Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 34
  1. #1
    Senior Member rootbeer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    South Flori-duh!
    Posts
    180
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    46 chainring, thinking about trying 48 t chainring. Any thoughts?

    I was curious, I'm currently 46/17 and was thinking of trying 48/17. Worth trying, or waste of money and just stay 46/17

  2. #2
    Senior Member peazweag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    albany,oregon
    My Bikes
    1973 RALEIGH SUPER COURSE,85 FUI ALLEGRO
    Posts
    350
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    it depends what your looking to get out of it.is the 46 too easy you will have a bit more speed with a 48.I run a 48x16 set up ,I jumped up from a 44x16..thats a 4 tooth jump.46x16 might be an option too.

  3. #3
    Senior Member rootbeer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    South Flori-duh!
    Posts
    180
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I don't know, it just seems like 46/17 is nice, but it feels imo like I'm doing a lot of work and not going very fast :/ I live in flat areas with the only hills being a bridge here and there...I might try 46/16

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    332
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I went from 42-16 to 48-17 and I have hills, you should be okay.

  5. #5
    Veteran Bastard Scrodzilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    My Bikes
    EAI Bare Knuckle / Leader 725 / 1975 Raleigh Professional Track
    Posts
    23,887
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    48/17 is my favorite gear ratio. I find it to be very well-rounded for the mild hills (also mostly bridges) where I live.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    220
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Enjoy the negligible difference.

  7. #7
    Veteran Bastard Scrodzilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    My Bikes
    EAI Bare Knuckle / Leader 725 / 1975 Raleigh Professional Track
    Posts
    23,887
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    The difference won't be huge but adding 3 gear inches should be noticeable.

    OP - you'd get more out of keeping 46t up front and changing your cog to 16t.

  8. #8
    My name is Alex Lilcphoto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    PDX
    My Bikes
    Mercier Kilo TT Stripper in RAW, Schwinn Madison 2008 Blue, Leader 725tr, Brassknuckle, Leader 722, Traitor Ruben
    Posts
    1,701
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    In Portland here I went with 46-16 from the stock kilo 48-16 and it definitely helps with all of the stop n' go's that I encounter... That being said, I say try and find a cheap 48t chain ring (or a bike with that gearing) and try it out...

  9. #9
    Senior Member rootbeer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    South Flori-duh!
    Posts
    180
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Well, I wanted to try 48/17 because the sram omnionomnomnom's come with a 48 chainring. Granted I can change the chainring to another brand, 46 but - think ill give 48 a try.

  10. #10
    Senior Member bhop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles
    My Bikes
    Bianchi Via Nirone 7, Jamis Sputnik
    Posts
    1,889
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I ride 46-16 with a few hills. If it were flat, i'd definitely bump it up some.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Sacramento
    Posts
    1,015
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I ride a 700x23c wheel, 170mm crank, and a 48*16 gear (single speed only)

    I normally cruise at 19-22mph, max out at about 32-34 before I spin out.

    I live in a relatively flat area with some rolling hills if I choose to ride them. I really like the gear, but occasionally swap to a 50*16. The two tooth jump for me (in my case from 48-50) is significant enough that from a standing start I can feel the higher strain. I can curise a little less easy since the extra few teeth in front at my normal cadence run at around 20mph on the low end.... which makes me "try" a bit too hard for my liking.

    My opinion is that the two teeth in front will mean, given the same cadence I ride about .5 mph faster, but have to try a bit harder, and increases my max speed enough to be noticable. It also makes stop-light starts a little more work, and I can actually feel the difference in time it takes me to get up to speed.

    Hope this information helps.

  12. #12
    Old fart JohnDThompson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Appleton WI
    My Bikes
    Several, mostly not name brands.
    Posts
    12,353
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    What's wrong with the 46? Going from 46 to 48 isn't much of a change. Get a 47 and then you'll always have maximum skid patches regardless of what cog you use.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,299
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    cogs are cheap. keep the 46 ring and do a 16t cog. i really like 46x16/17 (in/out of form, in my local rolling hills) as a gear choice.
    Last edited by dookie; 10-19-10 at 08:09 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by politely removed
    I am ****ing devoted too. I am moving into my friend's closet just so I can save up for bike stuff.
    well, here's some for you! everything's for sale...

  14. #14
    Constant tinkerer FastJake's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Madison, Wisconsin
    Posts
    6,120
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    One other thing to think about is chain length. When you change gearing your wheel will move in the dropouts. But two teeth is a pretty minor change and shouldn't force you to change your chain length, unless you're already at one extreme.

    Quote Originally Posted by dookie View Post
    cogs are cheap. keep the 46 ring and do a 16t cog.
    This.

