42t vs larger chainring
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 176
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
42t vs larger chainring
Hey all,
I bought a sugino messenger crankset, but the chainring is 42t (bought it off of a brand new specialized singlecross). I know all I have to do is get the correct cog, but I was wondering, are there any advantages of having a bigger chainring and cog even though they carry the same ratio as my smaller setup?
Thanks
J
I bought a sugino messenger crankset, but the chainring is 42t (bought it off of a brand new specialized singlecross). I know all I have to do is get the correct cog, but I was wondering, are there any advantages of having a bigger chainring and cog even though they carry the same ratio as my smaller setup?
Thanks
J
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Eugene, OR
Posts: 593
Bikes: Jamis XLT 2.0, Kona Fire Mountain
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
less wear on your components = longer lifespan.
With a smaller chainring, you get more effect from changing the number of teeth in the back though.
With a smaller chainring, you get more effect from changing the number of teeth in the back though.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Athens, Ohio
Posts: 1,568
Bikes: Fuji Track, Half built 70s Azuki
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
a larger chainring would let you run higher gears because cogs only go down to like 12 or 13 teeth, i think.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,694
Bikes: A few BSO's.
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 164 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 55 Times
in
27 Posts
Larger chainring = looks better and that's really all that matters. j/k
I had a 42t messenger and it was great. I ran a fixed/fixed hub with 14t/15t and really worked good.
I got a DA track crank for a good deal so now its 49t and 17t.
There's tons of threads on this exact subject. As usual...search.
I had a 42t messenger and it was great. I ran a fixed/fixed hub with 14t/15t and really worked good.
I got a DA track crank for a good deal so now its 49t and 17t.
There's tons of threads on this exact subject. As usual...search.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Eugene, OR
Posts: 593
Bikes: Jamis XLT 2.0, Kona Fire Mountain
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I think you should keep the 42 teeth until/unless you're looking to get a gearing that you can't accomplish with that number of teeth up front.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Van BC
Posts: 3,744
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
OP, you'll be fine with 42. Personally I wouldn't think it was worth it to swap chainrings unless you can get something for cheap or free.
#8
Senior Member
#9
partly metal, partly real
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Philadelphia.
Posts: 3,597
Bikes: Hummer H2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
i don't like threads like this, but i've heard from a number of sources that everything else the same, smaller rings are louder than bigger rings.
cannot tell you true it is, but a few people have said it. "a few people" say lots of stuff that ends up being bs though, so take it with a grain of salt.
cannot tell you true it is, but a few people have said it. "a few people" say lots of stuff that ends up being bs though, so take it with a grain of salt.
#10
Senior Member
i don't like threads like this, but i've heard from a number of sources that everything else the same, smaller rings are louder than bigger rings.
cannot tell you true it is, but a few people have said it. "a few people" say lots of stuff that ends up being bs though, so take it with a grain of salt.
cannot tell you true it is, but a few people have said it. "a few people" say lots of stuff that ends up being bs though, so take it with a grain of salt.
#11
Lifer
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 250
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
You could buy a bunch of chains for what it would cost to get a new chainring and cog (oh and a new chain if you don't have extra links). If you want to replace it, do it when the one you have is getting worn out, or when you decide you don't like how it looks.
The advantage of what you have is that you can get a lowish gearing with less expensive Dura Ace cogs. Why DA cogs cost less than the larger Surly ones is a mystery of the universe, but you can take advantage of it with your current setup.
The advantage of what you have is that you can get a lowish gearing with less expensive Dura Ace cogs. Why DA cogs cost less than the larger Surly ones is a mystery of the universe, but you can take advantage of it with your current setup.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,694
Bikes: A few BSO's.
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 164 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 55 Times
in
27 Posts
That's why I have a 17t Surly and it did cost $30. That's about the same cost as an EAI cog which is allegedly better quality but it was out of stock everywhere at the time.