Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    70
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Conversion vs tarck bike.

    This has been bugging me since I ride a kilo(tarck? cheap) and my friend rides a crappy conversion. Other than the drop outs, whats the main difference in a track frame and road/fixie conversion. I honestly dislike conversions, but sometimes some are hard to tell.
    Thanks

  2. #2
    career-courier
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    N.W England
    My Bikes
    Alien frame build
    Posts
    92
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    track frames generally have tighter geometry, 120mm rear spacing and sometimes have no holes drilled for brakes or bottle cages.
    I talk to my track bike at night...

  3. #3
    * adriano's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Baltimore
    My Bikes
    http://velospace.org/node/18951
    Posts
    6,890
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    bottom bracket height can become an issue on some conversions.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawaii
    Posts
    306
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Conversions are sometimes incompatible with tight pants.

  5. #5
    Lost AngryScientist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    nutley, nj
    Posts
    4,450
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    track bikes also have track ends, whereas conversions will usually have semi-horizontal drop outs

  6. #6
    cab horn
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Toronto
    My Bikes
    1987 Bianchi Campione
    Posts
    28,295
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If you're riding on the road (especially commuting), then you're probably better off with a conversion. A crappy conversion is going to be equal to or better than the kilo tt anyways.
    Mes compaingnons cui j'amoie et cui j'aim,... Me di, chanson.

  7. #7
    cab horn
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Toronto
    My Bikes
    1987 Bianchi Campione
    Posts
    28,295
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by AngryScientist View Post
    track bikes also have track ends, whereas conversions will usually have semi-horizontal drop outs
    Yeah, a ***** if you have fenders and you need to change a rear flat.
    Mes compaingnons cui j'amoie et cui j'aim,... Me di, chanson.

  8. #8
    Senior Member skeletor3000's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Portland, OR
    My Bikes
    Cannondale R600 CAAD5, 1973 Takara, 2009 Mercier Kilo TT
    Posts
    179
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by operator View Post
    If you're riding on the road (especially commuting), then you're probably better off with a conversion. A crappy conversion is going to be equal to or better than the kilo tt anyways.
    Not to be nitpicky, but uh... are you implying that a ****ty older bike is better than a ****ty newer bike?

    Cuz that seems kind of dumb.

  9. #9
    everyday I'm hustlin' brandonspeck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Portland, OR
    My Bikes
    Surly Crosscheck, Surly Steamrolla
    Posts
    453
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    depends on your resources, honestly. Converting an old road bike teaches you a lot about bike mechanics right off the bat, so you sort of know what you're doing. It's also pretty fun, and it's fulfilling. That being said, you need to find a frame or a bike that would be good for a conversion, (Semi-horizontal dropouts). Since fixed gear is really popular, the market for these bikes is pretty limited, so you're either going to find a ****ty bike that would make for a ****ty conversion, or a nicer road bike that wouldn't be worth converting.

    That being said, there's nothing wrong with getting an off-the-shelf fixed gear/track bike. Kilo's are great beginning bikes, and as you replace components as you need to, you'll learn about mechanics and components.
    "I think it’s dumb when you take the inherently fun like riding bikes and singing songs and say they’re not for everyone as if for your whole life you were cool as $h!t."

    -Bomb the Music Industry!

  10. #10
    Nymphomaniactionhero RichPugh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Baltimore, MD
    My Bikes
    07' Specialized Langster Comp, 04' Bianchi Pista Concept
    Posts
    496
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by operator View Post
    A crappy conversion is going to be equal to or better than the kilo tt anyways.
    False to the max... A crappy conversion is always going to be crappy. A nice conversion will undoubtably be fair. A Kilo TT starts above fair and can easily get into the above fair category. The Kilo TT pro starts well above fair and thats just with better components and a brake. Conversion haters will always hate. Conversion lovers will always stand proud. Track bike elite will always be right no matter what anyone else thinks anyway so it doesnt matter...

    A Kilo TT does not qualify as tarck unless a decent measure of tarck has been added. It's a classic design single speed bike that comes with a fixed driveline, has less than track geometry but more than road geometry, well used track fork ends, track-esque bb height, 120/100 track hub spacing, an attractive lugged fork and an affordable entry level pricing. That, compared to the majority of conversions, places it significantly higher up the nice scale than most give it credit for.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •