Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 15 of 15
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    44
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Kilo TT vs. Surly Steamroller

    I'm in need of a new ride (my conversion has served me well for 8 years but its time for a rehab) and it's basically between these two. I know they're not necessarily in the exact same class but hence the dilemma.

    Pluses for the Kilo (non pro version, none up for order right now in my size) are obviously the cost, which is almost crazy at $350. Pluses for the Surly are that I can be more active in the build at the bike shop, and maybe bring some of the nicer components from my conversion to the build to bring cost down a little.

    So my question to you knowledgeable Kilo/Steamroller riders is what are the biggest differentiation points to these framesets that you see (and, in turn, the stock complete build offered by both). I really dig that '09 Creamroller color but having an extra $350 for components on the Kilo is pretty appealing. But the Creamroller I could be riding tomorrow out the door of the bike shop! Decisions.

    Any help/comments are awesome.

  2. #2
    everyday I'm hustlin' brandonspeck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Portland, OR
    My Bikes
    Surly Crosscheck, Surly Steamrolla
    Posts
    453
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I had a Kilo TT frameset, but I ditched it for a steamroller.
    Trust me, you want the steamroller.
    "I think it’s dumb when you take the inherently fun like riding bikes and singing songs and say they’re not for everyone as if for your whole life you were cool as $h!t."

    -Bomb the Music Industry!

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    44
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Perfect subject for brain picking. What about the steamroller makes you happier?

  4. #4
    everyday I'm hustlin' brandonspeck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Portland, OR
    My Bikes
    Surly Crosscheck, Surly Steamrolla
    Posts
    453
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    For me it was the clearance. I ride smaller bikes (50cm Kilo) and the clearance was just too tight. I had a 48t chainring with a 16t cog, and with a 25mm tire, it left about half a centimeter from the seat tube. Keep in mind this is probably because I was riding a smaller frame. The steamroller fits my 32mm cross tires no problem, and I even have some clip-on fenders that just barely fit. I had to buy a different brake though, but the FFF chainstays made the deal. I was sort of hell-bent on getting a more aggressive track geometry, but I found that the Steamroller is a perfect balance of tightness and comfort.

    As far as completes go, the components on the Surly are a bit better. I've heard god-awful things about the Kilo's wheelset. The wheels on the surly are much better, and Surly themselves make a pretty decent hub. Only thing I'd change on the steamroller is the seat.
    "I think it’s dumb when you take the inherently fun like riding bikes and singing songs and say they’re not for everyone as if for your whole life you were cool as $h!t."

    -Bomb the Music Industry!

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    346
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Well.....Differences in frames are:
    (Looking at the 53cm c-c frames of each)

    Kilo=Reynolds 520 (4130 Crmo made by reynolds)
    Steamroller=4130 tubing (basically the same **** that's on the Kilo)

    Kilo BB drop=6cm Steamroller BB drop=7cm

    Kilo HT angle=72.5 Steamroller HT angle=73.5

    Kilo ST angle=74 Steamroller ST angle=73.5

    Kilo wheelbase=98cm Steamroller Wheelbase=97.9cm

    Kilo Top Tube=54.8cm Steamroller TT=56.8cm

    Kilo chainstay=40.3cm Steamroller chainstay=39.8cm



    You might get a little better fit and finish on the welds and paint job on the Steamroller.....But I'd go with the Kilo because of the higher BB, the shorter TT (for me better), and the steeper ST angle (I like the little bit laxer angle of the HT for street riding).

    Frame material is about the same, so it's not a factor. If you want a lighter (thinner walled tubing), you could opt for something with Reynolds 631 like the IRO angus, etc...

    And use the money you save to get some bad ass upgraded parts.

  6. #6
    everyday I'm hustlin' brandonspeck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Portland, OR
    My Bikes
    Surly Crosscheck, Surly Steamrolla
    Posts
    453
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Have you ridden the steamroller? I say have the LBS get you to test ride it. The frame fitting is all preference. I personally prefer more slack seat tube, etc.

    For a comparison to the Kilo, try test riding a KHS Flite. I think that has the same geometry (Correct me if I'm wrong)
    "I think it’s dumb when you take the inherently fun like riding bikes and singing songs and say they’re not for everyone as if for your whole life you were cool as $h!t."

    -Bomb the Music Industry!

  7. #7
    .
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    90
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The steamroller is defiantly worth the extra bit of cash!

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    44
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yeah, I'm really leaning hard toward the Kilo I think. Either of these bikes are going to feel like a Rolls compared to my beater, and an extra $350 for upgrades is nothing to sneeze at.

  9. #9
    monster
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    707
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ^Smart choice. I can't see spending the extra cash for a Steamroller.

  10. #10
    Comanche Racing PedallingATX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Deep in the heart of Texas
    My Bikes
    Presto NJS build, Specialized Allez Pro w/ full Dura Ace and Ksyrium SLs, 1990something Specialized Sirrus
    Posts
    2,822
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    get an IRO Angus/Mark V. For price of steamroller, you can have much better components and better tubing.
    skinnytire

  11. #11
    degeared
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    490
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I love my Steamroller. One of the big advantages IMO is the FFF. You can fit 38's in there, if you wanted/needed to. If that's not an issue, perhaps the Kilo is a better choice. I personally won't ever buy from BD, but whatever.

  12. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    44
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You have a problem with BD?

    I'm running skinny tires all the way so that shouldn't be an issue here.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    346
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Then get the kilo. There really isn't a reason to get the Steamroller if you're using this on the streets and you're not going to use anything bigger than 28mm's.

    Save your money and get some nice wheels, etc...

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    1,637
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I am hoping by Late July this question will be much easier to answer









    stock - 32c
    but plenty of room for 42c or more
    and fenders etc
    http://www.bikesdirect.com

    "First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." – Mahatma Gandhi

  15. #15
    jpdesjar
    Guest
    steamer!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •