Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 21 of 21
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    SoCal
    My Bikes
    1982 3Rensho, 1996 Serotta Atlanta-Spruce, 1996 Serotta Atlants-fade, 2012 Cannondale CAAD 10, 2008 Jamis Sputnik
    Posts
    2,089
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    175mm cranks_Too long?

    I saw some Dura Ace track cranks on Craigs list that are 175mm long. I am used to 170mm and haven't had a toe overlap problem yet. I have a conversion with about 9 1/2 inches of BB clearance.

    It sounds like a good deal_$160 for crank, bb and a Vuelta chain ring. Brand new the crank is like $300.

    Any input would be welcome.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    244
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Try it, you can always sell later if they don't work out.

  3. #3
    One skid from blown knees bigbris1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    910
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I ran 175s with no problem. They did tend to wanna make me bounce when I was spinning fast tho.
    Quote Originally Posted by 91MF View Post
    bigbris stopped two runaway busses riding brakeless one time.

    the moral of the story: riding brakeless saves lives.

    i am serious.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Menlo Park, CA
    My Bikes
    GT Forte Ti, Specialized Tricross Sport, Specialized Langster, Bianchi Fremont, Xootr Swift
    Posts
    2,171
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by tmh657 View Post
    I saw some Dura Ace track cranks on Craigs list that are 175mm long. I am used to 170mm and haven't had a toe overlap problem yet. I have a conversion with about 9 1/2 inches of BB clearance.

    It sounds like a good deal_$160 for crank, bb and a Vuelta chain ring. Brand new the crank is like $300.

    Any input would be welcome.
    i run 175s on my mtbs and that's what i was used to. they are better for leverage but as mentioned not as good for spinning. when i started riding fixed my cranks were 172.5 and even with those i get a bit of pedal strike every now and then. personally i feel shorter cranks are better for road/fixed bikes but ymmv.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    SoCal
    My Bikes
    1982 3Rensho, 1996 Serotta Atlanta-Spruce, 1996 Serotta Atlants-fade, 2012 Cannondale CAAD 10, 2008 Jamis Sputnik
    Posts
    2,089
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks for the input. I think I will get them if they look ok and see how it works.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    213
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    id be wary of pedal strike with 175's on the street, but youll probably be ok

  7. #7
    Senior Member TheSodaJerk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    166
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yea, I use 170s on my conversion but dont really get too much pedal strike. Sounds like a deal that you could flip if you dont like how it works out.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    West Lafayette, IN
    My Bikes
    Uno Pista NJS (by Fujishiro), NYCbikes cityfixed, '85 Centurian Dave Scott, Witcomb Track Bike
    Posts
    88
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Sounds like a good deal..i would take it. Although im running 170 mm on my conversion and would like to have a little shorter.

  9. #9
    Boardwalk Loving ERabbit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Newp$
    My Bikes
    Age? 58cm De Bernardi, White Surfside Cruiser, Neon Green Tandem
    Posts
    100
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i have 175 campy's on my de bernardi conversion with no problem (frame is a 58)
    Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense.
    -Buddha

  10. #10
    don't misunderestimate me BoSoxYacht's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    take your time, enjoy the scenery, it will be there when you get to it
    My Bikes
    07 IRO BFGB fixed-gear, 07 Pedal Force RS
    Posts
    5,341
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I run 175s on all my bikes so that I won't notice any change when switching between bike(but Ihave very long legs). I'd buy 'em, and flip 'em if there's a problem.

  11. #11
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    20
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I run 175's on my conversion and have some problems with pedal strike, but once you get used to it, it's fine. There's definitely some bouncing when I'm spinning out, but I like the extra torque i get wheN I'm running 82 GI.

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    SoCal
    My Bikes
    1982 3Rensho, 1996 Serotta Atlanta-Spruce, 1996 Serotta Atlants-fade, 2012 Cannondale CAAD 10, 2008 Jamis Sputnik
    Posts
    2,089
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I bought the crank set. The Dura Ace words are mostly rubbed off the arms from straps but otherwise in good shape. Looks like only track ridden.
    Will install tomorrow and report back.
    48t chain ring, I need a 17t cog now for 77.8 GI.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    SoCal
    My Bikes
    1982 3Rensho, 1996 Serotta Atlanta-Spruce, 1996 Serotta Atlants-fade, 2012 Cannondale CAAD 10, 2008 Jamis Sputnik
    Posts
    2,089
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Install is done and went for a test ride. It feels good just different since it has 144 bcd, 175mm arms and the rear wheel is now all the way to the front of the drop outs.

    Bike has 2 different wheels since I am not sure if I will go with the deep v's or the silver low flange hubs.

    Here's some pics.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    SoCal
    My Bikes
    1982 3Rensho, 1996 Serotta Atlanta-Spruce, 1996 Serotta Atlants-fade, 2012 Cannondale CAAD 10, 2008 Jamis Sputnik
    Posts
    2,089
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I switched back to the 172.5mm Sugino messengers today to compare. There seems to be more of a pedal strike issue with the 172.5's than the Dura Ace 175mm because the DA cranks have a narrower Q factor. The inside of the crank arm on the DA is almost touching the chain where as the crank on the messenger is a good 1/2 " or more from the chain.

    I think this is a correct assumption. Tell me if I am wrong.

    Also does it make any difference in acceleration with 144 bcd on the DA as opposed to 130 bcd on the messenger?

    I know I am over thinking it...

  15. #15
    Dinosaur on wheels Lennysody's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    'sconsin
    My Bikes
    Specialized Allez Sport Triple, 1970's Peugot, Schwinn World
    Posts
    101
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm sorry to break up this thread a bit, but I just have a basic question. I'm new to the single speed/fixed gear world and am currently working on a build. I have a flip-flop hub, but I'm wondering what is the best gear ratios/ crank length. I'm not sure if my size would make a huge difference (6-6" 230) on gear ratios/ crank length. Any help would be appreciated-thanks

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    244
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by tmh657 View Post
    I switched back to the 172.5mm Sugino messengers today to compare. There seems to be more of a pedal strike issue with the 172.5's than the Dura Ace 175mm because the DA cranks have a narrower Q factor. The inside of the crank arm on the DA is almost touching the chain where as the crank on the messenger is a good 1/2 " or more from the chain.

    I think this is a correct assumption. Tell me if I am wrong.

    Also does it make any difference in acceleration with 144 bcd on the DA as opposed to 130 bcd on the messenger?

    I know I am over thinking it...
    Bolt circle diameter has NO effect on acceleration that you could possibly feel. The diameter of the chain ring and length of crank arm are the critical parts of the geometry. Where the chainring is attached to the crank makes very little difference (it is just a trade off between size of the spider and the geometry of the chain ring and doesn't affect gear ratio at all.

  17. #17
    cab horn
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Toronto
    My Bikes
    1987 Bianchi Campione
    Posts
    28,295
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    16 posts with nary a whisper about the OP's height, which generally dictates crank length. Go bikeforums.
    Mes compaingnons cui j'amoie et cui j'aim,... Me di, chanson.

  18. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    SoCal
    My Bikes
    1982 3Rensho, 1996 Serotta Atlanta-Spruce, 1996 Serotta Atlants-fade, 2012 Cannondale CAAD 10, 2008 Jamis Sputnik
    Posts
    2,089
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by operator View Post
    16 posts with nary a whisper about the OP's height, which generally dictates crank length. Go bikeforums.
    I am 6' 1" with a 34" inseam.

  19. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Alameda, Ca
    My Bikes
    Surly Steamroller, Broakland Pipe Bomb
    Posts
    115
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm 6'2" and have one bike with a 170 and another with 165 and I really like the 165 a lot better. The tighter radius feels more natural especially when I'm spinning faster...plus I can hit corners harder. The two bikes have pretty different geometries though (surly steamroller and broakland pipebomb) so that might play a role in it as well.
    Everything Louder Than Everything Else

  20. #20
    Ths Hipstr Kills Masheenz cc700's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    seattle
    My Bikes
    tirove
    Posts
    8,545
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i have 175 on my road bike and 165 on my track bike.

    it's really more important to have a bike that fits and a spin that you can get on top of. if you're tall i'd say go for the 175. if you're really short or have a low bb then beware.

  21. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    SoCal
    My Bikes
    1982 3Rensho, 1996 Serotta Atlanta-Spruce, 1996 Serotta Atlants-fade, 2012 Cannondale CAAD 10, 2008 Jamis Sputnik
    Posts
    2,089
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by cc700 View Post
    i have 175 on my road bike and 165 on my track bike.

    it's really more important to have a bike that fits and a spin that you can get on top of. if you're tall i'd say go for the 175. if you're really short or have a low bb then beware.
    Could you tell me what you mean by getting on top of the spin?

    Also I have no problem with pedal strike and the 175mm. I may have mentioned that the only real way to get a good comparison would be to jump from a 175mm bike to a 170mm or shorter crank and feel the difference. Of course there couldn't be too many other variables, say one bike being a Pista concept and the other a Windsor Hour.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •