Photographers??
#126
Elitist
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times
in
77 Posts
Haha! Power chords are awesome and so are depth of field and monochrome. But, they should be mistaken for technical skill or composition.
Some people think that any photo converted to black & white is "deep". There are 10 variables that go into making a good photo, depth of field and color (or lack thereof) are only 2 of them.
Some people think that any photo converted to black & white is "deep". There are 10 variables that go into making a good photo, depth of field and color (or lack thereof) are only 2 of them.
#127
Painfully average.
Holy shizasdaf. The Canon G12 is expensive! (Somewhat), (Actually, I don't even know why I'm surprised. I'm really not.).. (Maybe I just wasn't ready for it. Yeah.. That's it.)
#129
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wadsworth, IL
Posts: 466
Bikes: Motobecane Vent Noir, Specialized Crux, Specialized Carve
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Btw, you guys should check out my flickr!
https://www.flickr.com/thisisbenji
#130
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wadsworth, IL
Posts: 466
Bikes: Motobecane Vent Noir, Specialized Crux, Specialized Carve
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I personally hate when people take digital photos and turn them into black and whites. I can always tell right away. I'v done some experimenting with the zone system on my film camera and really liked the results but can't seem to reproduce them on the digital camera no matter how hard I try.
#131
Gilmatic Cee Allah
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: BKNY
Posts: 119
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I personally hate when people take digital photos and turn them into black and whites. I can always tell right away. I'v done some experimenting with the zone system on my film camera and really liked the results but can't seem to reproduce them on the digital camera no matter how hard I try.
Watch this video to learn more why a lot of photographers prefer monochrome.
https://www.musarium.com/stories/viet.../color-bw.html
#132
Elitist
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times
in
77 Posts
I personally hate when people take digital photos and turn them into black and whites. I can always tell right away. I'v done some experimenting with the zone system on my film camera and really liked the results but can't seem to reproduce them on the digital camera no matter how hard I try.
With digital, your "film" is directly tied to the camera that you buy. So, the key is to buy a nicer camera that comes with a nicer sensor (film) then you will get much nicer digital noise (grain).
The best film-like grain that I've ever seen from a digital camera is from my Ricoh GR-D.
It had it's flaws (like poor flash metering), but the sensor was amazing.
#133
Painfully average.
I'd like the option of 720p video also. The money isn't an issue, I like a fine camera and I'll take your word for it if you recommended the G12.
I'm sorry to bother you with all these newb questions, but one more? Can you compare the G12 with the Nikon P7000? Both had wide-angle lenses like you recommended.
I'm sorry to bother you with all these newb questions, but one more? Can you compare the G12 with the Nikon P7000? Both had wide-angle lenses like you recommended.
#134
Elitist
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times
in
77 Posts
I'd like the option of 720p video also. The money isn't an issue, I like a fine camera and I'll take your word for it if you recommended the G12.
I'm sorry to bother you with all these newb questions, but one more? Can you compare the G12 with the Nikon P7000? Both had wide-angle lenses like you recommended.
I'm sorry to bother you with all these newb questions, but one more? Can you compare the G12 with the Nikon P7000? Both had wide-angle lenses like you recommended.
#135
Gilmatic Cee Allah
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: BKNY
Posts: 119
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'd like the option of 720p video also. The money isn't an issue, I like a fine camera and I'll take your word for it if you recommended the G12.
I'm sorry to bother you with all these newb questions, but one more? Can you compare the G12 with the Nikon P7000? Both had wide-angle lenses like you recommended.
I'm sorry to bother you with all these newb questions, but one more? Can you compare the G12 with the Nikon P7000? Both had wide-angle lenses like you recommended.
Both are great cameras with pretty fast lenses (f/2.0).
Cliffnotes:
LX5 has a great video function and is faster throughout the zoom range. Has a lot of cool built in functions to play around with.
S95 pictures look better generally SOOC and is slightly cleaner at higher ISO's. It's also pocketable and has a built in lens cap. It has a longer range than the LX5.
With that being said, if I had to make a choice right now for myself. I'd get the Sony Nex-5 with an adapter with the Panasonic pancake lens or the Fuji X100 (probably this one if I could afford it).
#136
Elitist
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times
in
77 Posts
Those cameras sound awesome.
The smaller the better, that way you will have it with you more often. One of the things I didn't like about the Canon G10 was that it was bulky. Lots of great features, but tough to put in pants pocket. Jacket yes, pants no. It's a great learning tool, though because it has manual mode.
This is why I liked the Ricoh GR. It easily fit in jeans.
The smaller the better, that way you will have it with you more often. One of the things I didn't like about the Canon G10 was that it was bulky. Lots of great features, but tough to put in pants pocket. Jacket yes, pants no. It's a great learning tool, though because it has manual mode.
This is why I liked the Ricoh GR. It easily fit in jeans.
#137
Banana-tastic!
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,969
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#138
Gilmatic Cee Allah
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: BKNY
Posts: 119
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Those cameras sound awesome.
The smaller the better, that way you will have it with you more often. One of the things I didn't like about the Canon G10 was that it was bulky. Lots of great features, but tough to put in pants pocket. Jacket yes, pants no. It's a great learning tool, though because it has manual mode.
This is why I liked the Ricoh GR. It easily fit in jeans.
The smaller the better, that way you will have it with you more often. One of the things I didn't like about the Canon G10 was that it was bulky. Lots of great features, but tough to put in pants pocket. Jacket yes, pants no. It's a great learning tool, though because it has manual mode.
This is why I liked the Ricoh GR. It easily fit in jeans.
#139
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 418
Bikes: Trek Madone, Araya commute
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
You have to imagine the photo in your head then use whatever camera you have to make it happen. There are MILLIONS of hacks with $10K worth of camera gear, lights, computers, and software that couldn't shoot their way out of a wet paper bag.
Understanding light and composition will.
don't get caught up in megapixels.
Canon G12.
Understanding light and composition will.
don't get caught up in megapixels.
Canon G12.
Second, I'd like to 'second' what Carleton's entire post said, but i decided to cut out and bold some things that i read and said , "Couldn't have said it better myself."
Great bit of info Carleton, I 100% agree! I have a friend who shoots a 7D with a 24-70 f/2.8, 70-200f/2.8, and 16-35f/2.8. All "L" glass, with a very great crop sensor body. The quality of his photos do not match mine taken with an iPhone 3G. I shoot my 50D, a very old Tamron 17-50, and the 50 f/1.8 almost 100% of the time. Im happy with most of the images I make. I do not need my friends $5000 in gear. The fact that I can execute what's I see in my head into a photograph is all i care about. *Although some L glass and a 5dmkII wouldn't be too horrible...haha
Anywho, nice bit of info indeed!
.Chris
#140
Ths Hipstr Kills Masheenz
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: seattle
Posts: 8,542
Bikes: tirove
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
i had a canon G11, my favorite thing about it was its high resale value.
****ing hated that camera. total bull****. nothing compared to even the most entriest of dslr's.
****ing hated that camera. total bull****. nothing compared to even the most entriest of dslr's.
#141
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 418
Bikes: Trek Madone, Araya commute
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
What did you not like about it?
Orrrrr....are you one of those Nikon guys?
.Chris
#142
Ths Hipstr Kills Masheenz
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: seattle
Posts: 8,542
Bikes: tirove
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
the shutter lag is a total random value depending on the complexity of the scene and light conditions. you can't rely on it taking the picture when you want it to take the picture... and at BEST it will still be a quarter-to-half second of waiting before it gets focus.
the built in flash is **** and the external flash makes it as big as an slr.
the autofocus is slow for most things and the manual focus is a joke.
but the big thing was the shutter lag. it was usually anywhere from .75" to 1.5" and that's just an eternity for me, even if i'm shooting a still scene.
take that general slow operation, stacked with the limited usability of its modes(lowlight is crap compared to a 50d with a 1.8 50mm, marginally better than any current gen point and shoot, the macro is nice but only in bright conditions, and the wide angle isn't really that wide), and you get a camera that's great if you don't have high expectations for your photos, and extremely frustrating if you do. even if you're used to a ****ty slr, you'll be used to better pictures than the g11.
i am one of those nikon guys, but you knew that.
and what really hurt is that i sold my D50, which i loved, for the G11 and used a big gift certificate for it, too. the gift certificate could have gotten me a new monitor, which i desperately need and would have improved my photography way more than a compact camera ever could.
i love nice canons, but it wasn't just the controls of the G11 or the 'canon-ness' of it, it was the performance(or lacking performance) of it. i got some great shots out of the camera but i feel like it took them all on its own and i hated it for it.
that and its too big to comfortably fit in a pocket, so at that point why not just take your slr? especially when you consider the price.
i think it's a great camera compared to any other point and shoot, don't get me wrong... but it's absolute **** compared to a comparably priced slr, even from canon.
the built in flash is **** and the external flash makes it as big as an slr.
the autofocus is slow for most things and the manual focus is a joke.
but the big thing was the shutter lag. it was usually anywhere from .75" to 1.5" and that's just an eternity for me, even if i'm shooting a still scene.
take that general slow operation, stacked with the limited usability of its modes(lowlight is crap compared to a 50d with a 1.8 50mm, marginally better than any current gen point and shoot, the macro is nice but only in bright conditions, and the wide angle isn't really that wide), and you get a camera that's great if you don't have high expectations for your photos, and extremely frustrating if you do. even if you're used to a ****ty slr, you'll be used to better pictures than the g11.
i am one of those nikon guys, but you knew that.
and what really hurt is that i sold my D50, which i loved, for the G11 and used a big gift certificate for it, too. the gift certificate could have gotten me a new monitor, which i desperately need and would have improved my photography way more than a compact camera ever could.
i love nice canons, but it wasn't just the controls of the G11 or the 'canon-ness' of it, it was the performance(or lacking performance) of it. i got some great shots out of the camera but i feel like it took them all on its own and i hated it for it.
that and its too big to comfortably fit in a pocket, so at that point why not just take your slr? especially when you consider the price.
i think it's a great camera compared to any other point and shoot, don't get me wrong... but it's absolute **** compared to a comparably priced slr, even from canon.
Last edited by cc700; 04-13-11 at 11:56 PM.
#143
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 418
Bikes: Trek Madone, Araya commute
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks for the info man! Like you mentioned at the end, they are rather big. The whole point for me to get a nicer p/s was to reduce me carrying a bulky slr. Guess i'll have to get my hands dirty and go to a shop and try a bunch out!
and yes...i did know you where one of those 'nikon guys'...haha
.Chris
and yes...i did know you where one of those 'nikon guys'...haha
.Chris
#144
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: NYC
Posts: 189
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I hear similarly good things about the Panasonic LX-3 but it's like 20-60mm or something shortish like that.
Keep in mind that any point and shoot is going to be inferior (technically speaking) to the vast majority of SLRs. They're just not as quick, not as clean, noisier, and all-around less versatile than an SLR. Their principal virtue is that they can go where SLR's don't, and while that's no small virtue, you just have to be aware of their limitations.
#145
Ths Hipstr Kills Masheenz
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: seattle
Posts: 8,542
Bikes: tirove
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
honestly i just hate the canon control dial. that ****ing pinwheel ruins me on the whole brand.
D700 with tamron "focus hunter" 70-200:
Canon "i'll take the picture eventually" G11:
not saying i can't do better or worse with either, but in all they each take good pictures, but the g11 sucks to use if you are used to actually operating a camera.
D700 with tamron "focus hunter" 70-200:
Canon "i'll take the picture eventually" G11:
not saying i can't do better or worse with either, but in all they each take good pictures, but the g11 sucks to use if you are used to actually operating a camera.
#146
Elitist
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times
in
77 Posts
the shutter lag is a total random value depending on the complexity of the scene and light conditions. you can't rely on it taking the picture when you want it to take the picture... and at BEST it will still be a quarter-to-half second of waiting before it gets focus.
the built in flash is **** and the external flash makes it as big as an slr.
the autofocus is slow for most things and the manual focus is a joke.
but the big thing was the shutter lag. it was usually anywhere from .75" to 1.5" and that's just an eternity for me, even if i'm shooting a still scene.
take that general slow operation, stacked with the limited usability of its modes(lowlight is crap compared to a 50d with a 1.8 50mm, marginally better than any current gen point and shoot, the macro is nice but only in bright conditions, and the wide angle isn't really that wide), and you get a camera that's great if you don't have high expectations for your photos, and extremely frustrating if you do. even if you're used to a ****ty slr, you'll be used to better pictures than the g11.
i am one of those nikon guys, but you knew that.
and what really hurt is that i sold my D50, which i loved, for the G11 and used a big gift certificate for it, too. the gift certificate could have gotten me a new monitor, which i desperately need and would have improved my photography way more than a compact camera ever could.
i love nice canons, but it wasn't just the controls of the G11 or the 'canon-ness' of it, it was the performance(or lacking performance) of it. i got some great shots out of the camera but i feel like it took them all on its own and i hated it for it.
that and its too big to comfortably fit in a pocket, so at that point why not just take your slr? especially when you consider the price.
i think it's a great camera compared to any other point and shoot, don't get me wrong... but it's absolute **** compared to a comparably priced slr, even from canon.
the built in flash is **** and the external flash makes it as big as an slr.
the autofocus is slow for most things and the manual focus is a joke.
but the big thing was the shutter lag. it was usually anywhere from .75" to 1.5" and that's just an eternity for me, even if i'm shooting a still scene.
take that general slow operation, stacked with the limited usability of its modes(lowlight is crap compared to a 50d with a 1.8 50mm, marginally better than any current gen point and shoot, the macro is nice but only in bright conditions, and the wide angle isn't really that wide), and you get a camera that's great if you don't have high expectations for your photos, and extremely frustrating if you do. even if you're used to a ****ty slr, you'll be used to better pictures than the g11.
i am one of those nikon guys, but you knew that.
and what really hurt is that i sold my D50, which i loved, for the G11 and used a big gift certificate for it, too. the gift certificate could have gotten me a new monitor, which i desperately need and would have improved my photography way more than a compact camera ever could.
i love nice canons, but it wasn't just the controls of the G11 or the 'canon-ness' of it, it was the performance(or lacking performance) of it. i got some great shots out of the camera but i feel like it took them all on its own and i hated it for it.
that and its too big to comfortably fit in a pocket, so at that point why not just take your slr? especially when you consider the price.
i think it's a great camera compared to any other point and shoot, don't get me wrong... but it's absolute **** compared to a comparably priced slr, even from canon.
I never had any shutter lag issues. You probably didn't do something right.
For example, at one of my son's baseball games, I wanted to know what grip he was pitching with...so I used my Canon G10 to find out:
(this is a tight crop of a much wider photo. Enlarged to show the pitching grip.)
#147
Ths Hipstr Kills Masheenz
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: seattle
Posts: 8,542
Bikes: tirove
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
if you read what i wrote, i was NOT blaming my tools. I was saying i didn't like how they worked. i didn't expect the camera to do all the work for me, and i didn't blame it when i didn't do the work for it; i just hated having to guess at how much i had to anticipate the ****ing shutter lag.
sure, i could turn i.s. off, zoom in, manually focus and blast the iso high so i can use a fast shutter speed, and probably cut the shutter lag down to a predictable quarter of a second or so... but it's not a ****ing shutter and i still hate using it. not to mention i have to go through eight freaking menus to do that, or rely on some ridiculous preset or custom setting to cut down on shutter lag, and it will still be an unpredictable amount.
any shot i missed because i was using the G11 i missed because i wasn't doing it right. i never said anything to the contrary.
that said, any shot i missed with the G11 i missed because the G11 was in my bag, and i got the shot with my ****ing SLR.
the G11 is great if you CAN NOT use an SLR. like, if someone won't let you take their picture with an interchangable lens camera.
doesn't mean i should love my crayola crayons and multi-use printer paper when i'd much prefer to use conte crayons on ****ing strathmore.
a craftsman doesn't blame his tools... he knows them and loves them. he chooses them.
also, your son is a total badass and that's an awesome crop
sure, i could turn i.s. off, zoom in, manually focus and blast the iso high so i can use a fast shutter speed, and probably cut the shutter lag down to a predictable quarter of a second or so... but it's not a ****ing shutter and i still hate using it. not to mention i have to go through eight freaking menus to do that, or rely on some ridiculous preset or custom setting to cut down on shutter lag, and it will still be an unpredictable amount.
any shot i missed because i was using the G11 i missed because i wasn't doing it right. i never said anything to the contrary.
that said, any shot i missed with the G11 i missed because the G11 was in my bag, and i got the shot with my ****ing SLR.
the G11 is great if you CAN NOT use an SLR. like, if someone won't let you take their picture with an interchangable lens camera.
doesn't mean i should love my crayola crayons and multi-use printer paper when i'd much prefer to use conte crayons on ****ing strathmore.
a craftsman doesn't blame his tools... he knows them and loves them. he chooses them.
also, your son is a total badass and that's an awesome crop
Last edited by cc700; 04-14-11 at 12:36 AM.
#148
Banana-tastic!
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,969
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#149
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Ottawa, ON / Uralsk, West-Kazakhstan
Posts: 20
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Hey, guys!
I am an amateur photographer, also volunteer for a community newspaper "The Leveller"
Here are some of my works:
Uralsk, West Kazakhstan
Ottawa, Ontario
Almaty, Kazakhstan
Moscow, Russia
I am an amateur photographer, also volunteer for a community newspaper "The Leveller"
Here are some of my works:
Uralsk, West Kazakhstan
Ottawa, Ontario
Almaty, Kazakhstan
Moscow, Russia