why brakeless is safe for an idiot like me
10-11-04, 02:39 AM
#1
//
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 766
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
i started writing this for the 'downhill skills' thread but then realized i want more attention for this big epiphany ive had:
ok i used to be harsh to the anti-brake crowd and now i dont have one either. it makes me feel a little silly and embarrassed and i almost put one back on just so i dont feel like such a loudmouthed hypocrite. but i think i have discovered a *new* reason to go brakeless despite all the old rants about zen and whatever that i still think are mostly crap.
to understand my epiphany you have to recall the mentality of a typical recreational weekend cyclist or the average bike commuter that can barely change a flat.. ask most people or look at their brake pads and its the rear brake they always use. why? the front brake scares them. they dont want to go over the handlebars. sheldon brown is adept in explaining the silliness of this view. when the bicyclist becomes *accustomed* to only using the rear brake, the front one surprises them by the drastically increased amount of stopping power it gives. they arent used to it and endo from their own inexperience -- not the brakes fault at all. in fact, the front brake can be used effectively by itself in most situations, especially on the road. it is better for cornering, etc. you might wonder how i am going to use my praise of the front handbrake, and specifically its superiority over the rear handbrake, to make a case for a much more inefficient form of braking - skidding the rear wheel...
i have ridden for at least six months if not a year without ever in any circumstances using my front handbrake. in fact, even in emergency circumstances (and there have been a couple of those) in which it would have helped, i was much too freaked out to remember it was even there. at this point i think that if i were to use it in one of these 'emergencies' (that the prudent fixed rider vows is its sole prupose on their bike) i might as well be the freewheel amateur i described above. ok so fine i have just de-evolved myself out of understanding the use of a handbrake. but at least now i can justify it to myself, even if it means i am just dumb and championing a regression .... at least i dont feel like a hypocrite!
the other day i went down a steep hill in the pouring rain with no problems and it made me happy. i still get that subtle panic but i have learned to like it. and a little nod to the zen thing --- if i hadnt been on a fixie i totally wouldve gone through the broken glass at the bottom. but instead i saw it twenty yards away in the night through the rain and my fogged up glasses.
ok i used to be harsh to the anti-brake crowd and now i dont have one either. it makes me feel a little silly and embarrassed and i almost put one back on just so i dont feel like such a loudmouthed hypocrite. but i think i have discovered a *new* reason to go brakeless despite all the old rants about zen and whatever that i still think are mostly crap.
to understand my epiphany you have to recall the mentality of a typical recreational weekend cyclist or the average bike commuter that can barely change a flat.. ask most people or look at their brake pads and its the rear brake they always use. why? the front brake scares them. they dont want to go over the handlebars. sheldon brown is adept in explaining the silliness of this view. when the bicyclist becomes *accustomed* to only using the rear brake, the front one surprises them by the drastically increased amount of stopping power it gives. they arent used to it and endo from their own inexperience -- not the brakes fault at all. in fact, the front brake can be used effectively by itself in most situations, especially on the road. it is better for cornering, etc. you might wonder how i am going to use my praise of the front handbrake, and specifically its superiority over the rear handbrake, to make a case for a much more inefficient form of braking - skidding the rear wheel...
i have ridden for at least six months if not a year without ever in any circumstances using my front handbrake. in fact, even in emergency circumstances (and there have been a couple of those) in which it would have helped, i was much too freaked out to remember it was even there. at this point i think that if i were to use it in one of these 'emergencies' (that the prudent fixed rider vows is its sole prupose on their bike) i might as well be the freewheel amateur i described above. ok so fine i have just de-evolved myself out of understanding the use of a handbrake. but at least now i can justify it to myself, even if it means i am just dumb and championing a regression .... at least i dont feel like a hypocrite!
the other day i went down a steep hill in the pouring rain with no problems and it made me happy. i still get that subtle panic but i have learned to like it. and a little nod to the zen thing --- if i hadnt been on a fixie i totally wouldve gone through the broken glass at the bottom. but instead i saw it twenty yards away in the night through the rain and my fogged up glasses.
Last edited by ephemeralskin; 10-11-04 at 02:44 AM.
10-11-04, 06:58 AM
#2
physics teacher
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 69
Bikes: IRO mark v
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
back in my MTB days (before i moved from the jungle of CT to the ... urban... jungle? of NYC) I had a completely F***ed rear wheel with a lousy brake which was impossible to adjust correctly. On the front, though, i had a nice Avid disc brake. I don't think it would be an exaggeration to say that i never used the rear brake, no matter how steep, how rocky or rooted the trail was.
Of course, my front brake was a disc brake. If you have a weak front brake, you probably need a rear brake to compensate to some degree or another.
Of course, my front brake was a disc brake. If you have a weak front brake, you probably need a rear brake to compensate to some degree or another.
10-11-04, 07:09 AM
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 328
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
During 10 years of road racing and associated training I can't remember using the rear brake more than a dozen times. During that time I also rode a fixie for a month in the early springs with only a front brake. I never let fixie zen win over single life prudence ;-) In my current hack mode I ride an MTB that has the rear brake disconnected.
10-11-04, 07:12 AM
#4
back2fixie
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: home of orville and wilbur
Posts: 92
Bikes: khs flite...phil hubs...dt swiss wheels...48/16 ratio
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ssorg
back in my MTB days (before i moved from the jungle of CT to the ... urban... jungle? of NYC) I had a completely F***ed rear wheel with a lousy brake which was impossible to adjust correctly. On the front, though, i had a nice Avid disc brake. I don't think it would be an exaggeration to say that i never used the rear brake, no matter how steep, how rocky or rooted the trail was.
Of course, my front brake was a disc brake. If you have a weak front brake, you probably need a rear brake to compensate to some degree or another.
Of course, my front brake was a disc brake. If you have a weak front brake, you probably need a rear brake to compensate to some degree or another.
