Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 86
  1. #1
    Team Water Andy_K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Beaverton, OR
    My Bikes
    2013 Kona Jake, 2008 Kona Major Jake, 2013 Kona Jake the Snake, 1999 Kona Muni Mula, 2012 Ridley Excalibur, 2008 Surly Long Haul Trucker
    Posts
    7,022
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Do you really like fixed gear bikes?

    I was just reading the "Should I Buy This Frame?" thread, which is just the latest of many threads I've seen here where there was a large contingent of people expressing the sentiment that really nice frames should be built up with gears. This puzzles me.

    Allow me to opine....

    It seems to me that there are several possible reasons that a person would want a fixed gear bike:

    1. You want a bike for track racing
    2. You want a cheap bike
    3. You want a simple bike
    4. You want a low maintenance bike
    5. You want to do tricks
    6. You think fixed gear bikes are fun to ride
    7. You think it will make a good project to learn basic mechanical skills
    8. You want to improve your pedaling form
    9. You want to work on your spinning and/or mashing abilities
    10. You've heard that a lot of people like them and want to try it to see what the appeal is

    I'm sure there are other reasons, but those were the ones I could think of off the top of my head.

    Now assuming you more or less accept this list, it seems to me that if a person wants a fixed gear bike because of some combination of 3, 4, 6, 8 and 9 (and arguably even 7), there is no reason that any frame with horizontal dropouts should be deemed as "too nice" to build up as a fixed gear bike.

    In my mind, the only difference between a bike "designed to be a fixed gear bike" and a bike that was designed to be a road bike but has horizontal dropouts is geometry, and in many of the cases I listed above road geometry is desirable.

    So what's the deal?

  2. #2
    Live without dead time
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    2,137
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Don't get me wrong here, I don't care what you do with your frame (although I always recommend against hacking off cable stops because after a few months when you're not a moron, you might regret having made your bike less functional) but it's worth keeping in mind that a geared road bike is always going to be faster, climb better, descend better, sprint better and generally be better given two identical frames, one set up fixed, one set up geared. So if you have a truly beautiful bike that is going to handle buttery smooth and feel all lively and such, you'll get more out of it by making it into a geared bike.

    Now again, I don't care either way, but to me the logic makes sense if you really want to get into it. Fixed gears are less good from a purely performance perspective.
    Rich

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    6
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    minimalism

  4. #4
    Team Water Andy_K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Beaverton, OR
    My Bikes
    2013 Kona Jake, 2008 Kona Major Jake, 2013 Kona Jake the Snake, 1999 Kona Muni Mula, 2012 Ridley Excalibur, 2008 Surly Long Haul Trucker
    Posts
    7,022
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by elTwitcho View Post
    Don't get me wrong here, I don't care what you do with your frame (although I always recommend against hacking off cable stops because after a few months when you're not a moron, you might regret having made your bike less functional) but it's worth keeping in mind that a geared road bike is always going to be faster, climb better, descend better, sprint better and generally be better given two identical frames, one set up fixed, one set up geared. So if you have a truly beautiful bike that is going to handle buttery smooth and feel all lively and such, you'll get more out of it by making it into a geared bike.
    Sure, but it seems awfully presumptuous to assume that an early 80's Colnago, for instance, is going to be the nicest road bike a given person owns. Say, for instance, I've got a 2010 Trek Madone, and I want to build up a fixed gear bike for training purpose. Will I be better off building up a Surly Steamroller or the 80's Colnago?

    I definitely agree about not hacking things off, though.

  5. #5
    Banned.
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    20
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    as long as people are riding bikes...ya know

  6. #6
    Metal Maniac
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Chicago
    My Bikes
    1973 Fuji Finest fully restored, touring setup. Bianchi Classica with silver lilac powdercoat, fixed gear commuter bike.
    Posts
    45
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by elTwitcho View Post
    Don't get me wrong here, I don't care what you do with your frame (although I always recommend against hacking off cable stops because after a few months when you're not a moron, you might regret having made your bike less functional) but it's worth keeping in mind that a geared road bike is always going to be faster, climb better, descend better, sprint better and generally be better given two identical frames, one set up fixed, one set up geared. So if you have a truly beautiful bike that is going to handle buttery smooth and feel all lively and such, you'll get more out of it by making it into a geared bike.

    Now again, I don't care either way, but to me the logic makes sense if you really want to get into it. Fixed gears are less good from a purely performance perspective.
    Homie's right. As somebody with a pretty good conversion and a couple nice geared road bikes, I have to say that if a frame is really nice, I'd like to see it achieve its full potential by being fast as possible with gears. I mean, if somebody's posting about a frame they're thinking about buying in the fixed forum, it doesn't make much sense to say "GET GEARS!" since they're probably thinking fixed anyway, but it's what I'd be thinking. The thing is, a nice frame is good to ride for many miles at a time, and gears make that a lot easier. If you're buying a nice frame to ride in the city (theft-bait, IMO), then fixed makes sense, I guess. I love riding fixed because it's fun, but it's also nice because a fixie makes a great beater/utility bike. I'd hate to see an old De Rosa, Colnago, or Pinarello turned into a beater. Might as well gear it up and do centuries on it, right?

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    7,118
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Andy_K View Post
    I was just reading the "Should I Buy This Frame?" thread, which is just the latest of many threads I've seen here where there was a large contingent of people expressing the sentiment that really nice frames should be built up with gears. This puzzles me.

    Allow me to opine....

    It seems to me that there are several possible reasons that a person would want a fixed gear bike:

    1. You want a bike for track racing
    2. You want a cheap bike
    3. You want a simple bike
    4. You want a low maintenance bike
    5. You want to do tricks
    6. You think fixed gear bikes are fun to ride
    7. You think it will make a good project to learn basic mechanical skills
    8. You want to improve your pedaling form
    9. You want to work on your spinning and/or mashing abilities
    10. You've heard that a lot of people like them and want to try it to see what the appeal is

    I'm sure there are other reasons, but those were the ones I could think of off the top of my head.

    Now assuming you more or less accept this list, it seems to me that if a person wants a fixed gear bike because of some combination of 3, 4, 6, 8 and 9 (and arguably even 7), there is no reason that any frame with horizontal dropouts should be deemed as "too nice" to build up as a fixed gear bike.

    In my mind, the only difference between a bike "designed to be a fixed gear bike" and a bike that was designed to be a road bike but has horizontal dropouts is geometry, and in many of the cases I listed above road geometry is desirable.

    So what's the deal?
    this is funny. i read through your list twice (before reading anything else you typed), selected 4, 6,8, and 9 as the numbers that fit me. then read on further an realized YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT ME!!

    i ride a aluminum road bike with vertical dropputs.

  8. #8
    Pants are for suckaz HandsomeRyan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Mt. Airy, MD
    My Bikes
    Hardtail MTB, Fixed gear, and Commuter bike
    Posts
    2,579
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    11. Sheldon Brown.

    ^my reason.

  9. #9
    Team Water Andy_K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Beaverton, OR
    My Bikes
    2013 Kona Jake, 2008 Kona Major Jake, 2013 Kona Jake the Snake, 1999 Kona Muni Mula, 2012 Ridley Excalibur, 2008 Surly Long Haul Trucker
    Posts
    7,022
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by thirdgenbird View Post
    this is funny. i read through your list twice (before reading anything else you typed), selected 4, 6,8, and 9 as the numbers that fit me. then read on further an realized YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT ME!!
    That is funny.

    So, I guess what I'm saying is, maybe the Colnago (for instance) would be better in some abstract sense as a geared bike, but for $400, you're probably not going to find a better frame for fixed gear road riding. If you had posted an old mid-level Schwinn, there would have been a whole bunch of people (hopefully different people) telling you that it wasn't worth converting.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    7,118
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Andy_K View Post
    That is funny.

    So, I guess what I'm saying is, maybe the Colnago (for instance) would be better in some abstract sense as a geared bike, but for $400, you're probably not going to find a better frame for fixed gear road riding. If you had posted an old mid-level Schwinn, there would have been a whole bunch of people (hopefully different people) telling you that it wasn't worth converting.
    i not the one buying the colnogo, i just fit in the same category.


    i hope he gets that thing and builds it up as a ssfg with campy components.

  11. #11
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Sacramento, CA
    Posts
    116
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I don't, I just wanted to be cool.

  12. #12
    Blaster of Reality Scrodzilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    24,625
    Mentioned
    27 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    I do genuinely like fixed gear bikes. I also really like cats.

  13. #13
    Elitest Murray Owner Mos6502's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    My Bikes
    1972 Columbia Tourist Expert III, Columbia Roadster
    Posts
    2,562
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Andy_K View Post
    ...which is just the latest of many threads I've seen here where there was a large contingent of people expressing the sentiment that really nice frames should be built up with gears. This puzzles me.
    There are really nice frames that were meant to be used with derailleurs. I think it is the use of those really nice frames that people are talking about.

    There are also really nice frames that were made with no consideration for the use of derailleurs, and it would be stupid to put derailleurs on them.

    It's really not that puzzling.

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    7,118
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Mos6502 View Post
    There are really nice frames that were meant to be used with derailleurs. I think it is the use of those really nice frames that people are talking about.

    There are also really nice frames that were made with no consideration for the use of derailleurs, and it would be stupid to put derailleurs on them.

    It's really not that puzzling.
    fixed gear frames dont always have "road bike geometry" witch can be nice for road riding...

    i also find a lot of fixed gear frames overpriced. you can get 7000 series aluminum and Reynolds 853 road bike frames much cheaper than a fixed gear versions.

  15. #15
    Senior Member chi-james's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    My Bikes
    team miyata, '73 p-14, MB-3, centurion lemans, Mystery TT, mongoose atb '85
    Posts
    343
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The OP is confusing, what is he trying to understand? Is this a search for a combination of reasons that equates "really like"?

    allow me to add one more "reason" to the list:

    0. because you want a fixed gear bicycle

    this makes my "reason" for riding a fixed gear bicycle more "complete":

    8-6-7-5-3-0-9-ee-ah-yee

  16. #16
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    21
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    most horizontal frames also come with braze-ons, etc for brakes, cables, whathaveyou. i don't like these things, and track-type frames made for the 'fixie crowd' don't have these things and tend to try to be as simple as possible.

    clearly, with the last couple of threads, like the fgss people being mean, and this one too, that clearly this crowd is a little different than the others. we like design, we like hands-on, and we like our bikes.

    i, personally, don't care as much about road bike vs. track bike, but i do like a comfortable bike that has the things i need, and leaves out the things i don't want. that's why i ride fgss, in addition to some of your points.

  17. #17
    FNG destikon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Quarry Stone
    My Bikes
    Raleigh Special * Nishiki MTN Winter Commuter * Trek Soho 3 * Specialized Langster Seattle
    Posts
    877
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    12. To be cool
    Quote Originally Posted by powers2b View Post
    time's up

  18. #18
    K2ProFlex baby! ilikebikes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    My response would have been something along the lines of: "Does your bike have computer controlled suspension? Then shut your piehole, this baby is from the future!"
    My Bikes
    to many to list
    Posts
    6,093
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I can't stand riding fixed gear bikes, but thats just for me, it doesn't bother me that others do like them as thats what cycling is all about, finding the type of bike you like and riding it. =0)
    Last edited by ilikebikes; 12-10-09 at 09:28 PM.
    You see, their morals, their code...it's a bad joke, dropped at the first sign of trouble. They're only as good as the world allows them to be. I'll show you. When the chips are down, these...These "civilized" people...they'll eat each other. See, I'm not a monster. I'm just ahead of the curve

  19. #19
    Fresh Garbage hairnet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    11,085
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    They are fun and low maintenance, great for a commuter bike. I would like to have a nice steel road frame, but I would not remove the cable guides
    Last edited by hairnet; 12-10-09 at 10:56 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Scrodzilla View Post
    I'd rather ride a greasy bowling ball than one of those things.
    Bikerowave
    My Bikes

  20. #20
    AEO
    AEO is offline
    Senior Member AEO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    A Coffin Called Earth. or Toronto, ON
    My Bikes
    Bianchi, Miyata, Dahon, Rossin
    Posts
    12,255
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    low... maintenance...?

    proper chain slack is high maintenance compared to dealing with stretched cables.

    It's just highly unattractive to steal compared to a geared bike.
    no expensive shifters or derailers to steal, all the expensive stuff (frame and wheels) are locked together.
    even if you do break through the lock, if you're not used to riding FG, especially ones equipped with clipless pedals and no brakes, you're in for one hell of a ride.
    Last edited by AEO; 12-10-09 at 11:03 PM.
    Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
    http://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm

  21. #21
    Real Men Ride Ordinaries fuzz2050's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    3,648
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Why the hell should I care if my bike climbs better, or goes faster or any of that? All I know is that (sometimes) a fixed gear is more fun to ride. In fact, I think it's more fun to ride precisely because it climbs poorly, goes slower and requires a lot more out of you.

    I live somewhere pretty darn flat, with no real variety in terrain for miles and miles. Cycling gets dull. Whenever I go elsewhere, get to ride up a few hills, maybe tackle a real trail or two, my passion gets renewed. Then, returning to my pancake of a home, I turn to fixed gears to make things a little more interesting. Yeah, it's not really a climb, but it's more fun going up those freeway overpasses on a fixed gear than on a geared bike. The path by my house isn't much to a mountain bike, but ride it on a fixed cross bike, and it's a challenge, and it's exciting.

    So what if I'm slow, can't climb and all the other faults. I'm having more fun. I don't know about you, but that's why I bike.

  22. #22
    Comanche Racing PedallingATX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Deep in the heart of Texas
    My Bikes
    Presto NJS build, Specialized Allez Pro w/ full Dura Ace and Ksyrium SLs, 1990something Specialized Sirrus
    Posts
    2,822
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    my FG bike isn't much slower than my geared bike. Even going up hills. The only time it is noticeably slower is when i go down hills.

    Also, what is the point of this thread? Of course i like riding FG.
    skinnytire

  23. #23
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Sacramento, CA
    Posts
    116
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by destikon View Post
    12. To be cool
    ^^

  24. #24
    Wheelnut phyko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Washington DC
    My Bikes
    Salsa Casseroll
    Posts
    53
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I dont think there is such a thing as a bike being too nice to be a singlespeed. There are a lot of handmade track bicycles or keirin frames that are really expensive and nice and are meant to be singlespeeds.

  25. #25
    Senior Member ZiP0082's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    My Bikes
    2008 Mercier Kilo TT
    Posts
    1,703
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    13. for the girls!

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •