Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    58
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    three chain ring single speeds

    I see a lot of bikes w/ two different size chain rings on there rear hub and they call them ss. Its probably not worth arguing but Is having the option to change speeds on the bike still considered a "real single speed". even though there is no derailleur, in a pinch you can still hop off the bike loosen the rear wheel and change speeds.

  2. #2
    armchair touring whoosh!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    NNY/Philly
    Posts
    299
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    In a way I guess it's a slippery slope. My late night web browsing bike-lust trains of thought usually go like this:

    "Maybe I should pick up a freewheel for the other side of my hub."
    "Ooh a dingle cog! If I got that and had two chainrings two teeth apart I'd have a trailer-pulling gear."
    "Those White Industries Dos freewheels are pretty rad. Maybe I could set one up with a DMR chain tug/mech hanger and a derailleur and have a shift-able 4-speed IRO. That'd be neato!"
    "Or... if I got that DMR hanger I could just build that old school 120mm spaced Campy Record 5-speed hub in the parts bin into a wheel!"

    "Wait, I'll just put an Xtracycle on my IRO! 1x9 FTW! I wonder if those things accommodate track-ends? hmmm..."


    So yeah, trying to versatilize [I just made a new word] your fixed gear leads you down a path that can only end with some sort of Big Dummy or downhill rig, haha!

  3. #3
    Senior Member beeftech's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Brooklyn finally.
    My Bikes
    Bianchi San Jose, fixed
    Posts
    832
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Then anybody running a flip flop hub is obviously not running a single speed, they can take that rear wheel off turn it around put it back on, and change gears in no time!

    Yes it's still a single speed, there is no mechanism that shifts the gears. You could put a million different sized cogs on a wheel, and if you had no way of mechanically shifting I would still call it a single speed.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    58
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    after giving it a great deal of thought I have come to the conclusion that as long as the rider is not getting off the bike half way through a ride and swapping gears it is a ss, but if the rider does get off the bike and change gears mid ride he or she should have to wear a shirt that says "I am a derailleur".

  5. #5
    Low car diet JiveTurkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Corvallis, OR, USA
    My Bikes
    2006 Windsor Dover w/105, 2007 GT Avalanche w/XT, 1995 Trek 820 setup for touring, 201? Yeah single-speed folder, 199? Huffy tandem.
    Posts
    2,383
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by akaerik21 View Post
    if the rider does get off the bike and change gears mid ride he or she should have to wear a shirt that says "I am a derailleur".
    Or one of these: http://www.getprice.com.au/images/up...xtr-ss-med.jpg
    Quote Originally Posted by slopvehicle View Post
    Not wearing a helmet makes me more aware of my surroundings. I find myself anticipating the hardness of concrete 50 or 100 feet in front of me, it's almost a zen-like connection between my face and the pavement.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    139
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    How bout we just make it easy. If you at any point during your ride have access to a different gearing than the one you started with, be it on another riders bike (that you ride with, or just pass), a bike store (that you can at any point on your ride walk or ride to), etc, you are not allowed to consider it a singlespeed because you could theoretically change the gearing during your ride.

    Seems easy enough to me.

  7. #7
    Senior Member Yellowbeard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    735
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    What is this, some sort of competitive flagellation? I know cycling is generally a masochistic sport, but who cares? A bike without shifters yet with multiple gears offers basically all the advantages of a single speed and adds some advantages of a multi-speed with hardly any of the disadvantages.

    I think a bike with a triple and a free/free flipflop spaced to carry a freewheel on one side and a pair of fixed cogs on the other side would make a bad-ass cross-country ride.
    I'll eat it first.

  8. #8
    curmudgeon psirue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    647
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Yellowbeard View Post
    I think a bike with a triple and a free/free flipflop spaced to carry a freewheel on one side and a pair of fixed cogs on the other side would make a bad-ass cross-country ride.
    ...what's the point? the number of teeth cannot be that radically different from each other, otherwise you'd need multiple chains, no?

    the way I see it is, if you need multiple gearings on your fixed-gear, you might be riding the wrong bike.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    139
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by psirue View Post
    ...what's the point? the number of teeth cannot be that radically different from each other, otherwise you'd need multiple chains, no?

    the way I see it is, if you need multiple gearings on your fixed-gear, you might be riding the wrong bike.
    I've had no issues going between a 15 and 18 with one chain, and 3 teeth is a decent difference.

    And there are times when being able to switch is nice. If I'm going on a long flat ride (and feel like taking the fixed) I throw one on, but if it's going to have rolling hills or a lot of stops (traffic stops and the such) I throw the other on.

  10. #10
    curmudgeon psirue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    647
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I guess it depends how long your chain is / how far your axle sits in the dropouts.

    nevermind, then.

  11. #11
    Overwhelming Undertaking? Overwhelming's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    72
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    This is the most ridiculous thread of the night.

    I like it.

  12. #12
    Senior Member Yellowbeard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    735
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by psirue View Post
    ...what's the point? the number of teeth cannot be that radically different from each other, otherwise you'd need multiple chains, no?

    the way I see it is, if you need multiple gearings on your fixed-gear, you might be riding the wrong bike.
    Think about it, dude. Each chain ring lines up with one of the three rear sprockets (the hub spacing is tweaked so that they do) then you pick the gears so that the same length chain works with each one.

    For example, 38x18 uses the same length chain as a 42x14 within less than a chain link, with a 30% reduction.

    Also, if I feel like riding a fixed gear then any bike with derailleurs is going to be the wrong bike, isn't it?
    Last edited by Yellowbeard; 07-21-09 at 11:06 AM. Reason: Added last sentence.
    I'll eat it first.

  13. #13
    . bbattle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Huntsville, Alabama
    My Bikes
    2014 Trek Domane 5.2, 1985 Pinarello Trevisio, 1991 Colnago Master, '06 Bianchi San Jose, 1987 Moulton Fuso, '80's Gardin Shred?, '82 John Howard(Dave Tesch)
    Posts
    11,709
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Yellowbeard View Post
    What is this, some sort of competitive flagellation? I know cycling is generally a masochistic sport, but who cares? A bike without shifters yet with multiple gears offers basically all the advantages of a single speed and adds some advantages of a multi-speed with hardly any of the disadvantages.

    I think a bike with a triple and a free/free flipflop spaced to carry a freewheel on one side and a pair of fixed cogs on the other side would make a bad-ass cross-country ride.
    Check this out

    48-44T chainrings with 20-17 Surly Dingle and 18T freewheel on the flipside. I ride mostly in the 48-17. Don't have quite enough dropout for the 44-17 but the 44-18 singlespeed side works if I need a "low" gear.
    Last edited by bbattle; 07-21-09 at 05:20 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •