Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Sugino RD2 chainline

    so here's a new one for ya'll... and yes that is sarcasm you detect...
    i recently bought a track frame with a sugino RD2 touring crank (has bolts on the inside for the granny gear) attached to what i believe to be a sugino 103 BB. this combination is reported to give one a 45mm chainline when the chain ring is on the outside of the spider (as it currently is).
    i'm running this with a formula track hub, dura ace cog + lock ring which i assume to give me a chain line of ~42mm.
    3mm difference is not something i'm really into, and while the chain line is pretty quiet, it's not that morbid silence i demand.
    so for starters, i tried moving the chain ring (48t, 1/8") to the inside of the spider, but no such luck: the chain ring rubs against the chain stays.
    Ideally, i'd like a perfectly straight chain line, but i'm willing to settle for 1-2mm difference between the ring and the cog.
    options for achieving this include a 107mm BB with the chainring on the inside of the spider, redishing the wheel to change the chainline (would really rather avoid this), spacing the rear sprocket (is that a terrible idea?), or perhaps just a smaller chainring (44t? 42t? will this provide enough chain stay clearance?)
    I'm willing to shell out some $$ to make this happen (perhaps for a new BB) but i'd like to keep the process relatively inexpensive.
    So! What do ya'll think is the best option?
    anything i've overlooked that could solve this easily?
    thoughts? opinions? **** talking cause it's moronic for the RD2 to have a 45mm chain line?
    thanks for your help!

  2. #2
    Bastard of Reality Scrodzilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    24,215
    Mentioned
    24 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    RD = road double. It's not supposed to have a 42mm chainline.

    I started a similar thread asking similar questions that is still active.

  3. #3
    Wheelnut phyko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Washington DC
    My Bikes
    Salsa Casseroll
    Posts
    53
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Has anyone really been far as decided to use even go want to do look more like?

  4. #4
    Bastard of Reality Scrodzilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    24,215
    Mentioned
    24 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Ha!

  5. #5
    Gentlemen. ADSR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Chico, CA
    My Bikes
    S-Works e5 Aerotech with 2009 Veloce and a Fulcrum 5s
    Posts
    1,517
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by phyko View Post
    Has anyone really been far as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
    You've got to be kidding me. I've been further even more decided to use even go need to do look more as anyone can. Can you really be far even as decided half as much to use go wish for that? My guess is that when one really been far even as decided once to use even go want, it is then that he has really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like. It's just common sense.
    The bums will always lose.

  6. #6
    Wheelnut phyko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Washington DC
    My Bikes
    Salsa Casseroll
    Posts
    53
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Don't listen to that troll, Scrodzilla. He was just trying to make fun of your post. Your post was a legitimate question.

  7. #7
    Bastard of Reality Scrodzilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    24,215
    Mentioned
    24 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    That seems like a lot of effort just to make fun of my post. Some people must really not have better things to do. I guess I fell for it, huh?

    ADSR - blowing my mind.

  8. #8
    Dances With Cars TRaffic Jammer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    My Bikes
    TBL Onyx Pro(ss converted), Pake SS (starting to look kinda pimped)
    Posts
    10,527
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    damn my head hurts

  9. #9
    Senior Member filtersweep's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    2,615
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    nice first post... and yes that is sarcasm you detect...

  10. #10
    Senior Member chi-james's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    My Bikes
    team miyata, '73 p-14, MB-3, centurion lemans, Mystery TT, mongoose atb '85
    Posts
    342
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by jamiethegiraffe View Post
    so here's a new one for ya'll... and yes that is sarcasm you detect...
    i recently bought a track frame with a sugino RD2 touring crank (has bolts on the inside for the granny gear) attached to what i believe to be a sugino 103 BB. this combination is reported to give one a 45mm chainline when the chain ring is on the outside of the spider (as it currently is).
    i'm running this with a formula track hub, dura ace cog + lock ring which i assume to give me a chain line of ~42mm.
    3mm difference is not something i'm really into, and while the chain line is pretty quiet, it's not that morbid silence i demand.
    so for starters, i tried moving the chain ring (48t, 1/8") to the inside of the spider, but no such luck: the chain ring rubs against the chain stays.
    Ideally, i'd like a perfectly straight chain line, but i'm willing to settle for 1-2mm difference between the ring and the cog.
    options for achieving this include a 107mm BB with the chainring on the inside of the spider, redishing the wheel to change the chainline (would really rather avoid this), spacing the rear sprocket (is that a terrible idea?), or perhaps just a smaller chainring (44t? 42t? will this provide enough chain stay clearance?)
    I'm willing to shell out some $$ to make this happen (perhaps for a new BB) but i'd like to keep the process relatively inexpensive.
    So! What do ya'll think is the best option?
    anything i've overlooked that could solve this easily?
    thoughts? opinions? **** talking cause it's moronic for the RD2 to have a 45mm chain line?
    thanks for your help!

    how many teeth on your cog? maybe switching down to a 42t chainring will give you enough clearance?

  11. #11
    Senior Member chi-james's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    My Bikes
    team miyata, '73 p-14, MB-3, centurion lemans, Mystery TT, mongoose atb '85
    Posts
    342
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Scrodzilla View Post
    RD = road double. It's not supposed to have a 42mm chainline.

    I started a similar thread asking similar questions that is still active.
    hmm, 103BB + RD should yield 42mm chainline, atleast according to harriscyclery...

    oh, it's an RD2...
    Last edited by chi-james; 12-09-09 at 02:44 PM. Reason: reread op

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •