Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
Reload this Page >

Uncle Sixty's Gearing Primer for Newbs

Search
Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

Uncle Sixty's Gearing Primer for Newbs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-20-12, 12:18 AM
  #76  
Bicycle Repair Man !!!
Thread Starter
 
Sixty Fiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: YEG
Posts: 27,267

Bikes: See my sig...

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Liked 129 Times in 96 Posts
Originally Posted by bigbris1
hai uncle 60
Where has you been ?

Rehabbing those knees ?
Sixty Fiver is offline  
Old 01-25-12, 09:03 AM
  #77  
Junior Member
 
BezO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 141
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
These are excellent descriptions! I went with 46/17 (73.5 GI) with a bailout of 46/19 (65.8 GI) on 700x35c tires.
Originally Posted by puppypilgrim
60-65 gear inches = good for older riders or weak knees or touring.

66 gear inches = good all round gear for flats and hills. Not too slow on the flats, not too hard on the hills and wind. Touring is even possible. Great acceleration from standstill.
46/19... I've only ridden this a few miles just to test it out. Not too bad on flats but excellent on hills. My ride home always includes a one block long, fairly steep hill and this was perfect. Still challenging but way more fun being able to keep up some type of cadence. And the mile of slight incline before the hill was great.

Not enough GIs to be my all around gearing though. A little too much spin on flats. I'll see if I'm up to switching gears for the commute home everyday.

Originally Posted by puppypilgrim
70-73 gear inches = superb range. At 100 rpm, it produces 21.4 mph (34.5 km/h). At 100 rpm, the force required to turn the pedals is still relatively light. Anything is this gear range produces an excellent balance between acceleration, hill climbing, combating winds and flat road speed. Note that at 20 mph (32.2 km/h), approximately 80% of the power being produced by the human body is being used to overcome air resistance. This is why it is so hard to sustain any speed above 20 mph (32.2 km/h) during a daily commute. If you know how to spin, this gear range will not be slowing you down.
46/17... pefect all around gearing for me. I've commuted 2 1/2 times with this gearing. I immediately noticed the difference from 46/16. Much better acceleration. More spin at top speed. I don't have a speedometer, but I felt I was as fast as I was with 46/16. Fun on slight upgrades and not that bad on that one block long hill to get home.

I can't wait to try both gearings this weekend in the park. I'm guessing 46/17 will be near perfect; great on flats and quite challenging, hopefully still fun on the inclines. While 46/19 will be great for the inclines and not so great on the flats and declines. I'm sure it will be fun trying both.
BezO is offline  
Old 02-12-12, 03:50 AM
  #78  
Senior Member
 
GENESTARWIND's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: las vegas
Posts: 1,938

Bikes: purty blue undefeated II 57cm

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Liked 15 Times in 9 Posts
I started on 46/18 with single and dropped to 46/17 on my first fixed setup. its good so far.
GENESTARWIND is offline  
Old 02-22-12, 11:40 PM
  #79  
Brown Bear, Sqrl Hunter
 
Jaytron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 4,244

Bikes: CAAD 10 4, Dolan DF4, Fuji Track Classic

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Liked 26 Times in 15 Posts
Originally Posted by GENESTARWIND
I started on 46/18 with single and dropped to 46/17 on my first fixed setup. its good so far.
Wouldn't that be gearing up, not dropping?
Jaytron is offline  
Old 03-05-12, 08:04 PM
  #80  
Newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
When I first starting riding fixed (around town not on the track) it was a 47/16 which is a 77.5, and I found it too low. Maybe I wasn't used to spinning so much, I felt like I was topping out and I couldn't go faster.

After awhile I upped it to a 47/15 (82.7) and I kept it at that. I ussualy ride about 20 miles a week commuting back and forth from my girl friends, my ride home has a pretty steep hill, but not that bad (~500ft climb total distance), and though I had to really push up the hill, I was OK with it.

When I built my new all city bike the chain ring I got was a 46, and I ordered a 15t and 14t for each side of the rear cog. When I first put it together I ran a 46/15 (80.9) which was actually pretty nice around town.

A couple weeks ago I flipped my rear tire to the 14t and have been riding the 46/14 (86.7) around town since then, and I honestly feel a bit slower on it than any of my other ratios. I just can't keep up my spin at that ratio, not in the city anyways.

So now with all this knowledge of what its like -for me- to ride a 77.5,80.9,82.7, and 86.7 I feel like for me something in the high 70s low 80s is ideal for me. I'll probably switch my hub around and ride the 80.9 for around the city.

My whole point in all of this is that its important for YOU to try a bunch of different ratios. I personally feel like @Sixty Fiver and @puppypilgrim recommendations are a little too low for me. But most of my friends actually ride between a 70-75 tops and most other forms I read people talk about 75 being too high for them. Is it just me or does anyone else get frustrated at low to mid 70s? Seems like I might be an outlier, or maybe I haven't figured out/don't want to spin that fast to go fast.

Last edited by blissofbeing; 03-05-12 at 08:08 PM.
blissofbeing is offline  
Old 03-05-12, 10:52 PM
  #81  
Bicycle Repair Man !!!
Thread Starter
 
Sixty Fiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: YEG
Posts: 27,267

Bikes: See my sig...

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Liked 129 Times in 96 Posts
Originally Posted by blissofbeing
My whole point in all of this is that its important for YOU to try a bunch of different ratios. I personally feel like @Sixty Fiver and @puppypilgrim recommendations are a little too low for me. But most of my friends actually ride between a 70-75 tops and most other forms I read people talk about 75 being too high for them. Is it just me or does anyone else get frustrated at low to mid 70s? Seems like I might be an outlier, or maybe I haven't figured out/don't want to spin that fast to go fast.
Most of your friends probably spin like gerbils on crack and you said you ride 20 miles a week... I used to ride 265 miles a week on a single gearing of 76 GI so running that gearing in the mid seventies was also about endurance and having a gear for every situation.

I also use to ride at 80 gear inches and laid down the same mileage... dropping 4 gear inches just let me spin up a little faster and did not affect my top speed save for the fact I could hold it longer and keep things steadier over varied terrain.
Sixty Fiver is offline  
Old 03-10-12, 10:47 AM
  #82  
Newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
what range is my gear ratio? im running 48-18 just droped down from 48-16.
ATleastHEtries is offline  
Old 03-27-12, 06:44 AM
  #83  
Your cog is slipping.
 
Scrodzilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 26,053
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 640 Post(s)
Liked 100 Times in 58 Posts
Extra medium.
Scrodzilla is offline  
Old 03-27-12, 08:53 AM
  #84  
Member
 
jlind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 30
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ATleastHEtries
what range is my gear ratio? im running 48-18 just droped down from 48-16.
Precisely, it's now 8:3 down from 3:1 (or 24:9 down from 24:8).
jlind is offline  
Old 04-19-12, 10:28 PM
  #85  
Senior Member
 
GENESTARWIND's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: las vegas
Posts: 1,938

Bikes: purty blue undefeated II 57cm

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Liked 15 Times in 9 Posts
so right now I run a 17/46 and I may be picking up omniums on the super cheap but it has a 52 chainring. what size cog would I have to drop to, to keep the same setup?
GENESTARWIND is offline  
Old 04-19-12, 10:33 PM
  #86  
Fixie Infamous
 
Nagrom_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: SF
Posts: 10,474

Bikes: 2007 CAAD Optimo Track, 2012 Cannondale CAAD10, 1996 GT Force restomod, 2015 Cannondale CAADX

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 54 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by GENESTARWIND
so right now I run a 17/46 and I may be picking up omniums on the super cheap but it has a 52 chainring. what size cog would I have to drop to, to keep the same setup?
17/46? 9.75 gear inches. I like it.

46/17 = 71.4GI

52/18 = 76.2GI
52/19 = 72.2GI
52/20 = 68.6GI

Take your pick.
Nagrom_ is offline  
Old 04-19-12, 10:34 PM
  #87  
Senior Member
 
Spoonrobot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,063
Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1216 Post(s)
Liked 183 Times in 116 Posts
52/19 is just a hair larger.
Spoonrobot is offline  
Old 04-19-12, 10:40 PM
  #88  
Senior Member
 
GENESTARWIND's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: las vegas
Posts: 1,938

Bikes: purty blue undefeated II 57cm

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Liked 15 Times in 9 Posts
so 52/19 I shouldn't notice much of a difference?
GENESTARWIND is offline  
Old 04-20-12, 08:00 PM
  #89  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: central Ohio
Posts: 926

Bikes: Schwinn Madison, Windsor Dover

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by GENESTARWIND
so 52/19 I shouldn't notice much of a difference?
Not too much.
bfloyd6969 is offline  
Old 04-25-12, 03:33 AM
  #90  
Senior Member
 
GENESTARWIND's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: las vegas
Posts: 1,938

Bikes: purty blue undefeated II 57cm

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Liked 15 Times in 9 Posts
turns out the crankset i bought had a 49, not a 52. so ill be running 17/49 for now, see how i like it and maybe ill jump up to a 18 later i dunno..
GENESTARWIND is offline  
Old 08-18-12, 10:28 AM
  #91  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 21
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hello! I'm gathering information for my MTB to fixed commuter conversion.
Sorry if this question has been asked already, but is there any difference between 38/15 gearing and 42/17 or 45/18 gearing? All give 2.5 gain ratio and 65 gear inches for my 26 wheel.
Logically the 38/15 will weight less, but will it ride the same as 45/18?
Skinner is offline  
Old 08-18-12, 11:15 AM
  #92  
Senior Member
 
Spoonrobot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,063
Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1216 Post(s)
Liked 183 Times in 116 Posts
It's generally accepted that larger chain-rings and cogs wear slower than smaller combos so you'd probably want to use the 45/18 gearing. Weight difference should be negligible and all should ride the same if they have the same gain/gear inches.
Spoonrobot is offline  
Old 08-18-12, 12:18 PM
  #93  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 129
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Skinner
Hello! I'm gathering information for my MTB to fixed commuter conversion.
Sorry if this question has been asked already, but is there any difference between 38/15 gearing and 42/17 or 45/18 gearing? All give 2.5 gain ratio and 65 gear inches for my 26 wheel.
Logically the 38/15 will weight less, but will it ride the same as 45/18?
Also be sure you have the chainstay clearance for the 42t or 45t chainrings. My MTB conversion just barely took a 41t on a single speed crank.
tomatsu is offline  
Old 10-17-12, 11:25 AM
  #94  
Senior Member
 
silmarillion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 720

Bikes: 2012 Cinelli Mystic Rat, Nashbar CX

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Who has the best selection of chainrings/gears? I did a search in google but got tired of wading through hundreds of BMX parts...


What brands are the best?
silmarillion is offline  
Old 10-17-12, 12:31 PM
  #95  
Senior Member
 
Spoonrobot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,063
Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1216 Post(s)
Liked 183 Times in 116 Posts
I like Retro-gression for cogs and Bens Cycle for chainrings.

Locally, Loose Nuts in Grant Park has (or had, it's been a while since I've been there) a good selection of fixed gear stuff since they got a bunch of stock when No Brakes closed.

If you're not picky about running 3/32 stuff you can usually find some good used cogs/rings at So-Po.
Spoonrobot is offline  
Old 10-17-12, 01:51 PM
  #96  
Senior Member
 
silmarillion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 720

Bikes: 2012 Cinelli Mystic Rat, Nashbar CX

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks!

I'll check them out. I want to get a bigger chainring for riding on the flats. I think the 46 is fine for the commute, but I need a little more if I ride flat terrain.
silmarillion is offline  
Old 10-17-12, 01:59 PM
  #97  
pro in someone's theory
 
prooftheory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Las Cruces, NM
Posts: 3,236

Bikes: FTP

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 72 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by silmarillion
I'll check them out. I want to get a bigger chainring for riding on the flats. I think the 46 is fine for the commute, but I need a little more if I ride flat terrain.
Did you actually read the first post of this thread? I'd recommend it.
prooftheory is offline  
Old 10-17-12, 06:52 PM
  #98  
Senior Member
 
silmarillion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 720

Bikes: 2012 Cinelli Mystic Rat, Nashbar CX

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by prooftheory
Did you actually read the first post of this thread? I'd recommend it.
Well yeah. I read through most of the first posts...Good stuff. Her' post Nazi.
silmarillion is offline  
Old 10-17-12, 07:20 PM
  #99  
pro in someone's theory
 
prooftheory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Las Cruces, NM
Posts: 3,236

Bikes: FTP

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 72 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Then why do you believe that a 46t chainring is too small "for flats"?
prooftheory is offline  
Old 10-17-12, 07:45 PM
  #100  
Senior Member
 
silmarillion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 720

Bikes: 2012 Cinelli Mystic Rat, Nashbar CX

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by prooftheory
Then why do you believe that a 46t chainring is too small "for flats"?
Because my cadence is too high on the flat areas I do ride. If I go to the the Silver Comet Trail, which is pretty flat. I would like to be able to ride a little faster and keep my cadence around 100-110.

Is this a bad thing? If it is, then I guess you got me.

Sorry I asked.
silmarillion is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.