Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 27
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    40
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    700x25 vs 700x23?

    Other than size...what's the actual difference between the two?

    I searched the forums and all i got was that people said they felt faster on the 23 than on the 25...

  2. #2
    Senior Member beeftech's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Brooklyn finally.
    My Bikes
    Bianchi San Jose, fixed
    Posts
    832
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It's the width of the tire measured in millimeters.
    25's with absorb more road vibrations, as there is more room for airs.

    And 2mm is hardly anything at all, if anyone felt "faster", it was probably placebo effect.
    **** I can hardly notice the difference going to 28's, but damn the ride is much more comfortable.


    If you really wanna go fast get some 20mm lolz

  3. #3
    Senior Member mihlbach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    6,319
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thats it....the size difference is the only difference. A larger tire obviously produces a different ride quality, but a difference of 2mm is very minor.

  4. #4
    ern
    ern is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    wild west
    Posts
    74
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i do notice a difference. i just changed from a 25 to 23 and the weight difference and rolling resistance is tiny but i can feel it. for the most part, its not really worth weighing the differences since it really is so a small.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Yellowbeard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    735
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    They probably overinflate their 23s and then feel faster because the tires are bouncing off the ground so often.
    I'll eat it first.

  6. #6
    mediocre member djeucalyptus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    nuevo mexico
    Posts
    208
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    in general, 23s are narrower, yielding a slightly narrower contact patch. As said, they're "smaller" so there's less air to absorb bumps, creating a stiffer (hence faster) ride.

    it's also worth mentioning that the 23 and 25 measures are somewhat arbitrary, and there can be a good bit of variance in the actual inflated width.

    I've seen a few "23s" that are almost imperceptibly different from "25s"
    Quote Originally Posted by operator View Post
    This is the internet dude. You're free to be an asshat.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Athens, Ohio
    My Bikes
    Fuji Track, Half built 70s Azuki
    Posts
    1,568
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i've been thinking of putting 28s on my iro now that it has gone from only bike to commuter only. Do 25s absorb vibrations noticeably better than 23s or should i just make the jump to 28s?

  8. #8
    Senior Member beeftech's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Brooklyn finally.
    My Bikes
    Bianchi San Jose, fixed
    Posts
    832
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've ridden a ton of tires.
    I find 28's to be the perfect mix of rolling resistance and shock absorption, at least in NYC.
    We have some pretty bad roads and Cobble stones.
    In Colorado I road 25's comfortably.

    If you have fairly smooth roads I'd say 25's.
    If you have flawless roads or don't mind riding on rocks go with 23's or less.

    If you want to ride on a cushion of air or live in a warzone, go with 32+, it is so awesome. You can ride over anything.
    Last edited by beeftech; 07-20-09 at 07:03 PM.

  9. #9
    Overwhelming Undertaking? Overwhelming's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    72
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I ride a 23 in the front and a 25 in the back.
    (Waiting for my back tire to finally become bald before replacing it)

    I like the look and feel of 23s, it feels more like a zippy sports car... or bike!

  10. #10
    Double Agent Astronomical's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    your girl's bed
    My Bikes
    Fly Pantera, GT GTB
    Posts
    1,187
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm with the 28c cushion crowd, I'm running two "full-bodied" 28c tires and they're a big improvement in ride quality over the 23c and 26c's which were nearly painful to ride on my GTB on bumpy roads.

  11. #11
    Loving Fixed Riding! DIRT BOY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    461
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Depends a LOT on your weight and road condtions

    Here: http://www.schwalbetires.com/tech_in...ing_resistance

    I use 28s on the Madison and 25s on the Kilo TT
    DIRT BOY

  12. #12
    King of the Hipsters
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Bend, Oregon
    My Bikes
    Bianchi Pista
    Posts
    2,125
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've ridden 23mm tires for the past five years, but have decided to go with 25mm tires on my new bike.

    First of all, I've noticed that not all manufacturers use the same measuring standards.

    For example, my 23mm Schwalbe Ultremo's look as large or larger than Continental's 25mm offerings.

    So, the 23mm tires from one manufacturer and the 25mm tires of another manufacturer might overlap or coincide in size, or even seem marked in reverse, with the larger tire marked smaller and the smaller tire marked larger.

    I have in the past ridden 23mm tires because of their low weight.

    I find that low rotating inertia makes for easier acceleration and braking (I don't skid).

    The newest offerings in 25mm come so close to the weight of 23mm tires in the past, that I see no penalty in riding a 25mm tire.

    As for advantages in riding a 25mm tire, I think the slightly lower tire pressure will mean a slightly lower percentage of flats.

    Given my very heavy body weight (220lb - 235lb), I think the 25mm tires will treat my bike frame a little more kindly, since my bike frame has to absorb both my weight and the road vibrations.

    And, finally, I've read several papers now that suggest that on the street, meaning, not on a smooth track but on an irregular surface, the 25mm tires with their slightly lower pressure actually have a lower rolling resistance when one takes surface irregularities into account.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Athens, Ohio
    My Bikes
    Fuji Track, Half built 70s Azuki
    Posts
    1,568
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by beeftech View Post
    I've ridden a ton of tires.
    If you have fairly smooth roads I'd say 25's.
    If you have flawless roads or don't mind riding on rocks go with 23's or less.
    Yeah, the roads in my town are about as far away from smooth as possible. The whole downtown area(which is relatively small but where i work/go to school) is all brick roads, many of which are in disrepair. I've been riding on 23s here for a long time and i think its time i actually got my head out of my ass and got some beefier tire.s

  14. #14
    chickenosaurus j3ffr3y's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Boston, MA
    My Bikes
    2010 Motobecane Team Track, 1997 GT Edge, 2012 Kilo TT Stripper
    Posts
    1,189
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Yellowbeard View Post
    They probably overinflate their 23s and then feel faster because the tires are bouncing off the ground so often.
    oh yeah! 120psi 23s and I weigh 130. Its awesome.
    2010 Motobecane Team Track
    1997 GT Edge
    2012 Kilo TT Stripper

  15. #15
    Senior Member jet sanchEz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    7,302
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I love 20s and have them on most of my bikes. They cut through the snow very well and are fast all year round. The best part is that very few people like them so they are always in-stock and often on sale!

  16. #16
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    3
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I ride a local trail on 25s. Originally, I had 23s and noticed the ride was a bit bumpier/I could feel things in the road. Not sure if this is a concern for you...

  17. #17
    Veteran Racer TejanoTrackie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Ciudad de Vacas, Tejas
    My Bikes
    28 frames + 73 wheels
    Posts
    7,218
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    OK, seriously, tire size depends a lot on rider weight. I weigh under 140 lbs, so I can run my 22c tubulars at just over 100 psi to get a nice smooth ride without a lot of rolling resistance or the risk of flats. Someone who weighs over 200 lbs definitely needs a wider section tire, at least a 25c and maybe even a 28c in back. Clinchers have the added problem of pinch flats, even when inflated to high pressures if a heavy rider runs narrow tires. I used to run 20c clinchers on the front of my road bike, and was constantly getting pinch flats.

  18. #18
    curmudgeon psirue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    647
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I prefer 25s over 23s over streets, even though I'm currently using 23s because the tires I'm using only come in that size.

  19. #19
    sau
    sau is offline
    Senior Member sau's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    83
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    always ride big in the back and small in the front. gives your bike a hot rod effect. haha.

    that is just my opinion. I skip a lot on my rear.

  20. #20
    Bicycle Repair Man !!! Sixty Fiver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    YEG
    My Bikes
    See my sig...
    Posts
    25,173
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Ride quality has a great deal to do with the quality of the tires and who makes them... I have been really surprised with the 700:23 Conti Ultrasport Kevlar as even at higher psi it rides better than the 700:25 Ultrasport.

    The 630:20 Avocets on my race bike run 125 psi, are stupidly fast... and have an incredibly nice ride.

  21. #21
    Ths Hipstr Kills Masheenz cc700's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    seattle
    My Bikes
    tirove
    Posts
    8,534
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    the quality of the tire makes so much more difference than the width it's not even worth thinking about. find a tire that fits that you like that also fits your budget, and if you want speed get a 23 and if you want comfort go as wide as you can in the tire that fits your needs.

  22. #22
    Loving Fixed Riding! DIRT BOY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    461
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by cc700 View Post
    the quality of the tire makes so much more difference than the width it's not even worth thinking about. find a tire that fits that you like that also fits your budget, and if you want speed get a 23 and if you want comfort go as wide as you can in the tire that fits your needs.
    Yes and NO!

    Did you read that link I posted? Narrower who add like a very, very small amount of speed due to aerodynamics as well. Tire compound will add/hinder speed/RR as well.

    I have some Schwalbe Super Moto 26 x 2.35 that are fast as hell for big tires. They roll as well as some 700x23c tires! Thats with 80/85psi

    DIRT BOY

  23. #23
    DRUNKDRIVER Zachee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    MKE, WI
    My Bikes
    Kilo TT custom
    Posts
    315
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Yellowbeard View Post
    They probably overinflate their 23s and then feel faster because the tires are bouncing off the ground so often.
    Pretty much.

    I ride 25's in a place where the roads are absolutely terrible. But 25's are where I'm most happy in terms of rolling resistance. Just have to avoid pot holes.

  24. #24
    asphalt demon Redline927's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    288
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    23's, the only way to go

  25. #25
    Old fart JohnDThompson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Appleton WI
    My Bikes
    Several, mostly not name brands.
    Posts
    11,857
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Sixty Fiver View Post
    Ride quality has a great deal to do with the quality of the tires and who makes them... I have been really surprised with the 700:23 Conti Ultrasport Kevlar as even at higher psi it rides better than the 700:25 Ultrasport.

    The 630:20 Avocets on my race bike run 125 psi, are stupidly fast... and have an incredibly nice ride.
    I like my Michelin 700 x 18C slicks:


Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •