Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Baka dakara supercub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Honolulu
    Posts
    395
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Yet another fork rake question

    I'm in the market for a carbon fork. Stock fork has a 40mm rake, and I pretty much like the handling.

    I'm looking at the Alpha Q CS10. It's decently priced and looks to be durable. It's kind of ugly, but i like kind of ugly stuff. The problem is that it has a 44mm rake. Will this significantly change handling properties. I've heard a few mm doesn't have much affect, but 4 mm might be pushing it. Will my bike loose its crisp handling?

    Along the same lines, does anyone have a recommendation for a carbon fork with alloy or steel steerer in the $200 range. Around 40mm rake and 1 1/8.

    Thanks!

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Rohnert Park, CA
    My Bikes
    Pake track, Soma DoubleCross, LeMond Etape, Maruishi RoadAce 303
    Posts
    1,248
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If you like the handling your bike has now, I'd try to get something closer to being identical to your current setup. That said, 4mm of difference isn't a HUGE different.

    Also, an essential measurement to take into consideration is the axle-to-crown length, as it will also change the handling. For instance, take a fork with a rake of 40 and an axle-to-crown length of 175cm. If you change to a fork with a rake of 44 and an axle-to-crown length of 168, it actually might feel around the same because the trail might be similar (I am of course just pulling numbers out of the air, so this won't be precise at all). You could do a simple geometry calculation if you have the head tube angle, as well. I have been told that an alright rule of thumb regarding forks indicates that for every 10mm of axle-to-crown length, the head tube angle changes by about a degree.

  3. #3
    out of shape
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    va
    Posts
    1,456
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    if you plan to spend 200usd and have some patience, you can likely score a new full carbon fork on ebay with the specs you want. look at reynolds ouzo pros, eastons, and columbus.

    that said, adding 4mm to rake will slightly decrease your trail, making your bike less stable. it's arguable whether that makes it 'twitchy' or 'agile'.

  4. #4
    Framebuilder
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    485
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ***anectdotal evidence warning***
    Assuming the same axle to crown height, you won't notice a 4mm change in rake.
    I used to wonder about these things, so awhile back I made four fixed frames with minor geometry changes in each one and four forks with 30- 60 mm rakes. Among other things, I found that a 10mm rake change was noticeable, but anything less wasn't.
    FWIW, I found the forks with higher rakes to be preferable for fixed riding.

    Good luck in your search.

  5. #5
    Baka dakara supercub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Honolulu
    Posts
    395
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks for everyone's input. Figuring out trail is kind of interesting. I had no idea that a fork is so integral to the handling of the bike.

    Regarding the axle to crown length; the stock fork is about 381mm (with 40mm rake) and the Alpha-Q is 371mm (with 44mm rake). Assuming I'm getting this right, the difference in rake is somewhat offset (no pun intended) by the shorter length of the Alpha-Q blades. Is that right?

  6. #6
    Framebuilder
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    485
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by supercub View Post
    Thanks for everyone's input. Figuring out trail is kind of interesting. I had no idea that a fork is so integral to the handling of the bike.

    Regarding the axle to crown length; the stock fork is about 381mm (with 40mm rake) and the Alpha-Q is 371mm (with 44mm rake). Assuming I'm getting this right, the difference in rake is somewhat offset (no pun intended) by the shorter length of the Alpha-Q blades. Is that right?

    Actually, that would be enough of a change to notice a difference. The shorter fork combined with more rake would steepn the head angle and lower the trail making the bike more sensitive to steering input.
    Whether that change is god or bad is up to you.
    Personally, I think it's good for a fixed gear as you'll never be going all that fast on it.

  7. #7
    -
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Banned in DC
    Posts
    454
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by supercub View Post
    Regarding the axle to crown length; the stock fork is about 381mm (with 40mm rake) and the Alpha-Q is 371mm (with 44mm rake). Assuming I'm getting this right, the difference in rake is somewhat offset (no pun intended) by the shorter length of the Alpha-Q blades. Is that right?
    The shorter fork with more rake will MULTIPLY the magnitude of the change, not offset it. More rake makes the steering quicker, and the shorter fork increases the head tube angle, which also makes the steering quicker.
    I have a front brake, but I only use it for slowing or stopping.

  8. #8
    Baka dakara supercub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Honolulu
    Posts
    395
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Ah, I see. Thanks for the correction.

    One more thing. All else being equal, will a fork with a steel steerer be potentially stronger and more durable than an all carbon fork? I realize it will be heavier.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •