakes ******bag. one brake is a horribly dumb idea on your single speed. quit being stupid.
    Maybe you should drop the "cool dude" part
    You see, their morals, their code...it's a bad joke, dropped at the first sign of trouble. They're only as good as the world allows them to be. I'll show you. When the chips are down, these...These "civilized" people...they'll eat each other. See, I'm not a monster. I'm just ahead of the curve

  17. #17
    Senior Member aMull's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Toronto
    My Bikes
    Leader 735TR 09 58cm 46/17
    Posts
    1,777
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by elTwitcho View Post
    Not just the fixed gear thing, but physics as someone mentioned. In the vast vast majority of situations, a front brake is the only brake you need/should be using as it's more effective than back brakeing by a good margin. Using both brakes at once is not advised by some people as it can lead to fishtailing.
    That's right, i pretty much used only front brake even on my geared bike. However it's a good idea to have two, but you'll most likely be fine with just a front. I have never had a brake fail on me ever so far, so it has to be a rare occurrence. And even if it happens, you can use your leg on the back tire to stop.

  18. #18
    Perineal Pressurized dobber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    In Ebritated
    Posts
    6,557
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by unprintable View Post
    The front has more stopping power. But you should really have both so you don't fly off the bike if you have to make a hard stop.

    Explain how two brakes prevents unintentional flight
    This is Africa, 1943. War spits out its violence overhead and the sandy graveyard swallows it up. Her name is King Nine, B-25, medium bomber, Twelfth Air Force. On a hot, still morning she took off from Tunisia to bomb the southern tip of Italy. An errant piece of flak tore a hole in a wing tank and, like a wounded bird, this is where she landed, not to return on this day, or any other day.

  19. #19
    Perineal Pressurized dobber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    In Ebritated
    Posts
    6,557
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by theBEAR View Post
    both brakes ******bag. one brake is a horribly dumb idea on your single speed. quit being stupid.


    Wow. Newbie on the Pista pulls out the hostility card.
    This is Africa, 1943. War spits out its violence overhead and the sandy graveyard swallows it up. Her name is King Nine, B-25, medium bomber, Twelfth Air Force. On a hot, still morning she took off from Tunisia to bomb the southern tip of Italy. An errant piece of flak tore a hole in a wing tank and, like a wounded bird, this is where she landed, not to return on this day, or any other day.

  20. #20
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    48
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Explain how two brakes prevents unintentional flight
    If you only have a front brake, it is easier to flip over the bars if you slam them on?

  21. #21
    No plan. peabodypride's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    2,744
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by sp00ki View Post
    fg: front
    freewheel: both

    don't try to rewrite physics; definitely don't try to fake the funk.

    speaking of faking the funk, anyone see the chubby guy ridding around phila with the coaster brake and too-shorts on his pretend tarck bike?
    sounds like me, but I have a real tarck bike

  22. #22
    Rollin
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Melb
    Posts
    10
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ilikebikes View Post
    Maybe you should drop the "cool dude" part
    Quote Originally Posted by dobber View Post
    Wow. Newbie on the Pista pulls out the hostility card.
    self proclaimed 'cool dude'.

    what a champ.

  23. #23
    hello roadfix's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Los Angeles
    My Bikes
    thank you for asking
    Posts
    18,502
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Run both brakes on the SS or I'm not your friend. I swear.

  24. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    NEBRASKA
    My Bikes
    2001 Trek 800 Singletrack (single speed for singletrack and chores), 2007 Giant TranSend DX, 1973 Schwinn Varsity ss
    Posts
    108
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by roadfix View Post
    Run both brakes on the SS or I'm not your friend. I swear.
    Yeah, like I said, I'm going to run two. I was just confused, as stated before, from all the pictures I had seen. I understand the physics aspect of it; hence the reason I assumed using a back brake would be more sufficient being that only using a front brake (with no coaster) in a quick stop would not stop the momentum of the rider.

    Again, thanks so much guys. I'm glad 99% of you give me the information that I need.

    Max
    "it will be a great day when our schools get all the money they need and the air force has to hold a bake sale to buy a bomber"

  25. #25
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    11
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by thebeard View Post
    only using a front brake (with no coaster) in a quick stop would not stop the momentum of the rider.
    hmm? typo? any deceleration caused by either tire results in load transfer off the rear and onto the front. the reduced load on the rear reduces its braking ability while the increased load on the front increases the braking ability at that end. so, the harder you brake with a rear brake (or back pedal pressure with a fg) the less tractive ability it has. on the other hand, the harder you brake with the front brake the more tractive ability it gains.

    anyways, using any brake (alone or with one on the other end) in any stop (quick or slow) nearly by definition stops the momentum of the rider. the exception is when you screw up (or have bad luck) and tires slide or you endo resulting in the nasty shiny-side-down sort of situation. but, the front will be able to decelerate the rider more quickly.

    -kyle

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •