Anyone go to shorter cranks and like them?
#1
Nice Guy
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 94
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Anyone go to shorter cranks and like them?
About 9 months ago I built a fixed gear conversion. For more cornering clearance, I put 165s on even though my "nice bike" has 170s. I thought it was going to be a compromise and I was going to have to live with it, but wouldn't like it. I have a 30" inseam.
Now I've found that I like the short cranks. I like the feeling of spinning with them. Part of that might be the differences in pedaling a fixed gear, but even when I flip my hub to the ss side, spinning feels great. In fact, when my two bikes are at approximately the same gear ratio, it seems easier to cruise with the shorter cranks.
So now I'm considering swapping out my cranks on my other bike to 165s and I'm just curious, anyone go to shorter cranks and then realize they prefer them?
Nick
Now I've found that I like the short cranks. I like the feeling of spinning with them. Part of that might be the differences in pedaling a fixed gear, but even when I flip my hub to the ss side, spinning feels great. In fact, when my two bikes are at approximately the same gear ratio, it seems easier to cruise with the shorter cranks.
So now I'm considering swapping out my cranks on my other bike to 165s and I'm just curious, anyone go to shorter cranks and then realize they prefer them?
Nick
__________________
'06 Zurich
'81 (or is it an '82?) Univega Sportour (fixie conversion)
I'd rather be riding...
'06 Zurich
'81 (or is it an '82?) Univega Sportour (fixie conversion)
I'd rather be riding...
#2
in ur ____, ___ing ur ___
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 189
Bikes: IRO Mark V
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I just installed a 165s yesterday, and the difference was immediately noticable and spinning was much easier than on my stupidlong 175s
#3
Beercycle!
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
i put 140 bulletproofs on my iro last week and i think theyre great. At first i felt a huge difference, but its all ive been riding for a week and it just feels natural now. Its much better for the knees and i can corner like a madman (no pedal strike).
#4
in ur ____, ___ing ur ___
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 189
Bikes: IRO Mark V
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
140s, jebus. ...
I noticed that shorter cranks are easier on my knees, too. If my knee trouble keeps up, maybe I'll give crazy short cranks a shot.
I noticed that shorter cranks are easier on my knees, too. If my knee trouble keeps up, maybe I'll give crazy short cranks a shot.
#6
jack of one or two trades
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Suburbia, CT
Posts: 5,640
Bikes: Old-ass gearie hardtail MTB, fix-converted Centurion LeMans commuter, SS hardtail monster MTB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I love the 165's on my fix, but I went down to 170's on my MTB, and it's not much fun. I lost a lot of leverage.
#7
oldsprinter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 935
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I went to 165s on my road bike and went compact - shorter cranks and lower gears are a great combination. I think my knees will thank me for it in 30 years.
Also, short cranks are stiffer, give quicker acceleration, tighter cornering.
On the track former world champion Claudio Gollinelli (see YouTube) rode 150mm cranks. Never stopped him winning races.
Ride what feels good.
Also, short cranks are stiffer, give quicker acceleration, tighter cornering.
On the track former world champion Claudio Gollinelli (see YouTube) rode 150mm cranks. Never stopped him winning races.
Ride what feels good.
#8
tarck bike.com exile
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: lancaster, pennsylvania
Posts: 2,058
Bikes: bfssfg iro--black.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
140? damn.
i'm real tall (6'6") so i don't like going with 165s cause i feel like a clown spinning that fast.
i'm real tall (6'6") so i don't like going with 165s cause i feel like a clown spinning that fast.
#9
Beercycle!
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 666pack
140? damn.
i'm real tall (6'6") so i don't like going with 165s cause i feel like a clown spinning that fast.
i'm real tall (6'6") so i don't like going with 165s cause i feel like a clown spinning that fast.
#10
PKF
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 52
Bikes: Cannondale R700, Cannondale Scalpel, Fuji Royale II, Surly Steamroller, Giant OCR2, G.T. Avalanche 2.0, Red Motobecane, Echo
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Ditto on the 140's.
I'm 6' tall and I know it's odd. But it works!
I'm 6' tall and I know it's odd. But it works!
#11
aka mattio
after riding a bike with 170mm cranks on it exclusively, i put 165mm cranks on a nicer bike. the difference was astounding, especially when i'm all hunkered down in the drops. it really helped my comfort and fit on the bike, and since i ride a lower gear on that bike, having the shorter cranks helps my spin. also i'm short.
#12
Nice Guy
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 94
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Well its nice to know that I'm not the only one who wonders about the length of the cranks the the bike industry chooses to put on stock bikes.
Some 165s sure sound nice... as a bonus, Nashbar is having a 20% off sale right now.....
Some 165s sure sound nice... as a bonus, Nashbar is having a 20% off sale right now.....
__________________
'06 Zurich
'81 (or is it an '82?) Univega Sportour (fixie conversion)
I'd rather be riding...
'06 Zurich
'81 (or is it an '82?) Univega Sportour (fixie conversion)
I'd rather be riding...
#13
.
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,860
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm not really sure how I feel about my 165's. There's a smaller circle you have to spin, so there's less arc on each of your joints. I think the short arms might give you incentive to sit and spin rather than stand and mash like you're on a stairmaster, but on a SS/FG you don't really have a choice uphills.
__________________
https://blicksbags.com/
https://blicksbags.com/
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: northern Florida, USA
Posts: 778
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I rode 170s all my life, then got a Bianchi San Jose with 172.5 cranks. I swapped them for 165s and really like it. I usually ride it SS, not FG. I'm (almost) 5'11" with long legs/short torso, if that matters. For my group buy IRO I'm going to use some old Shimano 600 cranks that I have in my spares bin, but they're 170. I wonder how long it'll be before I'm looking for 165s to replace them.
#17
Just smang it.
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Bellingham
Posts: 2,295
Bikes: Felt F1X, Trek 2300 Composite, Dawes Deadeye
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Peter. Whatever you do, don't buy the mirella bike. Buy a Kilo TT.
Also, don't google Mirella at work.
Also, don't google Mirella at work.
#20
Ice Bites
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: cYa tossers
Posts: 57
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I've noticed the 175's help to build power and I like stretching out the stroke for an all day ride, but the 172.5 is quicker on race day and more responsive. I still can't believe 2 1/2 cents could make that big of difference but it does.
#21
Veteran Racer
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Ciudad de Vacas, Tejas
Posts: 11,757
Bikes: 32 frames + 80 wheels
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1331 Post(s)
Liked 764 Times
in
431 Posts
165's on everything except my MTB's, which are 170's. Of course, I'm short with a 28" inseam, so it's like someone a foot taller running 175's. It's all relative to your leg length. If I could find some 160's with a 144mm bcd for the track, I'd get them.
#22
Fresh Garbage
yeah, 175s to me are like 160s to you. I used to ride 165s and currently have 170s on my fg, mainly because that's what I have. I had 170s on the touring bike for a while and it felt weird, I switched to 175 in heartbeat when I found the exact triple I wanted for dirt cheap. I supposed I got used to it on FG but it just felt wrong on the geared bike. Not enough knee flexion
Last edited by hairnet; 11-26-11 at 04:42 PM.
#25
Elitist
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times
in
77 Posts
I went to 165s on my road bike and went compact - shorter cranks and lower gears are a great combination. I think my knees will thank me for it in 30 years.
Also, short cranks are stiffer, give quicker acceleration, tighter cornering.
On the track former world champion Claudio Gollinelli (see YouTube) rode 150mm cranks. Never stopped him winning races.
Ride what feels good.
Also, short cranks are stiffer, give quicker acceleration, tighter cornering.
On the track former world champion Claudio Gollinelli (see YouTube) rode 150mm cranks. Never stopped him winning races.
Ride what feels good.