Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
Reload this Page >

Uncle Sixty's Gearing Primer for Newbs

Search
Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

Uncle Sixty's Gearing Primer for Newbs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-21-11, 04:54 PM
  #26  
Bicycle Repair Man !!!
Thread Starter
 
Sixty Fiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: YEG
Posts: 27,267

Bikes: See my sig...

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Liked 129 Times in 96 Posts
Originally Posted by revelstone
now now lets not write anything in stone. i ride a ss/fg, 700 wheels, 44/16 gearing. and i like it more than my 21 speed mountain bike that's spending most of march and the rest of summer and most of it not all of fall in the shed. same as last year. i'll be 55 on my next birthday.
Dude... I'm 45 and should be trading in my fixed gear bikes for gearies too.

Have re-geared a few of them but this stems from a back injury that affects my ability to mash up hills and not because I am "old".

Could still hand a few people their asses on a ride as long as I can spin like a gerbil on crack.
Sixty Fiver is offline  
Old 03-21-11, 04:56 PM
  #27  
Bicycle Repair Man !!!
Thread Starter
 
Sixty Fiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: YEG
Posts: 27,267

Bikes: See my sig...

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Liked 129 Times in 96 Posts
Originally Posted by NikZak
i think this thread should be subtitled:

"Now noobs have no excuse to post new threads about gear inches every three days"
Have you noticed any more "how many gear inches ?" threads since this was posted ?

I think Scrod closes them and puts a link to this thread in when he does it... or should.
Sixty Fiver is offline  
Old 03-21-11, 05:11 PM
  #28  
Bicycle Repair Man !!!
Thread Starter
 
Sixty Fiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: YEG
Posts: 27,267

Bikes: See my sig...

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Liked 129 Times in 96 Posts
Originally Posted by Decepticondc5
noob question:

would a persons weight affect what gear ratio they should select?
Not really... I am small and light (built like Contador) and despite having some really good power I can't lay it down to the max because it puts way too much stress on my back.

But I have always been able to spin like a mo'fo so work hard at that... old school time trialists rocked a gearing in the mid to high 70's to knock down sub hour 40's and the lesson here is that to go fast you don't need a big gear if you can spin those cranks a little faster.

My business partner is a big guy (275 pounds) and an ex racer who has amazing cardio and the ability to mash some pretty big gears as well... even in his 70's he was running a 54 tooth crank on his touring bike and could climb in gears that would destroy most people's knees and lungs.

Said that when he got tested for cardio and pulmonary function his numbers were unheard of... he was having dizzy spells after working out that were caused by a state much like hyperoxia or hyper ventilating.

He has been a test subject at one of our hospitals for a few decades because of this... doctors thought that a really big 70 year old guy with a resting pulse of <50 must have had a heart problem but it is just that his VO2 max is so incredibly high his heart does not have to work very hard and when it does he suffers from a little O2 overload that causes dizziness.

We can only wish to have this problem.
Sixty Fiver is offline  
Old 03-25-11, 12:44 PM
  #29  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: A1A
Posts: 588
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
jeez...i would have thought this thread would do more business, but maybe since it is titled a primer for noobs, the veterans here have their gearing down & don't really have much use for it. or perhaps i am the only dunce that just is never 100% satisfied with any gear ratio/inches i run

anyway, heres my latest dilemma...

i am this close to ordering a new bike that offers lots of chainring & cog options in the build.

my problem is that i just do not care for the usual gear ratio suspects due the local terrain & my riding style. it is as flat here as my 1st girlfriend was. i have to purposely go out of my way to ride on the few bridges over the inter-coastal waterway to get any incline at all & only 1 of those is even slightly challenging.

the upshot is that right now i am runnning a 14t cog with a 46t chainring. i have no problem keeping up a pretty good cadence or riding over any of the previously mentioned bridges & outside of the occasional stiff headwind i still sometimes wish i had even more gear-inches. not to mention that while I don’t think of myself as a participant in silly commuter racing, it does still gripe me a bit when I am chugging along pretty good & a roadie blows by me pedaling lazily along in the biggest ratio on his 20 or 30-something speed & i know i can not keep up no matter how much I spin.

so tell me…am I crazy to be considering ordering the new bike with a 48t chainring & a 13t or even 12t cog? those small cogs are bad on chain-wear right? i know I would be better off with a bigger ring & a bigger cog but the 48t is the largest they offer.

thanx for any suggestions…
markaitch is offline  
Old 03-25-11, 01:16 PM
  #30  
GONE~
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,747
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by markaitch
so tell me…am I crazy to be considering ordering the new bike with a 48t chainring & a 13t or even 12t cog? those small cogs are bad on chain-wear right? i know I would be better off with a bigger ring & a bigger cog but the 48t is the largest they offer.
Here's your answer to everything:
Originally Posted by Sixty Fiver
and the lesson here is that to go fast you don't need a big gear if you can spin those cranks a little faster.
Squirrelli is offline  
Old 03-25-11, 01:58 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
caloso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur

Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times in 1,417 Posts
48x12 = 105 g.i. = 28mph @ 90rpm

Is that crazy? It would be for me, but maybe not for you.
caloso is offline  
Old 03-25-11, 02:29 PM
  #32  
Bicycle Repair Man !!!
Thread Starter
 
Sixty Fiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: YEG
Posts: 27,267

Bikes: See my sig...

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Liked 129 Times in 96 Posts
Originally Posted by caloso
48x12 = 105 g.i. = 28mph @ 90rpm

Is that crazy? It would be for me, but maybe not for you.
It works if your name is Boonen or Merckx or you ride in a vacuum.

Running the numbers is one thing, pushing those numbers is another... have experimented with a 100 gear inch drive and found that I go faster when I can spin at 120 rpm and not destroy my knees at 90... and it does not allow for any snappy acceleration, hills, or wind.

Worked with a messenger who insisted that his nearly 100 gear inches made him faster except he was probably the slowest messenger I ever saw... had no jump and by the time he got up to speed you'd be a mile down the road dropping off your next package.

Highest day to day gear I ever ran was 82 and was out for a ride working on my TT speed and found myself riding parallel to a course that had been set up for one of our many triathlons which I don't pay much attention to.

Ended up pacing a bunch of these guys for a few miles and got a few thumbs up from the riders as I wasn't dressed like a superhero and was riding a 30 year old steel conversion... and was not having any trouble keeping up.

Have been passed in the same way too... have been out there killing it and had a few people on fixed and geared bikes blow by me like I was parked.

They must have been on crack.
Sixty Fiver is offline  
Old 03-25-11, 03:16 PM
  #33  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: A1A
Posts: 588
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
ok...
so you guys are telling me i am really better off spinning more @ lower ratio/inches? makes sense.
hope you didn't get me wrong earlier, i do keep up a purty damn quick cadence most of the time with my current set-up, but it is nice to sort of "lope" along & rest sometimes, especially on the long rides.
btw, i have cogs from 14t-19t, can't seem to keep myself from experimenting constantly & bigger g.i. just feels better to me.
well then, waddaya think about my 46x14, is it so turrible?
markaitch is offline  
Old 03-25-11, 03:21 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
caloso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur

Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times in 1,417 Posts
FWIW, we have a flat 10 mile TT series here, and when I've done it Merckx-style, I've run 52x15 (94 g.i.) on my FG. It's still pretty heavy if you get any kind of headwind, but that's the challenge of doing a fixed TT, right?
caloso is offline  
Old 03-25-11, 04:21 PM
  #35  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: A1A
Posts: 588
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by caloso
...I've run 52x15 (94 g.i.) on my FG. It's still pretty heavy if you get any kind of headwind, but that's the challenge of doing a fixed TT, right?
52x15...ummmm....i like that
markaitch is offline  
Old 03-25-11, 05:28 PM
  #36  
Senior Member
 
macnab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Fogtown
Posts: 184

Bikes: Litton, Gunnar, Iro

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
There was an epic post around gearing and stopping without skiddnig that Ken Cox posted (recently?) I can't find it, but it belongs in this thread.
macnab is offline  
Old 03-25-11, 07:01 PM
  #37  
Senior Member
 
iBgearLess's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 190

Bikes: Surly Steamroller

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I was running 46x17 for a long time and then went to 46x18 and am very happy with it. I don't race, not in much of hurry to get anywhere so it works perfect for me. If I do trail riding on my FG I switch to a 19 tooth cog.
iBgearLess is offline  
Old 04-06-11, 03:18 PM
  #38  
Member
 
Affixed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 34
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Isn't there an iPhone app that does this all for you?
Affixed is offline  
Old 04-13-11, 12:48 AM
  #39  
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 30
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
what do you guys think about 49/16? im currently riding 49/17 but wanted a little more challenge and maybe a higher speed. thanks!
treefilly is offline  
Old 04-13-11, 12:59 AM
  #40  
Bicycle Repair Man !!!
Thread Starter
 
Sixty Fiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: YEG
Posts: 27,267

Bikes: See my sig...

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Liked 129 Times in 96 Posts
Originally Posted by treefilly
what do you guys think about 49/16? im currently riding 49/17 but wanted a little more challenge and maybe a higher speed. thanks!
How long can you spin that 49:17 @ 90 rpm ?

How often do you spin it at 100... or 120 ?

If you are not regularly spinning out the gear you have now a taller gear is going to slow you down as your cadence will drop... think I have spoken often of riders dropping from an 80 gear inch ratio to one in the mid to high 70's and finding they got faster and could farther at higher speed.
Sixty Fiver is offline  
Old 04-13-11, 01:21 AM
  #41  
GONE~
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,747
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by treefilly
what do you guys think about 49/16?
I think it's stupid and you should learn to spin a lower gear ratio.
Squirrelli is offline  
Old 04-13-11, 09:40 PM
  #42  
Junior Member
 
Corwings's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: OR
Posts: 139
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sixty Fiver
How long can you spin that 49:17 @ 90 rpm ?

How often do you spin it at 100... or 120 ?

If you are not regularly spinning out the gear you have now a taller gear is going to slow you down as your cadence will drop... think I have spoken often of riders dropping from an 80 gear inch ratio to one in the mid to high 70's and finding they got faster and could farther at higher speed.

Recently dropped to 42/17 on my second bike/the one with a brake to accomplish two tasks; 1) Get better at spinning, and 2) climb a little easier.
So far so good
Corwings is offline  
Old 04-13-11, 11:29 PM
  #43  
Bicycle Repair Man !!!
Thread Starter
 
Sixty Fiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: YEG
Posts: 27,267

Bikes: See my sig...

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Liked 129 Times in 96 Posts
Track season is upon us here and for the next 4 weeks the guys will be riding 74 gear inches to develop their spin before they move up into the low 80's... considering here that the track is smooth and there are no hills and no wind that one has to deal with.

In the old days people started training by doing 1000 miles on a 74-76 inch gear and this is what was often used on the open road to knock down sub hour 40's... you have to spin that at 110 rpm or more for a full hour to knock this down and have to deal with wind and grades.
Sixty Fiver is offline  
Old 04-14-11, 06:45 AM
  #44  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 133
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by caloso
48x12 = 105 g.i. = 28mph @ 90rpm
for anyone wanting to see the math behind that calculation.

it confused me until i learnt that gi is the diameter of the imaginary "wheel" not the circumference.

so let's see:

105gi x 3.14 x 90rpm = 29700 inches/minute.

29700 inches/minute x 60 (minutes) = 1782000 inches/hour.

1782000 inches an hour divided by 63360 (inches in a mile) = 28.125 miles an hour

there we have it, bang on target.

it's interesting that the 48x12 gearing means you're somehow driving an imaginary wheel 105 inches in diameter. that's a big wheel.
tristen is offline  
Old 04-14-11, 09:43 AM
  #45  
Bicycle Repair Man !!!
Thread Starter
 
Sixty Fiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: YEG
Posts: 27,267

Bikes: See my sig...

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Liked 129 Times in 96 Posts
Originally Posted by tristen
for anyone wanting to see the math behind that calculation.

it confused me until i learnt that gi is the diameter of the imaginary "wheel" not the circumference.

so let's see:

105gi x 3.14 x 90rpm = 29700 inches/minute.

29700 inches/minute x 60 (minutes) = 1782000 inches/hour.

1782000 inches an hour divided by 63360 (inches in a mile) = 28.125 miles an hour

there we have it, bang on target.

it's interesting that the 48x12 gearing means you're somehow driving an imaginary wheel 105 inches in diameter. that's a big wheel.
chain ring teeth x wheel diameter in inches / cog teeth = gear inches.

Sixty Fiver is offline  
Old 04-14-11, 11:06 AM
  #46  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 792

Bikes: Brodie Force w/ Xtracycle, Dahon Helios, Merida Folding, Pacific Carryme, Softride Classic

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Permit me to add to this discussion. Use the formulas referenced in the posts above to calculate what chain rings and cogs you need.

Online calculators are available here:
https://software.bareknucklebrigade.c...it.applet.html (does not work with Google Chrome)
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/gears/

Your preferred gear inch will depend on:
- how fit you are
- how strong you are
- the terrain you do 90% of your riding
- the wind conditions for the majority of your riding
- how many skid patches you want (if that's important to you)


Since most riders cannot perceive a 1 gear inch difference, consider the following gear ranges with soft edges, not binary precision.

60-65 gear inches = good for older riders or weak knees or touring.

66 gear inches = good all round gear for flats and hills. Not too slow on the flats, not too hard on the hills and wind. Touring is even possible. Great acceleration from standstill.

69 gear inches = near ideal for most people and most applications unless you are exceptionally strong. City gear and hills are feasible.

70-73 gear inches = superb range. At 100 rpm, it produces 21.4 mph (34.5 km/h). At 100 rpm, the force required to turn the pedals is still relatively light. Anything is this gear range produces an excellent balance between acceleration, hill climbing, combating winds and flat road speed. Note that at 20 mph (32.2 km/h), approximately 80% of the power being produced by the human body is being used to overcome air resistance. This is why it is so hard to sustain any speed above 20 mph (32.2 km/h) during a daily commute. If you know how to spin, this gear range will not be slowing you down.

76 -81 gear inches = this range maybe useful in places where there are no hills and where riding with a slow cadence is preferred to riding with a rapid cadence. All other things being equal, one will sweat less pushing a larger gear with a slow cadence at low speeds (say up to 15 mph) versus a lower gear with a high cadence. All bets are off if you push a large gear with a high cadence! This range is also harder on the knees due to the pedal force required to turn the cranks. Acceleration from a standstill will be noticeably slower than gears in the high 60s and low 70s. It's a tall gear for city riding and sprinting from traffic to traffic light and intersections. Hills will also slow you down in a big way.

81 and up gear inches = velodrome racing gears in controlled conditions, and short term training applications.

These are my opinions only based on general observation, lots and lots of reading and learning from others who have gone before. I'm sure someone will say, "But I ride 92 gear inches and it takes me everywhere!". My reply would be, "Good for you. I hope you have money for the knee surgeries you're gonna need."

Find a gear low enough that allows you to climb the highest hill you need to ride on a regular basis and use that as a starting point for your singlespeed and fixed gear riding. With FG, you need to ensure the gear you pick is high enough that you can ride DOWN the tallest hill you've just climbed.

Best wishes,
Victor

Last edited by puppypilgrim; 04-14-11 at 11:09 AM.
puppypilgrim is offline  
Old 04-14-11, 11:37 AM
  #47  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 109
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Great thread and I enjoyed your post Squirrelli
sulr is offline  
Old 04-14-11, 04:32 PM
  #48  
No Money and No Sense
 
sillygolem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Anderson, MO
Posts: 705
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Decepticondc5
noob question:

would a persons weight affect what gear ratio they should select?
I am a clyde and I just converted a bike boom 10 speed (29 lbs. with its original freewheel and derailleurs) to SS. I live in a hilly area and I'm running about 73 gear inches (46t chainring, 17t freewheel, 27 1 1/4" tires) and it works fine.

However, this bike has a steep seat tube which lets me stomp hard. I think I would probably want to go with lower gearing if I was riding a more relaxed geometry.
sillygolem is offline  
Old 04-14-11, 04:39 PM
  #49  
Senior Member
 
caloso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur

Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times in 1,417 Posts
Great post, puppypilgrim.
caloso is offline  
Old 04-14-11, 06:08 PM
  #50  
Singlespeed Converted!
 
fattybikejones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Southeast Wisconsin
Posts: 97

Bikes: !. Bridgestone 300 SS conversion

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Just ordered my first SS for round town and fun rides.. No big grinder climbs where I am riding.. Stock gearing is 46 / 16.. hafta see how that all works out.. Oh yeah, I'm 48
fattybikejones is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.