Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: How much Rake?

  1. #1
    Not the guy from the film MASHeug's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Eugene, OR
    Posts
    112
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    How much Rake?

    I am riding a Dawes SST wich has a 70 degree head tube... unfortunatly i cannot find anywere that lists the sweep on the fork... I would like a bit tighter ride, and have been looking into a set of forks as a fix, instead of rushing into a new frameset.
    So, two real questions:
    A) Does anone know the fork sweep on the stock dawes SST fork?

    B) How much rake seems reasonable with a 70* head tube.

  2. #2
    Not the guy from the film MASHeug's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Eugene, OR
    Posts
    112
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    bike in question

  3. #3
    Blue Light Special kmart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Bay Area, Sunny Cali
    My Bikes
    '05 Felt F55, Schwinn Prologue road bike, '86 Centurion DS Iron Man, Sette Flite AM MTB
    Posts
    1,469
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    With a headtube that slack, you cannot attempt to quicken the steering with a low rake fork without sacrificing stability. I would use one of those online fork rake calculators (google search, they all do the same math even if they are made for motorcycles instead of bicycles) to find what rake you need to achieve the desired trail distance for a 70* HT. Start by entering a typical road frame HT angle of 73* and 40mm rake, assuming this is the kind of handling you are trying to achieve. Then calculate the trail distance this gives. Now enter that trail distance and the 70* HT angle into the calculator and solve for the the new rake. I think the number you will get is really low...

    EDIT: Oops, I guess you do want more rake (less trail)...I try not to get those confused...Here's a decent calculator for doing the math:
    http://www.kreuzotter.de/english/elenk.htm
    Last edited by kmart; 08-19-08 at 05:57 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by KrisPistofferson View Post
    racer x flies across cobblestones with a grimace of determination, three feet of seatpost, bars level with ankles, carbon fiber frame with Kryptonite lugs and a millimeter clearance between the fork and the 700x21c tires. This gives everyone a *****

  4. #4
    -
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Banned in DC
    Posts
    454
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You want more rake, not less, if you want to make the handling "quicker".

    The bikesdirect owner posts here often, I'd suggest changing the title of this thread so he recognizes it or PM'ing him.
    I have a front brake, but I only use it for slowing or stopping.

  5. #5
    Senior Member mihlbach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    6,347
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The Dawes SST has a 72 degree heatube angle...not 70.

    72 is not unusual. Cyclocross frames and small sized road frames typically have a similar head tube angle. Typical road bike geometry usually involves a head tube that is steeper by only 1-1.5 degrees. Thats not much.

    Decreasing the rake will make your bike look tighter, but it will handle more sluggishly. I have no idea what the rake is on the stock SST fork, but for that frame I would want something around 45 mm, perhaps a little more, but not much more.
    Last edited by mihlbach; 08-19-08 at 12:07 PM.

  6. #6
    my bike Owns me+my wallet Kol.klink's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Sudbury, Ontario
    My Bikes
    Px-10 singeld, 2007 KHS filte 100
    Posts
    710
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Lots!
    Last edited by Kol.klink; 08-19-08 at 12:31 PM.

  7. #7
    . bbattle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Huntsville, Alabama
    My Bikes
    2014 Trek Domane 5.2, 1985 Pinarello Trevisio, 1991 Colnago Master, '06 Bianchi San Jose, 1987 Moulton Fuso, '80's Gardin Shred?, '82 John Howard(Dave Tesch)
    Posts
    11,696
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Just be careful the first time you bomb a long hill. Changing the rake may increase the risk of shimmy which could lead to a bad crash.

    There was a long thread in the Roadie forum about this; guy gets new fork then experiences violent speed wobble while going downhill. Turns out the trail on the new fork was less than the old one(rake was more).

  8. #8
    freelance gangster
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    377
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've done some searching around back when I was looking into different forks for my 54cm Dawes SST, and while I can't remember my sources or how I figured it out, I think I remember the stock fork rake to be 43-44 . Again, I don't remember my sources and have nothing to back that up besides my memory. So pretty much this post is worthless and I'm just wasting time at work.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •