Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
Reload this Page >

First SS Commute...and FG question

Search
Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

First SS Commute...and FG question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-03-08, 08:17 AM
  #1  
Should Be More Popular
Thread Starter
 
datlas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,038

Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix

Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22583 Post(s)
Liked 8,923 Times in 4,156 Posts
First SS Commute...and FG question

Rode the BD (don't groan) Dawes SST to work today (10 miles, a few hills). It was most excellent. I only had to stand up to climb once.

I am used to doing the commute on the road bike (12 speed) but from now on I will be using the SST.

I don't have a FG cog for the flip side yet, but want to try...but was wondering...does the collective knowledge of the forum recommend keeping the same gear size for FG and SS? It looks like Sheldon Brown's site suggests the fixed cog should be 1 or 2 teeth smaller than the freewheel...but I am not so sure I buy his logic (and I can't ask him directly!).

Last edited by datlas; 10-03-08 at 08:46 AM.
datlas is offline  
Old 10-03-08, 09:01 AM
  #2  
Head Chief
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: kettering ohio
Posts: 332

Bikes: Motobecane Messenger

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
That is common. The reason is when you get tired, or have to climb an extreme amount, you are going to want a lower gear or number of gear inches on the freewheel side. What gearing are you running right now on the freewheel? If it is 46/16 I suggest getting a 16 tooth fixed cog. My reasoning would be you do not want to be riding a 46/15 or 46/14 as a new rider. That would be approaching/over 80 gear inches.

Now I am not a pro on this, as my first fixed gear will be arriving via UPS today (messenger from BD) but I think my logic is straight. I will probably be buying a smaller chainring or a bigger fixed cog, as 78 GI is going to be fairly high for me.
2new2this is offline  
Old 10-03-08, 09:05 AM
  #3  
Should Be More Popular
Thread Starter
 
datlas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,038

Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix

Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22583 Post(s)
Liked 8,923 Times in 4,156 Posts
2new...I am riding a 46/16 which is the stock gearing for this bike. My inclination is to get the same, or maybe even a 17t gear for fixed...but if I were to follow Sheldon's advice I would get a 14 or 15 which would be waaaay too big a gear for me!
datlas is offline  
Old 10-03-08, 09:13 AM
  #4  
Head Chief
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: kettering ohio
Posts: 332

Bikes: Motobecane Messenger

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by datlas
2new...I am riding a 46/16 which is the stock gearing for this bike. My inclination is to get the same, or maybe even a 17t gear for fixed...but if I were to follow Sheldon's advice I would get a 14 or 15 which would be waaaay too big a gear for me!
I agree. Now that I looked at my bike again on BD I might have to do a full drivetrain upgrade, as I want a 1/8" chain/cog/chainring. You might also look into this, if you have some cash to spare. That way you could bump your chainring down to 42/44 and run a 16/17 fixed/free or something along those lines. I am glad to hear you are enjoying the bike though.
2new2this is offline  
Old 10-03-08, 09:20 AM
  #5  
Should Be More Popular
Thread Starter
 
datlas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,038

Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix

Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22583 Post(s)
Liked 8,923 Times in 4,156 Posts
Originally Posted by 2new2this
I agree. Now that I looked at my bike again on BD I might have to do a full drivetrain upgrade, as I want a 1/8" chain/cog/chainring. You might also look into this, if you have some cash to spare. That way you could bump your chainring down to 42/44 and run a 16/17 fixed/free or something along those lines. I am glad to hear you are enjoying the bike though.
Thanks, it's a good bike for a cheapskate like me. I will probably try a 16 or 17 with the stock chainring. Since the largest size D-A cog is 16 I will probably get one of those.

I am new to FG/SS but have been an avid roadie for many years, so the 46/16 is ok but I don't think I want to go bigger than that.
datlas is offline  
Old 10-03-08, 09:23 AM
  #6  
Pants are for suckaz
 
HandsomeRyan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Mt. Airy, MD
Posts: 2,578

Bikes: Hardtail MTB, Fixed gear, and Commuter bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
If I were you, I'd keep the 46t chainring and go with a 17t fixed cog. This will give you about 73 gear inches and 17 skid patches (if you are into that sort of thing).

I run 48/18 on my Messenger and that has been fine for the rolling terrain around here. The downside to this gearing is only having 3 skid patches.

The difference between the fixed/freewheel sides doesn't matter because you'll be having so much riding fixed you'll never flip the wheel back to the freewheel side anyway.
HandsomeRyan is offline  
Old 10-03-08, 09:28 AM
  #7  
Head Chief
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: kettering ohio
Posts: 332

Bikes: Motobecane Messenger

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by HandsomeRyan
If I were you, I'd keep the 46t chainring and go with a 17t fixed cog. This will give you about 73 gear inches and 17 skid patches (if you are into that sort of thing).

I run 48/18 on my Messenger and that has been fine for the rolling terrain around here. The downside to this gearing is only having 3 skid patches.

The difference between the fixed/freewheel sides doesn't matter because you'll be having so much riding fixed you'll never flip the wheel back to the freewheel side anyway.
I like the way this guy thinks!
2new2this is offline  
Old 10-03-08, 09:32 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,544
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by HandsomeRyan
The difference between the fixed/freewheel sides doesn't matter because you'll be having so much riding fixed you'll never flip the wheel back to the freewheel side anyway.
I put a freewheel on my fixed-gear commuter, flipped the wheel and never went back to fixed. Different strokes, I suppose.

I think that the larger freewheel idea has a lot to do with going downhill - on a fixed-gear a large cog is going to require a high cadence when going downhill but with a freewheel you can just coast.
Yoshi is offline  
Old 10-03-08, 09:34 AM
  #9  
Ketchup
 
middy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 464
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked 8 Times in 2 Posts
Get a 17 tooth cog. This will give you a lot more skid patches and make that one hill a bit easier.

I have the Dawes SST and I changed out the 16 tooth freewheel for a 18 to spare my knees on the hills. I spin out quicker, but I need to work on my spin anyway.

I went the opposite way with the drivetrain. My new freewheel is 3/32 so I got a 3/32 chain.
middy is offline  
Old 10-03-08, 09:37 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Catnap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ridgewood, Queens
Posts: 1,847

Bikes: Zunow, 3Rensho, Look KG196

Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 162 Post(s)
Liked 466 Times in 185 Posts
46/18 is nice... i run 44/17 singlespeed on my Soho S and it's perfect for commuting.
__________________
Check out www.djcatnap.com for articles on vintage Japanese & French bicycle restorations, components and history.
Catnap is offline  
Old 10-03-08, 09:38 AM
  #11  
Should Be More Popular
Thread Starter
 
datlas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,038

Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix

Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22583 Post(s)
Liked 8,923 Times in 4,156 Posts
Sounds like the 17t might be a winner...is the miche any good? I know it's cheap crap compared to dura-ace but dura-ace only goes up to 16t....also this is probably a dumb question but do you need a special tool to tighten (and loosen) the lockring on a fixie??

Last edited by datlas; 10-03-08 at 09:51 AM.
datlas is offline  
Old 10-03-08, 09:57 AM
  #12  
Team Beer
 
Cynikal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sacramento CA
Posts: 6,339

Bikes: Too Many

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Liked 159 Times in 104 Posts
Originally Posted by 2new2this
I agree. Now that I looked at my bike again on BD I might have to do a full drivetrain upgrade, as I want a 1/8" chain/cog/chainring. You might also look into this, if you have some cash to spare. That way you could bump your chainring down to 42/44 and run a 16/17 fixed/free or something along those lines. I am glad to hear you are enjoying the bike though.
I wouldn't consider going to 1/8th that much of an upgrade. You find no real utility (read strength, durability, ect...) in the switch. There are a ton of cheap options for chains and gear in 3/32. Just my 2 cents.
__________________
I'm not one for fawning over bicycles, but I do believe that our bikes communicate with us, and what this bike is saying is, "You're an idiot." BikeSnobNYC
Cynikal is offline  
Old 10-03-08, 10:00 AM
  #13  
Head Chief
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: kettering ohio
Posts: 332

Bikes: Motobecane Messenger

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Cynikal
I wouldn't consider going to 1/8th that much of an upgrade. You find no real utility (read strength, durability, ect...) in the switch. There are a ton of cheap options for chains and gear in 3/32. Just my 2 cents.
The only reason I am worried about it, is that I will be riding on a decent amount of hills, and I want durability. Thank you for the advice, though. I will probably keep it 3/32" for the first 3-4 weeks at least, now that you mention it. If I have problems, then I will switch.
2new2this is offline  
Old 10-03-08, 10:03 AM
  #14  
Team Beer
 
Cynikal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sacramento CA
Posts: 6,339

Bikes: Too Many

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Liked 159 Times in 104 Posts
The only way you will break a chain is usually user error. A geared bike will apply much more torque to a chain then a SS will. Keep your bike clean and in decent working order and you will be fine.
__________________
I'm not one for fawning over bicycles, but I do believe that our bikes communicate with us, and what this bike is saying is, "You're an idiot." BikeSnobNYC
Cynikal is offline  
Old 10-03-08, 10:21 AM
  #15  
Pants are for suckaz
 
HandsomeRyan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Mt. Airy, MD
Posts: 2,578

Bikes: Hardtail MTB, Fixed gear, and Commuter bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by 2new2this
The only reason I am worried about it, is that I will be riding on a decent amount of hills, and I want durability.
The stock chain is fine, no need to replace it. You'll put a lot more stress on the chain skidding than backpedaling down hills.

Originally Posted by Sheldon Brown
I would generally advise using the 3/32" (derailer) size. It is lighter, more compatible with your existing chainwheels, and likely to run smoother if the chainline is less than perfect, due to beveled side plates. In my experience, 3/32" chain is no less durable or reliable than 1/8".
HandsomeRyan is offline  
Old 10-03-08, 10:30 AM
  #16  
Head Chief
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: kettering ohio
Posts: 332

Bikes: Motobecane Messenger

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Well I have to trust the master on this one. I will be running both brakes for a bit anyway, and I have no in skidding my way around town
2new2this is offline  
Old 10-03-08, 10:44 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,544
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
A lot more R&D goes into 3/32" chains than 1/8" chains, so unless you are planning on switching chainrings a lot and are using a 144bcd crank, 3/32" might be better.
Yoshi is offline  
Old 10-03-08, 12:08 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 205

Bikes: 2007 ICE Trice T; 2008 Brompton M6L; 2009 Surly LHT; 2010 Surly Cross Check

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I commute in pretty hilly (though not terribly brutal) terrain just fine with a 46/16 after having been on the free side with 46/17 for a while. I do OK with no foot retention and brakes. (Yay Grip Kings!) I agree that the difference is more significant for downhill; anything less than what I've got and I'd be spinning way too much (or more likely, leaning on the brakes a lot more).

Don't be afraid to use the brakes! I've had to remind myself a few times that if the cadence is getting too much I can just brake--no need to be all macho about it and get ejected in the middle of traffic.
J B Bell is offline  
Old 10-03-08, 12:27 PM
  #19  
.
 
bbattle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Rocket City, No'ala
Posts: 12,760

Bikes: 2014 Trek Domane 5.2, 1985 Pinarello Treviso, 1990 Gardin Shred, 2006 Bianchi San Jose

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 28 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by Yoshi
I put a freewheel on my fixed-gear commuter, flipped the wheel and never went back to fixed. Different strokes, I suppose.

I think that the larger freewheel idea has a lot to do with going downhill - on a fixed-gear a large cog is going to require a high cadence when going downhill but with a freewheel you can just coast.
If it wasn't for this big-@ss hill on my commute I would've kept it fixed but it's so nice to coast down that bugger, especially in the afternoon. I can hog the lane and go 35mph all the way down. Riding fixed, I had to scrub speed with the brakes to keep from bouncing off the saddle.

Sheldon's advice is based on the assumption you would be riding fixed all the time and have singlespeed as backup for when you got too far from home and/or had too many hills to navigate. The easier ss gear would let you rest a bit.
bbattle is offline  
Old 10-03-08, 12:28 PM
  #20  
Ketchup
 
middy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 464
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked 8 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by datlas
do you need a special tool to tighten (and loosen) the lockring on a fixie??
You could use a punch and a hammer, but it's much better to get a hook spanner. The Park HCW-5 is less than $15.
middy is offline  
Old 10-03-08, 01:46 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
jmio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 611

Bikes: raleigh carbon competition, trek 6500 hardtail

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
i ordered the kilo tt, it comes with 48/16 combo, but I live in ohio, probably one of the flattest, ****tiest states there is. so I probably won't change anything.
jmio is offline  
Old 10-03-08, 02:32 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,025
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The whole gear your Fixed side higher than your freewheel side is kind of silly unless you live in a super hilly area, in which case I would personally run SS or get a geared bike.

Ive been running a 46t front, and the 17/19 dingleberry rear. Ive primarily been riding the 17t, but I find that that is really alot of gear inches to be running on flat ground, since I find myself mashing around all the time, instead of spinning at a higher rpm..having bad knees this is kind of getting old:/ That might also be a good solution to the gear dillema.

Last edited by clink83; 10-03-08 at 02:44 PM.
clink83 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.