Advantages of Deep Vs?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 117
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Advantages of Deep Vs?
Eh. I've been accused of being a shill too many times because my posts tried to address all my questions at once. I assure you, i am NOT a shill. FFS go through all my posts if you want to make sure.
So let me ask you, what are the advantages of deep v rims?
I've only seen them on single speeds and fixies around town...
So let me ask you, what are the advantages of deep v rims?
I've only seen them on single speeds and fixies around town...
#2
Just smang it.
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Bellingham
Posts: 2,295
Bikes: Felt F1X, Trek 2300 Composite, Dawes Deadeye
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Street cred.
Theoretically they're stronger.
Also theoretically they're more aerodynamic because the smooth surface of the rim is more aero than spokes hence more rime + less spoke = more aero.
Disadvantages: Most of the advantages are negligible in practice and they tend to be much heavier than a box section or narrow rim of the same material
Theoretically they're stronger.
Also theoretically they're more aerodynamic because the smooth surface of the rim is more aero than spokes hence more rime + less spoke = more aero.
Disadvantages: Most of the advantages are negligible in practice and they tend to be much heavier than a box section or narrow rim of the same material
#3
Hi, I'm Bryan.
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,650
Bikes: 2010 Focus Mares
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Epic hit it on the head. Unless you're a pro-level racer there's no need for the aero advantage. In my opinion, in a big city they're less aero simply because of the cross winds coming down the streets between buildings. I rode a friend's bike with b43's on it and was getting pushed around by wind at every cross street.
Just my $0.02
Just my $0.02
#5
Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 32
Bikes: 2009 Surly Steamroller, 1984 Peugeot PGN-10, 1992 Romic Custom Road, 1997 Bianchi Alloro
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
they have a large surface for displaying snazzy colors
#6
Your cog is slipping.
Deep Vs - real Velocity Deep Vs - are awesome rims. On the heavy side but it is possible to build a light(ish) wheel by using good spokes and light hubs.
#9
Your cog is slipping.
Not necessarily. That's like saying "With the technological advances the bicycle has made over the past century, fixed gear bikes are less relevant".
Yes, there are a lot of lighter weight deep section rims on the market but Velocity Deep Vs have staying power.
Yes, there are a lot of lighter weight deep section rims on the market but Velocity Deep Vs have staying power.
#10
We win all charity rides
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Central Michigan University/ GR, MI
Posts: 3,369
Bikes: BMX, fixed gear
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
How about those new Foer 41 rims on RG scrod? I was looking at those, I was thinking about getting stronger rims for the super ****ty sidewalks/roads around here. Any feedback on strength?
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: PHL
Posts: 536
Bikes: De Rosa Planet, Shogun Kaze, Jamis Sputnik, Redline 925
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
anything deeper than a deep v is just unnecessary. b43's and the like are just ridiculous. and everyone knows that you get sicker skidz with deep v's, amirite?
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 7,075
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
due to the cross section and strength you can build a wheelset with fewer spokes than a box section rim. keep in mind they are also heavier so there isnt much in the way of a benefit on the street. on a road ride i would rather have lighter rims.
in cyclocross the deep section wheels shed mud and push through sand better than a box section rim.
in cyclocross the deep section wheels shed mud and push through sand better than a box section rim.
#16
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 117
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Ah thanks for all your inputs.
So would Deep Vs mean less going out of true? (since impact should be somewhat "soaked up" by the Deep section?)
Also, what material is the deep section made of? Carbon? wood? plastic? I can't quite tell
So would Deep Vs mean less going out of true? (since impact should be somewhat "soaked up" by the Deep section?)
Also, what material is the deep section made of? Carbon? wood? plastic? I can't quite tell
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 206
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
As a disclaimer, I am a far, far, far cry from any kind of expert. However, I need new wheels, so I've attempted to soak up whatever knowledge I can of late. What I have gleaned is that deep v's are a bit on the heavy side and offer an aerodynamic profile. If you aren't racing the aerodynamic bit is a load of bunk and not worth considering (and if you really are racing you're aero wheels are probably made of carbon and not Al). The heaviness is a bummer, but it plus the profile does contribute to wheel strength. So if you beat your wheels up it'll save you. And if you're trying to "faster" wheel, it offers you the opportunity to use reduced spoke counts to make a lighter/presumably faster wheel.
How you determine how few spokes you can get away with is a science I have not yet figured out. If anyone knows I'm all ears.
How you determine how few spokes you can get away with is a science I have not yet figured out. If anyone knows I'm all ears.
#20
Hi, I'm Bryan.
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,650
Bikes: 2010 Focus Mares
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Rougher road/harder riding (i.e. freestyle) means more spokes in the front. That and tons of torque determine the amount in the back. However, these are very very generalized statements. Stiffness plays a factor, as does spoke gauge. You know what? Imma let a mechanic weigh in on this. Scrod, where ya at?
#21
coasterbrakelockup
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: parts unknown
Posts: 824
Bikes: surly steamroller w/coaster brake, electra single speed cruiser, specialized rockhopper commuter, no-name single speed folder, 700c ultimate wheel, 24" unicycle, specialized bmx lsd, single seat single speed huffy tandem, pink upsidedown parade bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#24
Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 32
Bikes: 2009 Surly Steamroller, 1984 Peugeot PGN-10, 1992 Romic Custom Road, 1997 Bianchi Alloro
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#25
Senior Member
Guy had some cheap stock wheels on a Felt road bike, maybe Alex rims. Broke spokes, but too cheap form a complete rebuild, so... More broken spokes. And these are fairly heavy, too. Set him up with Deep V Velocity Comp wheelset, 28h, radial front, 2x rear; up from the original 20f, 24r spoke setup.
Deep V wheelset was lighter than his stock wheels and will be much stronger.
Gave him the option of lighter rims--was going to suggest Fusion or A23--but he def perked up at mention of Deep V's, and was over the top pleased with them.
Deep V wheelset was lighter than his stock wheels and will be much stronger.
Gave him the option of lighter rims--was going to suggest Fusion or A23--but he def perked up at mention of Deep V's, and was over the top pleased with them.