Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 4 of 19 FirstFirst ... 2345614 ... LastLast
Results 76 to 100 of 457
  1. #76
    Supertouch BP88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Westminster, CA
    My Bikes
    Pake Rum Runner
    Posts
    159
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Just put on the Thomson stem/seatpost and Deda lowrider bars.


  2. #77
    Supertouch BP88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Westminster, CA
    My Bikes
    Pake Rum Runner
    Posts
    159
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Here are a couple of better pics of my bike above; last night it was too dark outside to take a decent picture.

    Stem is a Thomson X2 70mm, bars are Deda CronoNero Lowrider 40cm, and I did a mediocre job taping them with Deda Mistrel bar tape.




  3. #78
    Veteran Racer TejanoTrackie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Ciudad de Vacas, Tejas
    My Bikes
    28 frames + 73 wheels
    Posts
    7,474
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Had a wonderful 25 mile country ride today. Found this neat strap-on water bottle cage that is easy to install/remove w/o tools and won't damage the frame finish. The seat bag has a spare tube, Red Zeppelin CO2 inflator with spare cartridge, 3Wrencho tool and flat plastic tire iron set with several glueless patches in case I get more than one flat or mess up changing the tube. The RB-02 bars are awesomely comfortable, and the Flite saddle was comfy wearing my bib shorts with padded chamois. I think the gearing and riding position is perfect as is, so now I can just enjoy it.
    Attached Images Attached Images
    What, Me Worry? - Alfred E. Neuman

    Quote Originally Posted by Dcv View Post
    I'd like to think i have as much money as brains.

  4. #79
    Senior Member PeDDeR27's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Newark, Bay Area, CA
    My Bikes
    49cm Pake Steel Track 2010
    Posts
    427
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Another picture of mine.


  5. #80
    Psychonaut
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    54
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I finally received my 51cm Pake 7005 series aluminum frameset from the nice UPS girl. I will be posting pictures and a full review soon. For now, I must say that the frame has a nice aesthetic to my eye. The headtube is beautifully machined and tapers perfectly with the carbon fork. I was able to install my cane creek 41mm integrated headset without any hassle. All decals are on top of the clearcoat. The uncut fork is 640g. Cut, 545g. The frame including the replaceable dropouts is 1510g. Wheelbase at minimum is 948mm. the BB height is just about 29cm with 23mm tires.

  6. #81
    Veteran Bastard Scrodzilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    24,053
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Charlie_Zulu View Post
    I finally received my 51cm Pake 7005 series aluminum frameset from the nice UPS girl. I will be posting pictures and a full review soon.
    Of the UPS girl?

  7. #82
    Veteran Racer TejanoTrackie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Ciudad de Vacas, Tejas
    My Bikes
    28 frames + 73 wheels
    Posts
    7,474
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Attached Images Attached Images
    What, Me Worry? - Alfred E. Neuman

    Quote Originally Posted by Dcv View Post
    I'd like to think i have as much money as brains.

  8. #83
    Senior Member vw02's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    St. Paul, MN
    Posts
    282
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Charlie_Zulu View Post
    I finally received my 51cm Pake 7005 series aluminum frameset from the nice UPS girl. I will be posting pictures and a full review soon. For now, I must say that the frame has a nice aesthetic to my eye. The headtube is beautifully machined and tapers perfectly with the carbon fork. I was able to install my cane creek 41mm integrated headset without any hassle. All decals are on top of the clearcoat. The uncut fork is 640g. Cut, 545g. The frame including the replaceable dropouts is 1510g. Wheelbase at minimum is 948mm. the BB height is just about 29cm with 23mm tires.
    rofl if referring to the UPS girl the whole post. "frame has a nice aesthetic to my eye"

  9. #84
    Veteran Bastard Scrodzilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    24,053
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

  10. #85
        Pinkbullet3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    942
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by vw02 View Post
    rofl if referring to the UPS girl the whole post
    Rereading the post with that in mind completely changes everything... o_o
    Quote Originally Posted by Upilu View Post
    are you idiot???

  11. #86
    Psychonaut
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    54
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Here are some photos of the pake aluminum. Sadly, no photos of the UPS girl. I am strongly considering removing the decals. The headtube decal does not lie flat given that the machined headtube has concave sides. The crankset pictured clears the chainstays by less than 1mm, I may need a longer BB spindle in order to have a correct chainline. It was originally a road crankset in very bad condition so I resurfaced it and ground off the extra tabs. I'm planning on finishing the build with a 49 tooth FSA chainring. Track gearing will be 49 / 15.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  12. #87
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    spfd mo
    My Bikes
    big block
    Posts
    486
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    oh god I think I am going to get one of the pakes. please tell me how it rides when you get it all together
    Quote Originally Posted by 91MF View Post

    i guess if you were really bored and high you might build something like this. i would choose masturbating. or eating doritos.
    http://www.pedalroom.com/member/calvintodd

  13. #88
    Psychonaut
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    54
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    P1010007.jpgP1010012.jpgP1010002.jpg
    Quote Originally Posted by calbob76 View Post
    oh god I think I am going to get one of the pakes. please tell me how it rides when you get it all together
    Yes. I will be racing at my local velodrome this summer on this bike. It is a 333m concrete outdoor so I was not concerned about the relatively low BB. Many more pictures and a full review will come once I can order the chainring. I have ridden other 7 series aluminum frames with carbon forks before but never one with tubes of such a large diameter. The downtube appears 2" in diameter, woah. I realized while building it up that in order to avoid damaging the dropouts (which only have the stainless steel on the outside) one must use a cone wrench to hold the locknuts in place while fastening the axle bolts. Otherwise premature wear of the paint and aluminum may occur, I think.

    I would like to add that the geometry of this bike is well suited to those who prefer a short reach. I had considered a Leader, but realized that the long top tubes don't suit my body well. My 51cm frame has a TT of 528mm, perfect with a 105mm stem and medium reach bars. But beware! the 53cm has a sloping TT. All other sized do not, at least given the info on the geo chart.

  14. #89
    hamcycles.com hamfoh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    3,886
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    sexy. I wonder why its Pake branded instead of Soma. I see that "P" and I think "economy" normally but that frame is very nice looking.
    Bikes - past and present

  15. #90
    Veteran Racer TejanoTrackie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Ciudad de Vacas, Tejas
    My Bikes
    28 frames + 73 wheels
    Posts
    7,474
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Charlie_Zulu View Post
    I realized while building it up that in order to avoid damaging the dropouts (which only have the stainless steel on the outside) one must use a cone wrench to hold the locknuts in place while fastening the axle bolts. Otherwise premature wear of the paint and aluminum may occur, I think.
    You don't have to do this if a) you use plenty of grease on the axle threads and b) tighten the right and left sides sequentially by first just snugging the right nut, then the left nut, then further tighten the right, then the left, then really tighten the right only. Also, make sure the nut washers are not binding on the nuts. Finally, use locknuts with serrations on them that grip the dropouts when tightened.
    What, Me Worry? - Alfred E. Neuman

    Quote Originally Posted by Dcv View Post
    I'd like to think i have as much money as brains.

  16. #91
    Psychonaut
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    54
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    P1010003.jpg
    Quote Originally Posted by TejanoTrackie View Post
    You don't have to do this if a) you use plenty of grease on the axle threads and b) tighten the right and left sides sequentially by first just snugging the right nut, then the left nut, then further tighten the right, then the left, then really tighten the right only. Also, make sure the nut washers are not binding on the nuts. Finally, use locknuts with serrations on them that grip the dropouts when tightened.
    Hey, thanks for the tip TT. These Paul hubs use bolts to secure the rear wheel axle to the dropouts and they use a sort of integrated washer that ensures that the outer portion of the dropouts do not receive any friction from tightening the bolt.

    Regarding the decals. I would keep them all if they were applied correctly. The fact that the shaped headtube does not receive the flat sticker kills it for me. I believe the frameset is of very good quality for the price and I would show my pride in the brand if they had put just a bit more effort into it. Having said that, I can't think of a reasonable alternative given the low MSRP.

    Pic not related.

  17. #92
    Senior Member Sherblock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Northern California
    My Bikes
    I have a biek
    Posts
    1,668
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Anyone else see a problem with the above pic? Looks to me as if the chainring won't fit.

  18. #93
    Psychonaut
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    54
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Sherblock View Post
    Anyone else see a problem with the above pic? Looks to me as if the chainring won't fit.
    I was also doubtful when I put torque on the crank bolt. I still expect to have to install a new BB with a longer spindle. Perhaps 110mm instead of 107mm. However I did mock it up with a 53 tooth chainring just to check the clearance. It was very close, but cleared the chainstay. Perhaps the flex generated from pedaling would cause the ring or spider to make contact if I wanted to use that arrangement but the longer spindle I'm planning makes this irrelevant. The crankset I chose will make a narrow enough tread or Q factor despite the longer spindle.

    Very excited about racing this machine.

  19. #94
    Ths Hipstr Kills Masheenz cc700's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    seattle
    My Bikes
    tirove
    Posts
    8,544
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by hamfoh View Post
    sexy. I wonder why its Pake branded instead of Soma. I see that "P" and I think "economy" normally but that frame is very nice looking.
    It's branding. this frame is too newjack and impractical for soma. soma makes bikes that are sensibly updated from good heritage... and they are all steel.

    the french 75 makes more sense as a pake. they got this one right.

    that said i'm not all that impressed and feel like you could do better with a dodici or a http://airwalkfixed.blogspot.com/200...set-116kg.html

  20. #95
    Psychonaut
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    54
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by cc700 View Post
    It's branding. this frame is too newjack and impractical for soma. soma makes bikes that are sensibly updated from good heritage... and they are all steel.

    the french 75 makes more sense as a pake. they got this one right.

    that said i'm not all that impressed and feel like you could do better with a dodici or a http://airwalkfixed.blogspot.com/200...set-116kg.html
    What makes you say that this frame is impractical? I has typical track geometry, not unlike the Rush. It also costed me significantly less than the "Elite lightest Frameset" you linked to in addition to having replaceable dropout inserts.

    I was also considering the lowest end aluminum Dolan for my track racing bike. However the cost was prohibitive.

  21. #96
    Ths Hipstr Kills Masheenz cc700's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    seattle
    My Bikes
    tirove
    Posts
    8,544
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    have you ridden an aluminum track bike on the street before? i'd take a rush any day. i don't mean practical in a 'cost efficiency' sense, i mean in a 'best bike to ride on city streets' sense.

    this may fight it out with an entry dolan on the track just fine. but that's not a good reason to call it a soma...

    this bike doesn't have the 'vintage' appeal of a soma. i'm not saying a more expensive frame is more practical or less practical or that this bike is or isn't a good value, i'm saying steel = soma and aluminum therefore does not.

  22. #97
    Psychonaut
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    54
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by cc700 View Post
    have you ridden an aluminum track bike on the street before? i'd take a rush any day. i don't mean practical in a 'cost efficiency' sense, i mean in a 'best bike to ride on city streets' sense.

    this may fight it out with an entry dolan on the track just fine. but that's not a good reason to call it a soma...

    this bike doesn't have the 'vintage' appeal of a soma. i'm not saying a more expensive frame is more practical or less practical or that this bike is or isn't a good value, i'm saying steel = soma and aluminum therefore does not.
    I strongly agree with your opinion regarding the branding of this product. It is no soma. I bought this bike as a track racing machine so the comfort on the road is irrelevant to me personally.

  23. #98
    hamcycles.com hamfoh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    3,886
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    weird I never knew Soma's name had that much prestige
    Bikes - past and present

  24. #99
    Just smang it. EpicSchwinn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Spokane
    My Bikes
    '88 Trek 2300 Composite, '11 Dawes Deadeye
    Posts
    2,233
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    That Pake sure looks good. A lot better than I would've guessed from the photos on their website - they could've done a better job on those. I had a similar issue running a Shimano 600 crankset on my Rush. It has a little more clearance for the crank itself but I clear by less than a millimeter with a 53t chainring.

  25. #100
    Psychonaut
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    54
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by EpicSchwinn View Post
    That Pake sure looks good. A lot better than I would've guessed from the photos on their website - they could've done a better job on those. I had a similar issue running a Shimano 600 crankset on my Rush. It has a little more clearance for the crank itself but I clear by less than a millimeter with a 53t chainring.
    What length of BB spindle did you use? I am performing an experiment using a 144 BCD road crankset for a track bike. Determining the correct chainline will require some careful measurements on my part.

Page 4 of 19 FirstFirst ... 2345614 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •