Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 24 of 24
  1. #1
    Cool guy. FixedFrank's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    My Bikes
    Pake chromoly steel track with a handbuilt 36h rear B-43 deep V wheel laced 3x to a fixed suzue pro max sb hub via DT double swiss butted spokes and prolock nips.
    Posts
    2
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    47X16 fixie ratio.

    So, I ride a 59cm Pake with a Velocity deep V rim with Soma everwear tires that have seen a few miles. I have yet to spin out, but I'm finding I'm having some trouble skidding, more so than I've had in the past with other bikes.
    I'm thinking it could be the gear ratio,

    47X16,

    which I'm not used to.
    I was wondering, in an environment like Seattle, what would be a better ratio for me to try out? I don't mind putting some leg work into hills, but I also don't mind spinning a little more.

    I would really just appreciate easier skidding.
    Suggestions please?
    (Like how I broke it up for easier skimming?)

  2. #2
    GONE~
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    6,745
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Try 47/17 first, if you don't like it, go 47/18.

    47/18 is a very good ratio for the hills.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    My Bikes
    Mercier Kilo TT, 1979 Rampar R2
    Posts
    58
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    lower the gearing, usually easier the skidding.

    personally have 48/17

    However, it's a matter of time you spend on a bike and skidding.

    just go out and practice!! I should go out and practice some keo spins..

  4. #4
    soft pedal zen Higher Class's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Gainesville, FL
    My Bikes
    LeMond Buenos Aires
    Posts
    488
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Have you skidded with deep wheels before? I've never ridden Veeps, but maybe it's more difficult to skid with a heavier wheel? I dunno. The ratio should be fine... I used to run 52/16.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    399
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've been running 47/17 for the past 6 months and it is by far the best ratio I've ridden so far. Get a 17t cog, you'd be surprised how much difference it makes.

  6. #6
    Bike Hoarder NikZak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    My Bikes
    80's Graecross Courier Fixie, 2010 Bauer Suburban, 1988 Thruster 300 Volt BMX
    Posts
    156
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i currently run 48x18 and gotta say it's a very versatile gear ratio but i've just ordered a 52t sugino chainwheel as i found i was spinning out a bit down hills which became a bit annoying... also the 3 skid patches i think will become a bit annoying while the 9 with 52x18 will be better in the long run
    Did you poop at that stop back there? I didn't pay $300 on brakes that save 150g to have you carrying around 600g of breakfast all day
    Quote Originally Posted by dsh View Post
    Get a brake, hipster.

  7. #7
    i'll probably break it 91MF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,653
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i run 47/16. its fine for hills.

    skid patch concerns on a ratio with only a few patches can be rectified by actually removing your wheel and rotating it a tooth once in a while. people should be trying to get a ratio that works for them in the area they ride, not determining if they will skid through a tire quickly or not based on skid patch numbers. light speed checking and skip stopping will have a tire lasting a lot longer than ripping 25ft sideways every time.
    bike. throw. #MFDCR

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    SoTex
    Posts
    92
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I was running 48x18 as well and agree it was a very versatile gear ratio. What do most believe to be the MOST versatile gear ratio? A little off this subject, sorry.

  9. #9
    Bike Hoarder NikZak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    My Bikes
    80's Graecross Courier Fixie, 2010 Bauer Suburban, 1988 Thruster 300 Volt BMX
    Posts
    156
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    thats about the most versatile ratio i reckon... good for medium grade hils and traffic in a town and not too bad for spinning down a hill
    Did you poop at that stop back there? I didn't pay $300 on brakes that save 150g to have you carrying around 600g of breakfast all day
    Quote Originally Posted by dsh View Post
    Get a brake, hipster.

  10. #10
    dsh
    dsh is offline
    Oh, you know... dsh's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    DC
    My Bikes
    '74 Schwinn Sports Tourer (Polo), S-Works E5 Team Festina (Chorus 11), Trek 2200 Bonded Carbon (Fixed), Trek 920 (7 speed IGH), Chesini Olimpiade SL (1x7)
    Posts
    2,838
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The only acceptable gear ratio is 51x23, all other gear ratios are wrong.

  11. #11
    Bike Hoarder NikZak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    My Bikes
    80's Graecross Courier Fixie, 2010 Bauer Suburban, 1988 Thruster 300 Volt BMX
    Posts
    156
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    why is 51x23 acceptable? why have such a large rear cog?

    i ask for education purposes not to be inflammatory
    Did you poop at that stop back there? I didn't pay $300 on brakes that save 150g to have you carrying around 600g of breakfast all day
    Quote Originally Posted by dsh View Post
    Get a brake, hipster.

  12. #12
    Senior Member Robofunc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    St. Petersburg, FL
    My Bikes
    Schwinn, Bottecchia, projects
    Posts
    917
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I ride 48 14 on one bike and 45 14 on another. They're both fine but, obviously, the 45 is a little easier going uphill. I don't skid, though. I'm more into the going faster part than the stopping all cool part.

  13. #13
    Old fart JohnDThompson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Appleton WI
    My Bikes
    Several, mostly not name brands.
    Posts
    12,641
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by 91MF View Post
    skid patch concerns on a ratio with only a few patches can be rectified by actually removing your wheel and rotating it a tooth once in a while.
    OP has a 47T ring. 47 is a prime number, so he will always have the maximum possible number of skid patches regardless of what cog size he uses. If you want easier skids, use a larger cog in back.

    people should be trying to get a ratio that works for them in the area they ride, not determining if they will skid through a tire quickly or not based on skid patch numbers. light speed checking and skip stopping will have a tire lasting a lot longer than ripping 25ft sideways every time.
    Agreed.

  14. #14
    dsh
    dsh is offline
    Oh, you know... dsh's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    DC
    My Bikes
    '74 Schwinn Sports Tourer (Polo), S-Works E5 Team Festina (Chorus 11), Trek 2200 Bonded Carbon (Fixed), Trek 920 (7 speed IGH), Chesini Olimpiade SL (1x7)
    Posts
    2,838
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by NikZak View Post
    why is 51x23 acceptable? why have such a large rear cog?

    i ask for education purposes not to be inflammatory
    I just grabbed some numbers out of the air. It's ridiculous to ask "what is the best/most versatile ratio". That is like asking "what is the best pants size?" or "what is the best shoe?"

    The answer depends on how strong you are, how you intend to use it, where you intend to ride it... a hundred different things.


    There are three pieces of useful information that can possibly be related in a thread like this:
    1) Higher gear ratios are harder to pedal but let you go faster
    2) Lower gear ratios are easier to pedal but your top speed will be less
    3) A good starting point is 65-70 gear inches

  15. #15
    Senior Member hamish5178's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,021
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by dsh View Post
    There are three pieces of useful information that can possibly be related in a thread like this:
    1) Higher gear ratios are harder to pedal but let you go faster
    2) Lower gear ratios are easier to pedal but your top speed will be less
    3) A good starting point is 65-70 gear inches
    4) Lower gear ratios will require a higher cadence when descending
    5) Lower gear ratios will be easier to stop/skid

  16. #16
    Veteran Racer TejanoTrackie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Ciudad de Vacas, Tejas
    My Bikes
    28 frames + 73 wheels
    Posts
    7,605
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    get some gears
    What, Me Worry? - Alfred E. Neuman

    Quote Originally Posted by Dcv View Post
    I'd like to think i have as much money as brains.

  17. #17
    Bike Hoarder NikZak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    My Bikes
    80's Graecross Courier Fixie, 2010 Bauer Suburban, 1988 Thruster 300 Volt BMX
    Posts
    156
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by dsh View Post
    There are three pieces of useful information that can possibly be related in a thread like this:
    1) Higher gear ratios are harder to pedal but let you go faster
    2) Lower gear ratios are easier to pedal but your top speed will be less
    3) A good starting point is 65-70 gear inches
    Quote Originally Posted by hamish5178 View Post
    4) Lower gear ratios will require a higher cadence when descending
    5) Lower gear ratios will be easier to stop/skid
    completely agree... but he is asking what people suggest might be a good starting point

    as has been mentioned on this entire forum OP, anywhere between 65-75 gear inches is a good start for most riding... you have to sort yourself out from there on it

    chainwheels aren't all that expensive and a nice collection will make your bike very versatile
    Did you poop at that stop back there? I didn't pay $300 on brakes that save 150g to have you carrying around 600g of breakfast all day
    Quote Originally Posted by dsh View Post
    Get a brake, hipster.

  18. #18
    i'll probably break it 91MF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,653
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnDThompson View Post
    OP has a 47T ring. 47 is a prime number, so he will always have the maximum possible number of skid patches regardless of what cog size he uses. If you want easier skids, use a larger cog in back.
    i understood that. i was making ref to the post above mine that commented on skid patches which, in my opinion, are a complete non-issue. ever.

    thanks for agreeing with me.
    bike. throw. #MFDCR

  19. #19
    i'll probably break it 91MF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,653
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by TejanoTrackie View Post
    get some gears
    this. if you dont have the anaerobic[sp? meaning? or do i mean aerobic? lulz] range to ride a singlespeed/fixed gear, then dont.
    bike. throw. #MFDCR

  20. #20
    Bike Hoarder NikZak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    My Bikes
    80's Graecross Courier Fixie, 2010 Bauer Suburban, 1988 Thruster 300 Volt BMX
    Posts
    156
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    anaerobic is exercise or 'respiration' without the used of oxygen in the respiratory process (ie, short bursts of energy expenditure - sprinting)
    aerobic refers to long term extended exercise utilising oxygen as a part of the energy producing equation

    aerobic system produces more energy from a unit of glucose than anaerobic system but it is a much slower system and responds to extended exercise

    both are relevant in riding a fixed gear (or any) bicycle, depending on the type of terrain you are riding in
    Did you poop at that stop back there? I didn't pay $300 on brakes that save 150g to have you carrying around 600g of breakfast all day
    Quote Originally Posted by dsh View Post
    Get a brake, hipster.

  21. #21
    extra bitter kyselad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    My Bikes
    Bridgestone Kabuki, Miyata Ninety
    Posts
    1,558
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by dsh View Post
    I just grabbed some numbers out of the air. It's ridiculous to ask "what is the best/most versatile ratio". That is like asking "what is the best pants size?" or "what is the best shoe?"

    The answer depends on how strong you are, how you intend to use it, where you intend to ride it... a hundred different things.


    There are three pieces of useful information that can possibly be related in a thread like this:
    1) Higher gear ratios are harder to pedal but let you go faster
    2) Lower gear ratios are easier to pedal but your top speed will be less
    3) A good starting point is 65-70 gear inches
    This. Not to pick on the OP, but I never understand these threads, which invariably devolve into pissing matches. Honestly, if I were a mod, I'd kill them on sight. Fixed/ss bikes are a gearing compromise, and each rider needs to decide what gearing best reflects his or her needs. Or get gears.

  22. #22
    Senior Member seau grateau's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    LA
    My Bikes
    Shogun Selectra (geared), Affinity Lo Pro (fixed)
    Posts
    5,482
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by NikZak View Post
    why is 51x23 acceptable? why have such a large rear cog?

    i ask for education purposes not to be inflammatory
    Prime numbers --> Prime drivetrain.
    Quote Originally Posted by adriano View Post
    thanckx.
    Quote Originally Posted by Nagrom_ View Post
    "I made love to your mother dozens of times last week, and she doesnt know what a worn chain ring looks like"

  23. #23
    . bbattle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Huntsville, Alabama
    My Bikes
    2014 Trek Domane 5.2, 1985 Pinarello Trevisio, 1991 Colnago Master, '06 Bianchi San Jose, 1987 Moulton Fuso, '80's Gardin Shred?, '82 John Howard(Dave Tesch)
    Posts
    11,728
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've only been able to really skid when I do a panic brake and I've got both brake levers clamped down AND I'm locked up on the cranks. Then I skid like a pro.

    I use a 42-15 ratio. And front and rear brakes.

    OP, if you are having trouble skidding at your gear ratio, going to a lower one will make it easier. Also easier to climb but you'll be spinning a higher cadence on the flats. Don't hesitate to swap cogs; it's the only way to find "your" gear ratio. When I first got my San Jose, it was with a 42-17. After a while, it was obviously too low a gear. I went to the 42-15 and stayed there.

    Don't worry about what everyone else is riding(or claiming to ride with); go with whatever works for you. Personally, I wouldn't go brakeless. Just because the brakes are there doesn't mean you can't skid but having the brakes there makes things so much easier and safer.

  24. #24
    沒有腳踏車的居民 PluperfectArson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Honolulu, HI
    My Bikes
    Mericier Kilo TT Pro
    Posts
    1,287
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Chris Hoy's ratio or bust.
    Quote Originally Posted by 505oh505 View Post
    cause it's campy s/r pista fool.
    Quote Originally Posted by GMJ View Post
    I would rather rock macaframa than mash. I liked their movie better.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •