Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 17 of 17
  1. #1
    Senior Member bike manhattan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    Posts
    169
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Crank and Chain Ring "Upgrade". Any Point?

    So I realized that I have upgraded every single component on my original stock 2005 Langster outside of the headset and the Crank/Chain Ring. Some of these were do to parts breaking over time (bottom bracket, bent rim from a crash, etc.), and other for cosmetic reasons (silver seat post, more attractive stem). Each time I upgraded I generally sprung for higher quality components. Anyway, not trying to just toss my money away or anything but I was wondering if there is any real point in upgrading to a higher end crank or chain ring performance wise. I think whatever is on there now is pretty good but I have noticed that there are some mighty expensive cranks out there and am wondering what is to be gained outside of aesthetics from buying one of these. Cheers.
    Left NYC and moved back to Philly, now i am stuck with an ironic user name

  2. #2
    i smell bacon yummygooey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    My Bikes
    GT Edge Ti, Spooky Skeletor, Soma Grand Randonneur, TET Track, Trek 6500 MTB
    Posts
    5,598
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You'll notice an upgraded crankset more than you noticed your seatpost.
    // yummygooey

  3. #3
    Paste Taster Retem's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Denver, Co
    My Bikes
    1970's kobe, Jury Bike, Dahon Boardwalk S1, Moto Outcast 29, Scrambler v3
    Posts
    4,390
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    if you get the right gear it will be considerably lighter and stiffer and you will loose less power plus they look nicer
    I am dyslexic so bear with my posts.... [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  4. #4
    Senior Member bike manhattan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    Posts
    169
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by yummygooey View Post
    You'll notice an upgraded crankset more than you noticed your seatpost.
    The seat post was for aesthetic reasons. Wanted silver instead of black. I just got a cheap one that was silver...

    How is the Sugino 75? Already got my gear ratio locked in at 17/48 after riding for years at 16/48. I like bigger ratios.
    Left NYC and moved back to Philly, now i am stuck with an ironic user name

  5. #5
    Elitist carleton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    10,713
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    It depends on how big and/or strong you are. If you are a relatively small guy then you may not stress/flex your cranks and chainring that much. But, a strong normal sized guy or a big guy in general will flex some stuff.

    Also, some higher quality parts may not perform better. I mean, how much does a stem or seatpost perform? But, they may be lighter and/or resist wear, damage, or breakage more. Micro-adjust seatposts are awesome for getting the saddle angle just right. Keeps "the boys" happy.

    But, if you aren't stressing your bike like doing full on accelerations or powering up hills, then you may not push your current gear past it's limits.

    On the other hand, if it makes you happy and makes you love your bike a little more, then those are good reasons to buy stuff.

    The top upgrades that people seem to notice the most involve where you contact the bike and where the bike contacts the road. Those being saddle, bars, bar tape, pedals/shoes, and tires. Spend a little extra to get some higher quality in those areas and you will improve your ride.

  6. #6
    i smell bacon yummygooey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    My Bikes
    GT Edge Ti, Spooky Skeletor, Soma Grand Randonneur, TET Track, Trek 6500 MTB
    Posts
    5,598
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Compared to stock cranks, I noticed an increase in stiffness in both Omniums and Sugino 75s. Honestly, though, they are both overkill for me. They're nice to have, but I'm a 145 lb guy with no major hills to climb. I got both my Omniums and Suginos for really great deals, so even though I'm a financially unstable college student, I felt that I could justify them just for the amount of time I spend riding my bike(s). I like riding nicer cranks, I do feel a difference between nicer cranks and cheap cranks, and they seem to make riding more pleasurable.

    That being said, I agree with carleton in the sense that I feel like the most important upgrades I've made to my bikes have been the saddles, pedals, and bars.
    // yummygooey

  7. #7
    GONE~
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    6,745
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I agree with what have been said but I would also like to add a little something. If the stock chainring is relatively eccentric, and you get a lot of chain tension variation, then a new, higher quality chainring would definitely help with that.

  8. #8
    King of the Hipsters
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Bend, Oregon
    My Bikes
    Bianchi Pista
    Posts
    2,125
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Upgrades generally represent incremental improvements rather than dramatic improvements.

    If you had a time machine and could compare a stock factory complete bike to a completely upgraded bike, with just the original frame, you'd notice a significant improvement in riding pleasure, ease, and control.

    However, at each step of the upgrades, you would notice only small and subtle improvements.

    The most significant improvements come with wheels and tires and with cranksets; and, however, even these "signigicant" improvements do not match the money spent to acheive them.

    A Sugino 75 crankset, which includes the gorgeous Sugino 75 chainring, costs $360.

    Will you notice an improvement?

    Yes.

    A $360 improvement?

    No.

    Worth it?

    Definitely.

    Oh, and regarding "stifness:" your frame has so much flex the so-called stiffness of the crank has less meaning than does the crankset's roundness, trueness and proper bottom bracket system.

  9. #9
    Veteran Mother****er Scrodzilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    My Bikes
    EAI Bare Knuckle / Leader 725 / 1975 Raleigh Professional Track
    Posts
    23,365
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    im, hungary
    Posts
    1,984
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    255 on bikeisland, that is + 35$ protype bb. but i agree with ken otherwise, the incremental improvement part.

  11. #11
    King of the Hipsters
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Bend, Oregon
    My Bikes
    Bianchi Pista
    Posts
    2,125
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Who pooped on whose party, and in what manner?

  12. #12
    Veteran Mother****er Scrodzilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    My Bikes
    EAI Bare Knuckle / Leader 725 / 1975 Raleigh Professional Track
    Posts
    23,365
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Tongue-in-cheek. I was implying that logic rains on the parade of upgrading "just because".

  13. #13
    King of the Hipsters
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Bend, Oregon
    My Bikes
    Bianchi Pista
    Posts
    2,125
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Scrodzilla wrote, "logic rains on the parade of upgrading."

    It costs a lot to upgrade, and, as Scrodzilla implies, it doesn't make much sense.

    When one looks at the price of an entire brand new automobile, one has to wonder why simple bike parts cost so much.

    Automobile manufacturers do NOT have the advantage of scale of production, since, in reality, bicycle parts manufacturers produce many more parts than do automobile manufacturers (more bikes in the world than cars).

    I try to imagine an experiment where people ride two bikes: 1) a stock factory complete bike and 2) a thoroughly upgraded bike on the same frame.

    If you could somehow keep the riders from looking at the bike, how much difference would they feel between the two bikes?

    And, would different riders have a different experience, like, would long-time riders of fixed gear bikes feel more difference than new or uncommitted fixed gear riders.

    After six years of study and saving up my money, I now have my dream bike.

    Riding it seems almost a religious experience.

    However, how much of the "religious experience" exists only in my mind?

    If I could ride my original 2005 Bianchi Pista and my current Super Bike back to back, with out knowing which bike I rode, would I feel a real difference?

    I THINK I'd notice a big difference.

    However, I don't think the ride difference would match cost difference between the two bikes.

    But then I find myself thinking about a bike as an art object.

    When I got my Sugino 75 crank and chain ring, I just sat and looked at them for an hour.

    The chain ring itself belongs in an art museum.

    Or, consider watches.

    Does a Rolex GMT Master II keep better time than a plastic department store digital watch?

    No.

    However, for some watch owners, the Rolex give more satisfaction; and, for others, the plastic department store digital watch gives more satisfaction.

    For myself, I feel like I get a good return on money spent on wheels, tires, cranks, chain rings and cogs.

    The rest of the bike doesn't seem to matter too much, as long as the bike fits.

    And, all that said, I had a lot of fun on my amazingly cheap Bianchi Pista.

  14. #14
    Senior Member vw addict's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    East coast
    My Bikes
    Specialized Tarmac Expert, Cannondale R700, Specialized Langster, Iron Horse Hollowpoint Team, Schwinn Homegrown
    Posts
    2,678
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Ken Cox View Post
    The chain ring itself belongs in an art museum.
    don't you think that is going a little far? It looks like a chain ring to me. A lot of things make sense to upgrade on a bike, but those things come with a price. Is the price "worth" the upgrade in performance? Probably not. Time spent strengthening your heart/lungs/legs will make your bike perform so much better, and its essentially free.
    Quote Originally Posted by cc700 View Post
    there is a difference though because that extra weight will directly correlate with how many chicks huff your dongus.

  15. #15
    Veteran Mother****er Scrodzilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    My Bikes
    EAI Bare Knuckle / Leader 725 / 1975 Raleigh Professional Track
    Posts
    23,365
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Ken - I never implied that upgrading doesn't make sense. There are plenty of situations where upgrading is perfectly necessary and/or justifiable. However, upgrading a component simply because it's the last stock part on your bike seems a little silly.

    I'm with you in thinking that a lot of how our bikes feel to us is in our heads. When my bike is set up exactly how I want it - even when it comes down to aesthetics - it just "feels" better. If I rode it without ever seeing it or knowing what kind of components are actually on it, as you suggest, who knows?

    Also, we're all partial to different things. When I look at and ride my Leader 722, I think "this bike is exactly how I want it and wouldn't change a thing". But, someone else viewing a picture of it - who has never ridden it - could easily say "you need a different stem" or "lose the risers and get some road drops". It's all subjective.
    Last edited by Scrodzilla; 03-13-11 at 11:09 AM.

  16. #16
    Fueled by Tigers Blood avner's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Echo Park, California
    Posts
    1,498
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I gotta say, i notice a significant difference between my 725 and Jamis in terms of flex and power transfer. But I'm not a small guy, and at this point in the game I'd like to think my legs are decently strong too, other then the Rando feeling like I'm dragging a dead poodle the Sugino 75's feel much better (5mm shorter then my RPM Vero's) Spinning feels better, I can drop down further. I'm 6'2 and 210 on a bad day, around 190 on a good day. I can flex ****, and I climb a lot.
    Quote Originally Posted by Leukybear View Post
    Genius.
    Quote Originally Posted by xkillemallx16 View Post
    Save your dignity and go back to hopping curbs on your langster.
    Quote Originally Posted by jdgesus View Post
    only thing cars are good for is hitting me

  17. #17
    i smell bacon yummygooey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    My Bikes
    GT Edge Ti, Spooky Skeletor, Soma Grand Randonneur, TET Track, Trek 6500 MTB
    Posts
    5,598
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Ken Cox View Post
    When I got my Sugino 75 crank and chain ring, I just sat and looked at them for an hour.
    Haha, I've done this before.
    // yummygooey

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •