Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 28
  1. #1
    pjb
    pjb is offline
    don't even pjb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Chicago
    My Bikes
    Peugot Conversion, Jamis w.i.p.
    Posts
    123
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    What Crank Length Do You Prefer?

    Mostly out of curiosity, I'm wondering what crank length everyone here likes to use. Those of you with multiple bikes (which I think is most of us), do you have same length crank arms on both bikes? Different lengths for different purposes, riding styles, track vs road, etc. etc?

    I've got 170mm's on both of my two bikes, and when I bought the cranks for the second bike I went with 170s mostly because it was what I was used to and didn't really want to risk switching up to something I didn't like.

    Annnyyyways, without much experience beyond my 170s and my friend's 175s I feel like there may be a whole world of crank lengths that I might like more that I've never had the chance to try.

    I did do a little internet scooping and I found a formula of L(mm) = inseam(inches)*5.48
    With that I got 172.62mm and a little more curious because if anything I feel like I might like something less than 170s, not more than...

    Wrapping this up now, feel like I'm rambling a bit. Do you personally notice a large difference between a small change in crank length? i.e. 5-10mm? And what is your preferred length?

    Thanks,
    -pete

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    im, hungary
    Posts
    1,984
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i went from 165's to 170s, liked the change, feels a bit more natural to me.

  3. #3
    Ths Hipstr Kills Masheenz cc700's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    seattle
    My Bikes
    tirove
    Posts
    8,544
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

  4. #4
    GONE~
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    6,745
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm 5'11"ish and I use 170mm.

    I had 165 before and didn't quite like it, I want to try 167.5 in the future.

  5. #5
    pjb
    pjb is offline
    don't even pjb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Chicago
    My Bikes
    Peugot Conversion, Jamis w.i.p.
    Posts
    123
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Vixtor View Post
    I'm 5'11"ish and I use 170mm.

    I had 165 before and didn't quite like it, I want to try 167.5 in the future.
    I'm about 5'10" so that helps a lot actually. How much would one really feel in such a small change? (not harshing on you, legitimately curious)

  6. #6
    Ths Hipstr Kills Masheenz cc700's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    seattle
    My Bikes
    tirove
    Posts
    8,544
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    depends on how much i'm cornering on the bike. low speed commuter townie with low gears? 175s are fine. bombing hills brakeless and otherwise acting a damn fool on and off the velodrome? i'd prefer to stick to 165's for that. that's why i have two cranksets.

  7. #7
    Oscillation overthruster Dr. Banzai's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Duncan, BC
    My Bikes
    Cinelli Mash / CAAD9 5
    Posts
    1,532
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    165 on 700c. Tarmac and plywood.

    I ran 170 on BMX for years. I like the shorter crank. I have short, powerful legs. Like a big bore turbo 4 cylinder. 165mm makes me a square engine. If you don't know what a square engine is look it up. Rod length and femur length are quite similar to me.

    Yes, I know I just mentioned rod length. I'm talking serious maths though people.

  8. #8
    Oscillation overthruster Dr. Banzai's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Duncan, BC
    My Bikes
    Cinelli Mash / CAAD9 5
    Posts
    1,532
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Vixtor View Post
    I'm 5'11"ish and I use 170mm.
    Growth hormones or steroids?

  9. #9
    dsh
    dsh is offline
    Oh, you know... dsh's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    DC
    My Bikes
    '74 Schwinn Sports Tourer (Polo), S-Works E5 Team Festina (Chorus 11), Trek 2200 Bonded Carbon (Fixed), Trek 920 (7 speed IGH), Chesini Olimpiade SL (1x7)
    Posts
    2,838
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i've got 165s, 167.5s, 170s, and 172.5s.

  10. #10
    GONE~
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    6,745
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I blame the milk.

    When I had 165mm, my knees would always tingle when I even just cruise at the normal speed. It might be a fit thing but I don't think it was, might go back to 165mm to see if I like it.

  11. #11
    Member Great Pan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Oakland, CA
    My Bikes
    1978 Schwinn Le Tour III
    Posts
    29
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I use 167.5mm

    I've been considering going smaller, but that probably wont be until my next build, and who knows when that will be.

  12. #12
    Elitist carleton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    11,150
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    For the track bike, I switched from 170s to 167.5. I'm happy.

    175s on the road bike.

  13. #13
    THE STUFFED Leukybear's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Sandy Eggo, CA
    My Bikes
    Sworks Venge; Kona Paddywagon; Ibis Mojo SL-R
    Posts
    10,395
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    165mm - 170mm; no more, no less.

  14. #14
    Senior Member mihlbach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    6,364
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by carleton View Post
    For the track bike, I switched from 170s to 167.5. I'm happy.

    175s on the road bike.
    Exactly...it depends on the application.

    167.5 on the track bike. 170 on my street fixies. 172.5 on the road. 175 SS-offroad. 180 on the BMX racer, although this feels a bit long ...thinking of going a bit shorter here..feels like its causing me to spin out too soon.

  15. #15
    Senior Member Deshi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Scottsdale, AZ
    My Bikes
    2009 Pake in Deep Purple, 1986 Pinarello Pista 195? Raleigh 3sp, 2003 Intense M1, 2003 Giant Yukon SS, 2010 Premium Deathtrap
    Posts
    1,587
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    170 on the pinarello, 165 on the pake, 175 on the schwinn, 175 on the soul, 175 on the no name. Im 5'11" with a 33" inseam. I prefer the 170's over all.
    Quote Originally Posted by PedallingATX View Post
    dude...you can't "no ****" something THAT ****. That's like saying "sometimes I just like to make out with dudes...no ****"

  16. #16
    Noob. longjohns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    NYC/NJ
    Posts
    504
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i had 163 cranks and loved them. now im riding on 165's

  17. #17
    Banned.
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    116
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    im 5"10 and i have 170's on my bike. on tight corners it will hit the ground sometimes. but i've ridden my friends 165's and i liked it a lot better cause i didnt have to worry much about corners anymore...planning on gettin 165's soon

  18. #18
    Veteran Racer TejanoTrackie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Ciudad de Vacas, Tejas
    My Bikes
    28 frames + 73 wheels
    Posts
    7,753
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    165 on the track, 165 on the road, 165 on the cross bike, 170 on the MTB
    What, Me Worry? - Alfred E. Neuman

    Quote Originally Posted by Dcv View Post
    I'd like to think i have as much money as brains.

  19. #19
    sɹɐʇsɟoןןnɟsʇıbɟɯo jdgesus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    seattle, too many links
    My Bikes
    fixed gear recumbent trike
    Posts
    3,990
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    170 on the fixed gear

    i have 175 on my road bike

    long legs are long
    Quote Originally Posted by yummygooey View Post
    crabon/campy/rapha/roadie-bro.

    next step is recumbent.




    my bikes | bike blog | beer blog | work 1 | work 2

  20. #20
    a bored kid hpmcardle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    East Lansing, MI
    My Bikes
    Year unknown CCM Targa conversion
    Posts
    177
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm 5'10" and I prefer 170. 165 is probably more practical for my size and avoiding pedal strike but 170 just feels good man.
    Quote Originally Posted by cc700 View Post
    i'm so icy hot i need to put bleach on my skids to keep my underwear as fresh as my street cred.

  21. #21
    Old fart JohnDThompson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Appleton WI
    My Bikes
    Several, mostly not name brands.
    Posts
    12,841
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    165 for FG, 170 for road bikes.

  22. #22
    i'll probably break it 91MF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,653
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    167.5 for track
    170 and 172.5s on my other bikes
    bike. throw. #MFDCR

  23. #23
    Senior Member PlattsVegas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Upstate, NY
    Posts
    332
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I use 160's to help reduce pedal strike on corners.
    Keepin' it real, while keepin' it safe

    how are your nipples? pointy?

  24. #24
    Fueled by Tigers Blood avner's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Echo Park, California
    Posts
    1,498
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by PlattsVegas View Post
    I use 160's to help reduce pedal strike on corners.
    its legs, they're like beer bottles.

    srsly, I couldn't imagine that. I'm 6'2, I run 170s, i'd be interested in trying 165s but I have a feeling they'll be too small.
    Quote Originally Posted by Leukybear View Post
    Genius.
    Quote Originally Posted by xkillemallx16 View Post
    Save your dignity and go back to hopping curbs on your langster.
    Quote Originally Posted by jdgesus View Post
    only thing cars are good for is hitting me

  25. #25
    Member Incoherentfool's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    41
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    175's so I can have 88 gear inches on my SS but still be able to climb the hills around here.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •