Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    kfm
    kfm is offline
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    NYC / Brooklyn
    Posts
    125
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    track/road frame geometry

    i want to design a frame with road geometry. does anyone have specific information as to how geometry is factored (beyond the assumed)? i've looked around the web a bit, & it seems like most frame builders work off of standards that they tweak a little here an there. i'm curious, because otherwise the process seems very abstract. lower bottom bracket, more fork rake, longer stays, looser seat & head tube angles... but how do i figure out how much (given my inseam & size).

    thanks

  2. #2
    BEHOLD! THE MANTICORE! rotharpunc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    54914
    Posts
    1,797
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I am guessing better responses may await this question in the frame building sub forum. those guys are pretty helpful.

  3. #3
    kfm
    kfm is offline
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    NYC / Brooklyn
    Posts
    125
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    yup, i posted it there as well.

  4. #4
    A little North of Hell
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    4,394
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    there are lots of different takes on geometry...

    "Eddy MerckxCenturyGeometry",Lemond,European,Italian,Classics,
    Sloping,Compact,Crit,blah blah....

    have fun...

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bicycle...Frame_geometry
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    XXXI

  5. #5
    not actually Nickatina andre nickatina's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    OR
    Posts
    4,447
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Typical road geometry is 73 degree head tube, 73 degree seat tube with 40-45mm rake depending on how you want to tweak the trail. This is "all-around" road geometry, and has been more or less the standard for a long time because it works. The 73 degree seat tube keeps things a little more comfortable because it means inherently longer chainstays and fits a large amount of riders for fore-aft seat position. The 73 HT/40-45mm works very well for how one would want a road bike to handle on the road. The greater-BB drop (lower BB height) means more dampening inherent in the longer stays, as well as lower center of gravity which is much desired when doing long, winding descents.

    Steepening the head tube and seat tube/lessening the rake results in a tighter wheelbase, more stiffness inherent in the geometry (a steeper HT/less rake will give less dampening and more road feel up front, while also stiffening the front end; a steeper ST/shorter chain stay means more of the "acceleration-happy" feel and less dampening) and more "criterium" geometry, less suited for riding all day in the saddle. Crit geometry is somewhere between traditional road and traditional track geometry.

    Read the geometry chapter of the Paterek Manual for Framebuilders for a good expansion on all this stuff. Also, Dave Moulton's bike blog is a good resource, as is frameforum.org

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Calgary AB
    My Bikes
    kilo tt
    Posts
    302
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    great info

  7. #7
    kfm
    kfm is offline
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    NYC / Brooklyn
    Posts
    125
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by andre nickatina View Post
    Typical road geometry is 73 degree head tube, 73 degree seat tube with 40-45mm rake depending on how you want to tweak the trail. This is "all-around" road geometry, and has been more or less the standard for a long time because it works. The 73 degree seat tube keeps things a little more comfortable because it means inherently longer chainstays and fits a large amount of riders for fore-aft seat position. The 73 HT/40-45mm works very well for how one would want a road bike to handle on the road. The greater-BB drop (lower BB height) means more dampening inherent in the longer stays, as well as lower center of gravity which is much desired when doing long, winding descents.

    Steepening the head tube and seat tube/lessening the rake results in a tighter wheelbase, more stiffness inherent in the geometry (a steeper HT/less rake will give less dampening and more road feel up front, while also stiffening the front end; a steeper ST/shorter chain stay means more of the "acceleration-happy" feel and less dampening) and more "criterium" geometry, less suited for riding all day in the saddle. Crit geometry is somewhere between traditional road and traditional track geometry.

    Read the geometry chapter of the Paterek Manual for Framebuilders for a good expansion on all this stuff. Also, Dave Moulton's bike blog is a good resource, as is frameforum.org
    excellent, thanks

  8. #8
    Old fart JohnDThompson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Appleton WI
    My Bikes
    Several, mostly not name brands.
    Posts
    12,984
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by kfm View Post
    i want to design a frame with road geometry. does anyone have specific information as to how geometry is factored (beyond the assumed)? i've looked around the web a bit, & it seems like most frame builders work off of standards that they tweak a little here an there. i'm curious, because otherwise the process seems very abstract. lower bottom bracket, more fork rake, longer stays, looser seat & head tube angles... but how do i figure out how much (given my inseam & size).

    thanks
    Try this:

    Bicycle Geometery 101

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •