Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
Reload this Page >

Commuting question?

Search
Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

Commuting question?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-18-08, 09:46 PM
  #1  
Got My Vans On
Thread Starter
 
Mattrek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: West Plains, MO
Posts: 156

Bikes: 1970(s) Schwinn Supersport (under construction)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Commuting question?

Are fixed gears/single speeds efficient for commuting. For example, would riding a Specialized Langster be wise if your ride was 11 miles round trip? Or would I be better off getting a road bicycle?
Mattrek is offline  
Old 08-18-08, 09:58 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 71
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I definitely prefer my fixed gear over my road bike for commuting (about 14 miles round trip). Hills can be an issue but only if mind doing a little spinning(if you choose fg over ss that is).
kiesterstash is offline  
Old 08-18-08, 10:05 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Sangetsu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: 東京都
Posts: 854
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 570 Post(s)
Liked 33 Times in 21 Posts
11 miles is barely enough distance to get warmed up. For such a short round-trip distance, I would prefer a lower gear combination to allow a little faster cadence. A single speed or fixed gear is perfectly fine for commuting.
Sangetsu is offline  
Old 08-18-08, 10:08 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 71
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sangetsu
11 miles is barely enough distance to get warmed up.
Yeah, especially with an eight hour brake in the middle
kiesterstash is offline  
Old 08-18-08, 10:09 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
caloso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur

Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times in 1,417 Posts
Lots of folks commute on a fixed gear. My rainy weather commuter is a 42x16 FG.
caloso is offline  
Old 08-18-08, 10:09 PM
  #6  
Live without dead time
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,136
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I commute with my fixed gear and the only time I find my FG not convenient is when I have to carry alot of weight in my backpack (25+ pounds). At those times I prefer my more upright bike rather than have all that weight on my back when I'm using road bars, but otherwise I prefer my fixed
elTwitcho is offline  
Old 08-18-08, 10:11 PM
  #7  
Banned.
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: on the moon
Posts: 2,021

Bikes: Cinelli Mash

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
ugh! id love to commute on my fixed gear! but id have to leave the house at like 5:45am and its too damn hot after work.
solbrothers is offline  
Old 08-18-08, 10:14 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 71
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by solbrothers
ugh! id love to commute on my fixed gear! but id have to leave the house at like 5:45am and its too damn hot after work.
I don't see what has to do with riding fixed vs. freewheel.
kiesterstash is offline  
Old 08-18-08, 10:17 PM
  #9  
Prefers Cicero
 
cooker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 12,872

Bikes: 1984 Trek 520; 2007 Bike Friday NWT; misc others

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3943 Post(s)
Liked 117 Times in 92 Posts
You posted this question in the single speed/fixed gear forum where there might be a bias in favour of SS/FG (ya think??)

The overwhelming majority of commuters do not use fixed gear or even single speed bikes. Those who do, obviously like that choice. For the rest of us, however, the whole point of gears is to make cycling a little more efficient.
cooker is offline  
Old 08-18-08, 10:20 PM
  #10  
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 141
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
As has been said you will have no problem if there are not overly steep hills in your commute. Once you build up to them hills are fine and often fun. Keep in mind I live in a city on the East Coast and even steep hills are often short and therefore doable. Not sure what the geography is like out in the square states.
illadelphia esq is offline  
Old 08-18-08, 10:40 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
powerband's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 764
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Yes. Fixed. It's good. 11 miles, no problem. I go 12. I also go 50 on weekends.
powerband is offline  
Old 08-18-08, 10:44 PM
  #12  
circus bear
 
ban guzzi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Austin
Posts: 642

Bikes: 97(?) GT Richochet, 00 Schwinn SuperSport

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
You'll be fine. I commute 20 miles RT. Even has some hilly sections.
And I do 40-50 miles on the weekends for fun. Running 75 gear inches (52/19). Faster on the geared bike but have more fun and a better work out (if that matters to you) on the fixed.
ban guzzi is offline  
Old 08-18-08, 11:02 PM
  #13  
Banned.
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: on the moon
Posts: 2,021

Bikes: Cinelli Mash

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by kiesterstash
I don't see what has to do with riding fixed vs. freewheel.
oh, my bad. i drive to work. lol
solbrothers is offline  
Old 08-18-08, 11:04 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 71
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by solbrothers
oh, my bad. i drive to work. lol
Ohh I see.
kiesterstash is offline  
Old 08-18-08, 11:32 PM
  #15  
Got My Vans On
Thread Starter
 
Mattrek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: West Plains, MO
Posts: 156

Bikes: 1970(s) Schwinn Supersport (under construction)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by cooker
You posted this question in the single speed/fixed gear forum where there might be a bias in favour of SS/FG (ya think??)

The overwhelming majority of commuters do not use fixed gear or even single speed bikes. Those who do, obviously like that choice. For the rest of us, however, the whole point of gears is to make cycling a little more efficient.
I just wanted to hear all of the things that the fixed gear enthus' have to say... I realized before I even posted that the commuting forum would be better and I attend to post there as well.
Mattrek is offline  
Old 08-18-08, 11:34 PM
  #16  
Got My Vans On
Thread Starter
 
Mattrek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: West Plains, MO
Posts: 156

Bikes: 1970(s) Schwinn Supersport (under construction)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by illadelphia esq
Not sure what the geography is like out in the square states.
Mainly gradual hills that don't have much incline... they just take forever to climb and are tiresome.
Mattrek is offline  
Old 08-18-08, 11:36 PM
  #17  
Got My Vans On
Thread Starter
 
Mattrek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: West Plains, MO
Posts: 156

Bikes: 1970(s) Schwinn Supersport (under construction)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
In general to all, thank you for your input thus far.
Mattrek is offline  
Old 08-18-08, 11:44 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
beeftech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Brooklyn finally.
Posts: 832

Bikes: Bianchi San Jose, fixed

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I think you'd be fine on a Langster, from the description of your area.
But really any compact geometry frame would be fine.
beeftech is offline  
Old 08-18-08, 11:47 PM
  #19  
Got My Vans On
Thread Starter
 
Mattrek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: West Plains, MO
Posts: 156

Bikes: 1970(s) Schwinn Supersport (under construction)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by beeftech
I think you'd be fine on a Langster, from the description of your area.
But really any compact geometry frame would be fine.
Haha, the Langster was just an example, if I was to buy any brand new FG/SS bike it would probably be a Steamroller (Surly), but otherwise my fixed gear will probably be something I pick up of Craig's List or a garage sale.
Mattrek is offline  
Old 08-19-08, 07:26 AM
  #20  
Live without dead time
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,136
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cooker
You posted this question in the single speed/fixed gear forum where there might be a bias in favour of SS/FG (ya think??)

The overwhelming majority of commuters do not use fixed gear or even single speed bikes. Those who do, obviously like that choice. For the rest of us, however, the whole point of gears is to make cycling a little more efficient.
As someone who commutes in the same city you do, I think both of us know that the majority of commuters use beaten up rusty bikes and don't bother shifting and aren't likely concerned about things like efficiency. You can commute on just about anything, for a short distance commute like the one being discussed, ride whatever is the most fun
elTwitcho is offline  
Old 08-19-08, 07:38 AM
  #21  
jpdesjar
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
i enjoy commuting on my fixed wheel bicycle it is made for roads
 
Old 08-19-08, 07:49 AM
  #22  
Prefers Cicero
 
cooker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 12,872

Bikes: 1984 Trek 520; 2007 Bike Friday NWT; misc others

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3943 Post(s)
Liked 117 Times in 92 Posts
Originally Posted by elTwitcho
As someone who commutes in the same city you do, I think both of us know that the majority of commuters use beaten up rusty bikes and don't bother shifting and aren't likely concerned about things like efficiency. You can commute on just about anything, for a short distance commute like the one being discussed, ride whatever is the most fun
I misread the OP and thought it was 11 miles one way (or maybe he edited to clarify) and I agree with you.
cooker is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.