Frame Sizing for Single Speed - Smaller or Larger?
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 9
Bikes: 2011 Globe Roll 1, 1970s Motobecane Touring Bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Frame Sizing for Single Speed - Smaller or Larger?
I know, I know - another "sizing" question. But hear me out.
I'm about 6'1" with a 32" inseam. I'm on the market for a light single speed for commuting and bombing around town.
I'm pretty smitten with a gloss black 2011 Globe Roll 1 at my LBS. The price is right, the location is convenient for service, and the bike feels and looks great.
The only question remaining is frame size. For some reason, Globe sizing jumps from a 58cm "L" to a 63cm "XL."
By all accounts I should fit anywhere from a 58 to a 60. I can ride either and they seem fine. Standover height on the 58 leaves me an inch give or take, while my junk rests on the frame for the 63.
I'm leaning toward going for the 58, just because it'll be lighter, more maneuverable, a bit more aggressive, and the seatpost won't be embarrassingly low.
Thoughts/opinions on going for either size? Thanks!
I'm about 6'1" with a 32" inseam. I'm on the market for a light single speed for commuting and bombing around town.
I'm pretty smitten with a gloss black 2011 Globe Roll 1 at my LBS. The price is right, the location is convenient for service, and the bike feels and looks great.
The only question remaining is frame size. For some reason, Globe sizing jumps from a 58cm "L" to a 63cm "XL."
By all accounts I should fit anywhere from a 58 to a 60. I can ride either and they seem fine. Standover height on the 58 leaves me an inch give or take, while my junk rests on the frame for the 63.
I'm leaning toward going for the 58, just because it'll be lighter, more maneuverable, a bit more aggressive, and the seatpost won't be embarrassingly low.
Thoughts/opinions on going for either size? Thanks!
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 53
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I find it easier to fit myself to a slightly smaller frame than to a larger one. I would go for the 58cm unless you feel very squashed relating to the TT length. A longer stem could remedy this but only to a certain extent.
#3
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 9
Bikes: 2011 Globe Roll 1, 1970s Motobecane Touring Bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
All this being said, it's not like I'm a pro racer here and need a custom-fitted frame. I just want to make sure it will still be comfortable for my 16k commute (round trip).
#4
モㄥ工匕モ 爪モ爪乃モ尺
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: LA San Gabriel, California
Posts: 2,135
Bikes: Custom frame
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
You should go to the bike shop and try out a variety of sizes, Some companies have a longer tt etc,
#5
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 9
Bikes: 2011 Globe Roll 1, 1970s Motobecane Touring Bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Probably just over-thinking it anyway, but with bikes it's hard not to.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: the LOU, Mo
Posts: 584
Bikes: Bianchi Nuevo Alloro, Cannondale ST400, Fuji Palisade, GT Timberline FS, Raleigh Technium 420, Schwinn Moab, Schwinn Passage, Schwinn Tempo, Specialized Sirrus Elite (aluminum), Specialized Sirrus Triple (steel), Trek 7.6, Viner Road Record
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Liked 65 Times
in
19 Posts
I rode smaller (53-54) for years , and just got into some larger frames (56-58) this past year.
I'm seriously contemplating moving back down. I often feel overstretched, even with seat and bar adjustments.
I'm seriously contemplating moving back down. I often feel overstretched, even with seat and bar adjustments.
#7
Elitist
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times
in
77 Posts
Go with the 58cm.
It's easier to make a small bike feel bigger than it is to make a large bike feel smaller.
BTW, I'm 6'1" with a 32" inseam and I'd never consider a bike over 58cm. You probably fit a 57/58. I had a 59cm Steamroller for like a week and hated the fit.
It's easier to make a small bike feel bigger than it is to make a large bike feel smaller.
BTW, I'm 6'1" with a 32" inseam and I'd never consider a bike over 58cm. You probably fit a 57/58. I had a 59cm Steamroller for like a week and hated the fit.
#8
Goes to 11.
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Wichita, KS, USA
Posts: 2,547
Bikes: 2015 Soma Double Cross
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The shop that has the bike you want to purchase won't let you borrow it for an hour?
Leave a credit card with them and go.
Leave a credit card with them and go.
#9
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 9
Bikes: 2011 Globe Roll 1, 1970s Motobecane Touring Bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks for the tips. I pulled the trigger and got the 58cm. Test drove it like four times this week. Feels good!
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,863
Bikes: too many of all kinds
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1147 Post(s)
Liked 415 Times
in
335 Posts
you just answered your own question. Do you want " lighter, more maneuverable, a bit more aggressive" or something more laid back and comfortable. Your choice.
#11
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 9
Bikes: 2011 Globe Roll 1, 1970s Motobecane Touring Bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
So... after riding the 58cm around for a bit and re-measuring myself I'm on the fence again. Without shoes I'm 6'1" 1/2 with about a 33" 1/2 inseam. So with shoes lets just say about 6'2" and 34" inseam. I also have pretty long arms. Fortunately my shop offers a 7 day exchange period, so I'm going back to try out the 63cm.
I could probably fit either with adjustments, but I'm showing at lot of seatpost on the 58cm and it feels a tad cramped. We'll see how the 63cm feels! Ah, indecision...
I could probably fit either with adjustments, but I'm showing at lot of seatpost on the 58cm and it feels a tad cramped. We'll see how the 63cm feels! Ah, indecision...
#12
Elitist
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times
in
77 Posts
So... after riding the 58cm around for a bit and re-measuring myself I'm on the fence again. Without shoes I'm 6'1" 1/2 with about a 33" 1/2 inseam. So with shoes lets just say about 6'2" and 34" inseam. I also have pretty long arms. Fortunately my shop offers a 7 day exchange period, so I'm going back to try out the 63cm.
I could probably fit either with adjustments, but I'm showing at lot of seatpost on the 58cm and it feels a tad cramped. We'll see how the 63cm feels! Ah, indecision...
I could probably fit either with adjustments, but I'm showing at lot of seatpost on the 58cm and it feels a tad cramped. We'll see how the 63cm feels! Ah, indecision...
I'm going out on a limb here, but there is NO WAY a 63cm bike will be appropriate for you.
Why not try a 63 cm road bike and you will see. 63cm is huge.
#13
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 9
Bikes: 2011 Globe Roll 1, 1970s Motobecane Touring Bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The ideal size for me is probably a 59-60cm, but we're talking about a few cm here and there which can definitely be managed with adjustment. I'm just one of those people who frets about unnecessary details.
Now... off to ride!
#14
Elitist
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times
in
77 Posts
Yeah, I just got back from trying it out again and I think you're right. The 63cm had me a bit stretched out and the top tube was definitely grazing the tender parts. I'm sticking with the 58cm. Just wanted to be sure.
The ideal size for me is probably a 59-60cm, but we're talking about a few cm here and there which can definitely be managed with adjustment. I'm just one of those people who frets about unnecessary details.
Now... off to ride!
The ideal size for me is probably a 59-60cm, but we're talking about a few cm here and there which can definitely be managed with adjustment. I'm just one of those people who frets about unnecessary details.
Now... off to ride!
I'm also 6'1" with a 32" inseam and I've been buying bikes for years. I can comfortably ride a 57 or 58cm bike. I would expect the same of you.
#16
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm looking at getting a Globe Roll II myself, and I'm probably going to go with the L (58). I did an in-store comfort test on the XL and it felt way too big. I'm 6'2", but my inseam is in the 30-31" range...and I like my bikes a little on the smaller side anyway. The XL made me feel uncomfortably high on the bike.
#17
バカスゴい
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Kobe, Japan
Posts: 256
Bikes: IRO Mark V Pro with FBM Sword fork, Ridley Oval,
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#18
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 9
Bikes: 2011 Globe Roll 1, 1970s Motobecane Touring Bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
58 sounds about right for your build. Try a lot of different bikes and take your time. I actually did end up going for the 63 - after re-measuring myself. I'm about 6'2" with a 35" inseam. That puts me around the 60-61cm area. The problem is Globe's sizing. They only have 4 frame sizes with a 5cm jump between each. Most companies keep it around 2-3cm in between sizes so it's easier to find your fit. I was right in between - the 58 felt too small; really twitchy and I had 90 per cent of the seatpost/stem showing. The 63 is just a shade too big, but I've still got an inch of clearance from the TT and a fist full of post. So it was closer, in the end. Next bike will probably be a 60-61 though.
#19
sɹɐʇsɟoןןnɟsʇıbɟɯo
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: seattle, too many links
Posts: 3,986
Bikes: fixed gear recumbent trike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
im 6'3" and i ride 58cm bikes.
im equal torso and legs, but monkey arms. everyone wins.
test ride the bike for an hour, no less.. u'll know after that
im equal torso and legs, but monkey arms. everyone wins.
test ride the bike for an hour, no less.. u'll know after that
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Daniil123
Fitting Your Bike
11
01-04-15 01:44 PM
junglemoth
Road Cycling
43
12-09-12 06:34 AM
MagicJade
Long Distance Competition/Ultracycling, Randonneuring and Endurance Cycling
13
05-12-11 03:40 PM