Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    3
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    tall guy fixie needed

    hey new here, hope i am not pissing inthe cherios. i am tall, 6'6", and i want to set up my first fixie, but in looking at geometries it seems most complete bikes available are kinda short style. i want a more stretched out ride so my feets dont hit the front tire as much and just to stretch out my long frame body for comfort. anyone have suggestions on good frames/complete bikes? i am looking at the iro rob roy (but it has all the brakes and stuff) and the jamis sputnik. i was hoping to find a complete bike just to save some bucks over a ground up build but if its the only way then i guess i can do that. my budget is around 1000$ thanks!

  2. #2
    Senior Member JayNev's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    842
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    you have a large budget for a first fixed gear bike. are you sure you like it?

    the bikesdirect bikes come in 63 . . .
    i'll coast when i'm dead

  3. #3
    Senior Member ZiP0082's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    My Bikes
    2008 Mercier Kilo TT
    Posts
    1,703
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    yeah -- i'd think that a 63cm with slightly more road geometry than track might fit the bill (and be less than $1000).

  4. #4
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    3
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    yeah, well, in looking at the frames more i am wondering if longer wheelbas is really more depending on rear triangle size, which wont really affect the toe overlap as much i guess. i would really like to try the iro markV or the steamroller, both are available in 62cm. whats the opinion on these?

  5. #5
    Color Blind
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Bloomington Indiana
    My Bikes
    1970's Fuji Del Rey
    Posts
    369
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    im 6' 4" with a 33" inseam and ride a 60cm mercier kilo TT. and i believe it comes in a 62cm also, check it out. my bike has no toe overlap and i have XL clips on the pedals too.
    DEATH PEDALz

  6. #6
    Banned.
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    on the moon
    My Bikes
    Cinelli Mash
    Posts
    2,022
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    my motobecane messenger is a 64cm and i really like it.

    im 6'6" with a 36 inseam

  7. #7
    Senior Member beeftech's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Brooklyn finally.
    My Bikes
    Bianchi San Jose, fixed
    Posts
    832
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Man you ****ers are tall...

  8. #8
    Banned.
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    on the moon
    My Bikes
    Cinelli Mash
    Posts
    2,022
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    we are normal, yall are short

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    3,310
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by solbrothers View Post
    we are normal, yall are short
    True, every generation with good nutrition gets taller

    Shorties should go back in time and smack your ancestors for not eating better

  10. #10
    shiz bichiz
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    225
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I would tend to agree that you should try one of the big Mercier frames... I have an IRO group buy 62cm and it fits me well but it's more like a 59cm. I am 6'2" with a 34" inseam. I could take a frame another cm taller to be honest, but the bb is taller than my 59cm conversion and I can feel the height with a toe down.

    So yeah. I think an IRO wouldn't be tall enough for you if you want a bike that fits well in the classic sense, as opposed to having a tall seatpost and stem combo.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    61
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm 6' 2" but I have pretty damn long legs for my height. I ride a 62 Schwinn World Sport. I can stand over it without smashing my balls, and the seat is about 3 inches above the frame and about 2 inches lower than I want it (will adjust it when my new saddle comes in Wednesday).

  12. #12
    N+1 redxj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    My Bikes
    A few
    Posts
    1,326
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You are going to have trouble finding a big frame that does have toe overlap. I have a couple of track bikes and only one has toe overlap (w/ size 50 Sidis), and the is an vintage Italian Viner track that was super steep and extremely short wheelbase. I am also 6'6' so I know how you feel. The old 61cm GT track frames have a big top tube (61cm), 64cm Fuji track that is made anymore as well, plus the Mercier, Surly Steamroller, Giant Bowerys, etc.

  13. #13
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    3
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    so you guys think a 60 cm top tube is too short for me? as far as my balls are concerned, i would rather have a little too much clearance than too little, but cant have a up-sloping top tube for asthetics. gotta say the orange motobeccane messenger looks nice and simple, and cheap. hold on, comes in pink too? now were talking. their website only has sizes up to 61 and the bikesdirect has them in 64?

    just curious the numbers. appears the mercier kilo only comes up to 60 but still has 61.5 cm top tube for what thats worth. again the bikesdirect has this model in 63, only in fact , so.. WTF? i gonna start swingin these big ole spaghetti string bean arms around knock someone out!
    anybody with a kilo tt please post me the geometry?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •