Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
Reload this Page >

Critique my chainline

Search
Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

Critique my chainline

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-24-09, 05:37 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Andy_K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,744

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3230 Post(s)
Liked 3,868 Times in 1,439 Posts
Critique my chainline

I posted this picture (along with a few of the rest of the bike) on the "SS/FG Photos" thread. A comment by dddave said "the chainline on that gitane looks like sh*t."



Just looking at the photo, I can't entirely disagree, but I can't put my finger on what looks wrong. A while ago, when I first put this cog on, I got down under the workstand and put my eye to the crank and concluded that it looked very good. I'm now trying to convince myself that whatever is going on in this photo is just optical illusion, but I don't know if I buy that.

I asked dddave to elaborate on the other thread, but then I decided to solicit more opinions, not being sure how much traffic the photo thread gets.

So, what do you think? And don't just say it sucks...be specific please.
Andy_K is offline  
Old 08-24-09, 05:41 PM
  #2  
dsh
Oh, you know...
 
dsh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: DC
Posts: 2,834

Bikes: '74 Schwinn Sports Tourer (Polo), S-Works E5 Team Festina (Chorus 11), Trek 2200 Bonded Carbon (Fixed), Trek 920 (7 speed IGH), Chesini Olimpiade SL (1x7)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My chainline is the same way. Almost looks as though the cog and the chainwheel are at oblique angles instead of parallel.
dsh is offline  
Old 08-24-09, 05:59 PM
  #3  
AEO
Senior Member
 
AEO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: A Coffin Called Earth. or Toronto, ON
Posts: 12,257

Bikes: Bianchi, Miyata, Dahon, Rossin

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
looks like the crank spider or chainring is bent.
__________________
Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
https://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm
AEO is offline  
Old 08-24-09, 05:59 PM
  #4  
Dion Rides
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Ride it. If it doesn't fall off or make a bunch of noise - leave it!
 
Old 08-24-09, 06:20 PM
  #5  
old legs
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 910
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
never take pictures of mechanical parts close up with a wide angle lens.....try using a normal to mildly telephoto lens next time from further away.

That said the top of the chainring does look bent
Xgecko is offline  
Old 08-24-09, 06:44 PM
  #6  
extra bitter
 
kyselad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,584

Bikes: Miyata 210, Fuji Royale II, Bridgestone Kabuki, Miyata Ninety

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Just measure the chainline if you really want to know. Photos often suffer from perspective issues that make it impossible to know.

It's easy to check whether you chainring is bent -- it should be obvious by eye as it rotates, or you can pull it and lay it down flat.
kyselad is offline  
Old 08-24-09, 06:45 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Andy_K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,744

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3230 Post(s)
Liked 3,868 Times in 1,439 Posts
This picture was taken with a relatively normal lens -- the built-in on my Canon PowerShot S2 IS. I was just happy that it decided to focus on the chain and not the tire.

I'l take a closer look at the chainring. It is the stock ring from my cheapo Origin8 crankset. Somebody here said the rings on those were criminally unsafe or something like that. I hadn't really noticed, but it wouldn't surprise me too much if it's bent.
Andy_K is offline  
Old 08-24-09, 07:37 PM
  #8  
Comanche Racing
 
PedallingATX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
Posts: 2,820

Bikes: Presto NJS build, Specialized Allez Pro w/ full Dura Ace and Ksyrium SLs, 1990something Specialized Sirrus

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
it's fine, man. Just ride it. It's not as bad as others I've seen.

If your ring is on the inside of the spider, you could try putting it on the outside, it might help a bit. I really doubt your chainring is bent like the others say. more likely your chain is going inward at an angle and then once it hits the chainring it straightens back out, making it look bent.
PedallingATX is offline  
Old 08-24-09, 09:29 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Andy_K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,744

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3230 Post(s)
Liked 3,868 Times in 1,439 Posts
Originally Posted by PedallingATX
If your ring is on the inside of the spider, you could try putting it on the outside, it might help a bit. I really doubt your chainring is bent like the others say. more likely your chain is going inward at an angle and then once it hits the chainring it straightens back out, making it look bent.
Now that part is definitely an illusion. The hub here is a Formula flip-flop with a 42mm chainline (measured), and my chainring is on the outside. Within the margin of error of my measurement, it's just about perfect. Of course, the measurements assume the frame is straight. But I think it is. I've checked that.

In the picture, it definitely looks like the chain turns outward at the front of the chainring and inward at the bottom of the cog. I looked closer this evening, and neither of these things seems to actually be the case. The chainring doesn't seem to be bent either.

I guess it's just my photography that's sh*t.

So maybe my question should have been, how do you take a good chainline picture?
Andy_K is offline  
Old 08-24-09, 09:34 PM
  #10  
*
 
adriano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 6,876

Bikes: https://velospace.org/node/18951

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
its satisfactory.
__________________

α
adriano is offline  
Old 08-25-09, 05:29 AM
  #11  
Spawn of Satan
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA
Posts: 765
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
A good way to see if your cog and ring are aligned is to use a straight edge.

I like to use a three foot level. With the chain off the cog and chain ring, lay the straight edge on the face of chainring. I rest it between two legs of the spider. It must be flush against the face. Then rotate the crank/level down until you get close to the cog.

This will not tell you your chainline but it will tell you how close your cog and chainring are. Which is what you really want.
captsven is offline  
Old 08-25-09, 05:48 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 36
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Andy_K
This picture was taken with a relatively normal lens -- the built-in on my Canon PowerShot S2 IS. I was just happy that it decided to focus on the chain and not the tire.

I'l take a closer look at the chainring. It is the stock ring from my cheapo Origin8 crankset. Somebody here said the rings on those were criminally unsafe or something like that. I hadn't really noticed, but it wouldn't surprise me too much if it's bent.
The lenses in compact cameras are notorious for distortions in this kind of photo--you won't notice it in a lot of snapshots, but take a picture of anything straight, or get too close while you're zoomed wide, and you'll almost always see it.

If you'd taken this photo with a Canon L-series lens, it might be a different story, but I'm betting the problem here is your lens and the perspective, not your chainline.
Dr. DRE is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.