Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
Reload this Page >

Tire width proportioned to rider weight

Search
Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

Tire width proportioned to rider weight

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-20-11, 10:04 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 213

Bikes: 2009 SE Draft SS, 2001 Trek 1000 Alpha roadie, 1991 Diamondback mtb & 1976 KHS Gran Sport mixte

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Tire width proportioned to rider weight

Couldn't even try searching this, it's kind of "hard" to look this up..but......


I weigh 180-190#, and have been running 700x23 since I started riding newer bikes... the amount of deflection when I ride kinda scares me, so would going to 25 or 28 make any difference? I know they'd be a bit slower due to increased contact w/ the road....unless I"m wrong there too
mestizoracer310 is offline  
Old 05-20-11, 10:06 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
zonatandem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 11,016

Bikes: Custom Zona c/f tandem + Scott Plasma single

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 77 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 19 Times in 11 Posts
Pump 'em up another 10 lbs . . .
zonatandem is offline  
Old 05-20-11, 10:13 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,014
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
How much pressure are you running?

Either get higher pressure tires for less deflection or get larger tires.

I switched from a 23 to a 28 in the back (and inflate the 28 to about 120 psi vs 145 for the 23) I honestly can't tell a difference at all.

I'm sure someone will say "If you're not getting pinch flats, there's nothing to worry about." which is probs true.
hamish5178 is offline  
Old 05-20-11, 10:13 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 213

Bikes: 2009 SE Draft SS, 2001 Trek 1000 Alpha roadie, 1991 Diamondback mtb & 1976 KHS Gran Sport mixte

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I actually have been....more specifically 120 in the front and 130 in the rear. This is with wire-beaded Gatorskins...
mestizoracer310 is offline  
Old 05-20-11, 10:17 PM
  #5  
Painfully average.
 
calv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,304

Bikes: Caad10 / All-City SP

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
At your weight, I believe you'll be better off with 28's
calv is offline  
Old 05-20-11, 11:06 PM
  #6  
Goes to 11.
 
striknein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Wichita, KS, USA
Posts: 2,547

Bikes: 2015 Soma Double Cross

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
At 245 lbs., I've been running 700x23 tires for 8 months now. The ride is terribly harsh and I have to be very careful to make sure my tires are inflated before every ride, but my rims have stayed straight and true. I've only ever had to worry about deflection when hitting a crack or pothole, but I know how to "get light".

However, after finally finding a set of 28s locally, I can say the difference in ride quality is night and day.
striknein is offline  
Old 05-21-11, 01:54 AM
  #7  
I just wanna ride
 
stryper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Chico Califo
Posts: 1,155

Bikes: 2013 BMC Impec

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
The actual contact patch on a 25 is probably smaller for you than a 23 would be because of your size. I read a great article about it last year some time that gave great reasons for why this worked. Something to do with your weight on a smaller tire is pushing the tire flat long ways more than the added contact patch of a wider tire which will be conpressed less because of the greater air volume.
stryper is offline  
Old 05-22-11, 06:53 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 213

Bikes: 2009 SE Draft SS, 2001 Trek 1000 Alpha roadie, 1991 Diamondback mtb & 1976 KHS Gran Sport mixte

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Ok, so 2 votes for 28s and one for staying w/ 23s....

stryper, is that article online somewhere?
mestizoracer310 is offline  
Old 05-22-11, 07:01 PM
  #9  
Fresh Garbage
 
hairnet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 13,190

Bikes: N+1

Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 352 Post(s)
Liked 27 Times in 18 Posts
Originally Posted by mestizoracer310
I actually have been....more specifically 120 in the front and 130 in the rear. This is with wire-beaded Gatorskins...
That's over inflating; I'm 200 and I have never gone over 120 and hardly ever get pinch flats with 23s. You need to steer around holes/cracks, learn to bunny hop, or simply get your ass off the saddle and let the legs absorb the impact. I know an older more experienced cyclist, who is also heavy, and he rides 23s at even lower pressures because he can effectively avoid pinch flats.

That said, I have been using wide tires lately (28 and 35mm) and I don't see myself going back unless the frame limits me.

tandems with 23s come to mind

Last edited by hairnet; 05-22-11 at 07:10 PM.
hairnet is offline  
Old 05-22-11, 07:17 PM
  #10  
Veteran Racer
 
TejanoTrackie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Ciudad de Vacas, Tejas
Posts: 11,757

Bikes: 32 frames + 80 wheels

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1331 Post(s)
Liked 764 Times in 431 Posts
Use the following formulas to determine proper tire pressure as a function of rider weight and tire section:

Tire Width=20: Pressure(psi) = (0.33 * Rider Weight in lbs) + 63.33
Tire Width=23: Pressure(psi) = (0.33 * Rider Weight in lbs) + 53.33
Tire Width=25: Pressure(psi) = (0.33 * Rider Weight in lbs) + 43.33
Tire Width=28: Pressure(psi) = (0.33 * Rider Weight in lbs) + 33.33
Tire Width=32: Pressure(psi) = (0.17 * Rider Weight in lbs) + 41.67
Tire Width=37: Pressure(psi) = (0.17 * Rider Weight in lbs) + 26.67
Front Pressure = .9*Rear Pressure

For example, the OP weighs 185 lbs and uses 23mm wide tires, so Rear Tire Pressure = 0.33 x 185 + 53.33 = 114 psi. Front Tire Pressure = 0.9 x 114 = 103 psi.
__________________
What, Me Worry? - Alfred E. Neuman

Originally Posted by Dcv
I'd like to think i have as much money as brains.
I see the light at the end of the tunnel, but the tunnel keeps getting longer - me
TejanoTrackie is offline  
Old 05-22-11, 07:19 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
mikeetow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Hermosa Beach, CA
Posts: 388
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by calv
At your weight, I believe you'll be better off with 28's
why
mikeetow is offline  
Old 05-22-11, 07:28 PM
  #12  
Veteran Racer
 
TejanoTrackie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Ciudad de Vacas, Tejas
Posts: 11,757

Bikes: 32 frames + 80 wheels

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1331 Post(s)
Liked 764 Times in 431 Posts
Originally Posted by mestizoracer310
I actually have been....more specifically 120 in the front and 130 in the rear. This is with wire-beaded Gatorskins...
That is unnecessarily high. See my post #10.
__________________
What, Me Worry? - Alfred E. Neuman

Originally Posted by Dcv
I'd like to think i have as much money as brains.
I see the light at the end of the tunnel, but the tunnel keeps getting longer - me
TejanoTrackie is offline  
Old 05-22-11, 07:36 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
DGozinya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 373
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Just get 28s and don't think "oh my god, I'm running big fat tires..." They feel SO much better. Just do it.
DGozinya is offline  
Old 05-22-11, 07:58 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
iBgearLess's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 190

Bikes: Surly Steamroller

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I went from 32c vitt rando's on my steamroller to 35c schwalbe delta cruisers and the 35's actually feel faster becuase they absorb the road abuse so much better. I am 250lbs and 6'1" by the way. On my Big Block I run 28c randos and they have been fine so far.
iBgearLess is offline  
Old 05-22-11, 08:05 PM
  #15  
coasterbrakelockup
 
lz4005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: parts unknown
Posts: 824

Bikes: surly steamroller w/coaster brake, electra single speed cruiser, specialized rockhopper commuter, no-name single speed folder, 700c ultimate wheel, 24" unicycle, specialized bmx lsd, single seat single speed huffy tandem, pink upsidedown parade bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I weigh about the same as OP. 28's all day.
lz4005 is offline  
Old 05-22-11, 09:24 PM
  #16  
Painfully average.
 
calv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,304

Bikes: Caad10 / All-City SP

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by mikeetow
why
I think TT said something about depending on your weight, you may have less rolling resistance with a bigger tire.. I think he said people around 160 should be on 25's so I just assumed at 185 a 28 would work good.
calv is offline  
Old 05-22-11, 09:56 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 947

Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate 2006, Litespeed Pisgah , Specialized Roubaix 2008, Trek Madone 2011

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Check out yer weight distribution and use the Berto chart.

https://www.livestrong.com/article/37...tion-pressure/
jimblairo is offline  
Old 05-22-11, 11:11 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 213

Bikes: 2009 SE Draft SS, 2001 Trek 1000 Alpha roadie, 1991 Diamondback mtb & 1976 KHS Gran Sport mixte

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Tejano, do I need to recalculate for a given load every time I carry stuff (other than myself)...?? When I commute to work I sometimes bring a 4# netbook, sometimes my lunch and drinks for at work...
mestizoracer310 is offline  
Old 05-23-11, 04:09 AM
  #19  
Paste Taster
 
Retem's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 4,392

Bikes: , Jury Bike, Moto Outcast 29, Spicer standard track frame and spicer custom steel sprint frame.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TejanoTrackie
Use the following formulas to determine proper tire pressure as a function of rider weight and tire section:

Tire Width=20: Pressure(psi) = (0.33 * Rider Weight in lbs) + 63.33
Tire Width=23: Pressure(psi) = (0.33 * Rider Weight in lbs) + 53.33
Tire Width=25: Pressure(psi) = (0.33 * Rider Weight in lbs) + 43.33
Tire Width=28: Pressure(psi) = (0.33 * Rider Weight in lbs) + 33.33
Tire Width=32: Pressure(psi) = (0.17 * Rider Weight in lbs) + 41.67
Tire Width=37: Pressure(psi) = (0.17 * Rider Weight in lbs) + 26.67
Front Pressure = .9*Rear Pressure

For example, the OP weighs 185 lbs and uses 23mm wide tires, so Rear Tire Pressure = 0.33 x 185 + 53.33 = 114 psi. Front Tire Pressure = 0.9 x 114 = 103 psi.
dude gas it right I am a clydesdale and run 23s with no problems at all
Retem is offline  
Old 05-23-11, 06:15 AM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 3,691

Bikes: Too many bikes, too little time to ride

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 430 Post(s)
Liked 460 Times in 318 Posts
I'm in the 180s myself and have ridden tires ranging from 23-32. I still rock race tires (23) on my go-fast road bikes (and pinch flats are never a problem as long as I inflate my tires to proper pressure) but for casual riding/commuting I prefer something wider. I find 25s and 28s to be good compromises between speed and comfort but lately I've been riding 32s on my Bianchi San Jose and I love the comfort and ability to ride over anything (well, almost).
tFUnK is online now  
Old 05-23-11, 07:07 AM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,301
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 1 Post
Tejano, where is that formula from?

I've been a low-pressure kind of guy for a while (most are surprised just how low), and your math is pretty close to my practice. there are all kinds of arguments for it.

OP, you're absolutely fine on 25c (@ maybe 95/105?)...but that's no reason not to run 28c, if that's what you like.
dookie is offline  
Old 05-23-11, 07:21 AM
  #22  
Veteran Racer
 
TejanoTrackie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Ciudad de Vacas, Tejas
Posts: 11,757

Bikes: 32 frames + 80 wheels

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1331 Post(s)
Liked 764 Times in 431 Posts
Originally Posted by dookie
Tejano, where is that formula from?
I don't remember, but another member here originally posted it. I've been using it for all my non-competitive road riding on clincher tires ranging from 23mm to 37mm, and it seems to work really well. Higher pressures just make the tires ride like rocks w/o any noticeable gains in performance or flat resistance. Also, cornering traction in the rain is reduced significantly at higher pressures.
__________________
What, Me Worry? - Alfred E. Neuman

Originally Posted by Dcv
I'd like to think i have as much money as brains.
I see the light at the end of the tunnel, but the tunnel keeps getting longer - me
TejanoTrackie is offline  
Old 05-23-11, 09:21 AM
  #23  
Fresh Garbage
 
hairnet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 13,190

Bikes: N+1

Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 352 Post(s)
Liked 27 Times in 18 Posts
Originally Posted by dookie
where is that formula from?
Psimet's Tip of the Day
hairnet is offline  
Old 06-04-11, 09:35 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 213

Bikes: 2009 SE Draft SS, 2001 Trek 1000 Alpha roadie, 1991 Diamondback mtb & 1976 KHS Gran Sport mixte

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Tejano, what about mismatched tire widths, say a 23 in front and a 25 out back or even vice versa?
mestizoracer310 is offline  
Old 06-04-11, 09:39 PM
  #25  
Fresh Garbage
 
hairnet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 13,190

Bikes: N+1

Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 352 Post(s)
Liked 27 Times in 18 Posts
wider in front will be more cushiony
hairnet is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.