  15. #15
    Painfully average. calv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Oakland/Davis, CA
    My Bikes
    all city mr pink
    Posts
    2,536
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    How do you guys ride with those ratios, I'm guessing my ratio 48/16 isn't much different from 46/16 and its tough as hell haha. Maybe I just have weak legs.
    Quote Originally Posted by ThisJauntyGent View Post
    The stories about the smell are absolutely true: straight elephant dick.
    All City Mr Pink

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Sacramento
    Posts
    1,015
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by calv View Post
    How do you guys ride with those ratios, I'm guessing my ratio 48/16 isn't much different from 46/16 and its tough as hell haha. Maybe I just have weak legs.
    Depends on the bike, how far you plan on going, your condition, the terrain.

    Some guys here actually ride on the track.

    My SS is ~17lbs and I only do 20mile training rides.

    48x16 in tennis shoes and baggy jeans on a 25lb bike is very different than the same gear on a 17lb bike, in an uber-dork spandex kit (what I ride in), with carbon soled shoes and clipless pedals. It may not be you,... it may just be your intent.

  17. #17
    . xavier853's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Columbus
    My Bikes
    Pegueot UO8, Tommaso Augusta
    Posts
    2,027
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    hell go to 49t

  18. #18
    We haven't located us yet nealjoslyn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Idaho
    My Bikes
    Hong Fu, Mercier Kilo tt, Cannondale 2.8, Takara Grand Touring
    Posts
    168
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I went from 46x16 to 46x17 and noticed a huge difference. There are a lot of hills (big ones) around here so 46x17 is better, but sometimes I feel like I'm spinning pretty fast, especially downhill. If you don't have any serious hills to deal with, 48x17 might even be lower than what you want (depending on how you ride). I'd probably just go with 46x16 or higher. Oh and cogs tend to be cheaper than chainrings (in my experience).
    Last edited by nealjoslyn; 10-19-10 at 05:29 PM. Reason: (in my experience)

  19. #19
    Senior Member rootbeer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    South Flori-duh!
    Posts
    180
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    See this is what sucks, the SRAM Ormoiaoaonomnomnom's only come 48 chainring crankset. I have a feeling I might like 48/17...

    The sugino messenger I heard is a kind of a waste and I might as well buy the Sram Ormonomnomnoms... I just really want a new crankset. Why? Heck, why do people buy Aerospokes, or Chris King Headsets, or Brooks B17's. I just want to buy some nice parts for my bike

  20. #20
    Veteran Bastard Scrodzilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    My Bikes
    EAI Bare Knuckle / Leader 725 / 1975 Raleigh Professional Track
    Posts
    23,887
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    I happen to like the SRAM S300 better than Ominominominominominoms. Less money too.


    http://www.universalcycles.com/shopp...s.php?id=26702

  21. #21
    a bored kid hpmcardle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    East Lansing, MI
    My Bikes
    Year unknown CCM Targa conversion
    Posts
    177
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It totally depends on terrain. I ride 48-15 because my town is flat as a pancake. Why don't y'all like Sugino cranks?
    Quote Originally Posted by cc700 View Post
    i'm so icy hot i need to put bleach on my skids to keep my underwear as fresh as my street cred.

  22. #22
    Senior Member rootbeer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    South Flori-duh!
    Posts
    180
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Scrodzilla View Post
    I happen to like the SRAM S300 better than Ominominominominominoms. Less money too.


    http://www.universalcycles.com/shopp...s.php?id=26702

    Bro..bro...bro...those are nice, but I want 1/8. I need dem + tarck points son!

  23. #23
    Rawr
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    186
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by rootbeer View Post
    Bro..bro...bro...those are nice, but I want 1/8. I need dem + tarck points son!
    bro, labeled by universal cycles with "courier". That gives you mad street cred.

  24. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Menlo Park, CA
    My Bikes
    GT Forte Ti, Specialized Tricross Sport, Specialized Langster, Bianchi Fremont, Xootr Swift
    Posts
    2,168
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i have the s300 on the kilo (46/16) and the omniums on the gtb (48/17). i will have to say that 1) the omniums are stiffer than the s300 (1/8" vs 3/32"; 144bcd vs 130bcd), and 2) 46/16 and 48/17 are really close in terms of gear inches, and both are good all-around gear ratios for street use/commuting. it allows you to tackle the occasional hill, and still push 20+mph on flats. 46/17 is a good gear for street use/commuting as well, but you're more likely get dropped on a group ride (whereas with the 46/16 or 48/17, you at least have a shot at hugging the wheel in front of you).
    i won't deny it i'm a straight ridah

  25. #25
    Senior Member rootbeer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    South Flori-duh!
    Posts
    180
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by tFUnK View Post
    i have the s300 on the kilo (46/16) and the omniums on the gtb (48/17). i will have to say that 1) the omniums are stiffer than the s300 (1/8" vs 3/32"; 144bcd vs 130bcd), and 2) 46/16 and 48/17 are really close in terms of gear inches, and both are good all-around gear ratios for street use/commuting. it allows you to tackle the occasional hill, and still push 20+mph on flats. 46/17 is a good gear for street use/commuting as well, but you're more likely get dropped on a group ride (whereas with the 46/16 or 48/17, you at least have a shot at hugging the wheel in front of you).


    Hrmm thanks. That's pretty helpful!

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •