Mavic ellipse vs Velocity Deep V's
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 67
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Mavic ellipse vs Velocity Deep V's
So just out of curiosity--
What makes the mavic ellipse wheels so much better than a velocity deep v or fusion rim laced up to some novatechs? Other than the bladed spokes i can't see what justifies the $300 price difference. Wouldnt they both weigh in around 2000grams?
Enlighten me!
What makes the mavic ellipse wheels so much better than a velocity deep v or fusion rim laced up to some novatechs? Other than the bladed spokes i can't see what justifies the $300 price difference. Wouldnt they both weigh in around 2000grams?
Enlighten me!
#4
Just smang it.
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Bellingham
Posts: 2,295
Bikes: Felt F1X, Trek 2300 Composite, Dawes Deadeye
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
#5
Senior Member
Yes
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 67
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It says Mavic on them....
Scrodzilla
I had a set of Ellipses for a hot minute. FWIW, I hated them.
I had a set of Ellipses for a hot minute. FWIW, I hated them.
#11
Senior Member
#12
Senior Member
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,869
Bikes: '14 Kona Rove, '06 Bob Jackson
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 67
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I think theyre quality rims!
But the fact is, one open pro rim is like 75 bucks. You can buy a velocity wheelset on velomine for 150.
Or fusion rims for 15 from iro.
But the fact is, one open pro rim is like 75 bucks. You can buy a velocity wheelset on velomine for 150.
Or fusion rims for 15 from iro.
#15
Your cog is slipping.
Aero spokes are unecessary, they felt clunky/cheap and as mihlbach said, the straight pull spokes make truing more of a pin in the ass than it's worth.
I'd much rather have a well-built Velocity wheelset using quality spokes any day - which is why that's what I ride.
I'd much rather have a well-built Velocity wheelset using quality spokes any day - which is why that's what I ride.
#16
Fresh Garbage
I bought into it while I was still rather new and it didnt really pay off. My front wheel is nice but the rear hasn't proven to be all that durable and now the eyelets rattle
#17
!
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Olympia,WA
Posts: 186
Bikes: The Hour
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#18
Senior Member
From what I have read about Sapim cx rays, aero spokes can withstand more load cycles than round spokes. Maybe its marketing hype or maybe its real, or maybe it only applies to cx rays and not other aero spokes...I dunno. I have two wheelsets with cx rays and a few others with other aero spokes, and none of the have ever broken. I have busted round spokes, so maybe there's something to it.
But no, $3 per cx ray is not worth it, over a round butted spoke, unless you are building a low spoke count wheel meant for speed.
I still like to use them though. You can hold the spoke in place while you tighten it. They take longer to build with but allow you to fine tune the tension more easily.
But no, $3 per cx ray is not worth it, over a round butted spoke, unless you are building a low spoke count wheel meant for speed.
I still like to use them though. You can hold the spoke in place while you tighten it. They take longer to build with but allow you to fine tune the tension more easily.
#19
Still kicking.
Hope their spokes are better than their spoke nipples. Had gotten a bag of 100 sapim polyax brass self lock in 14g/14m. Worst spoke nipples that I have ever used in my life.
__________________
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
#20
Veteran Racer
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Ciudad de Vacas, Tejas
Posts: 11,757
Bikes: 32 frames + 80 wheels
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1331 Post(s)
Liked 764 Times
in
431 Posts
I have raced with wheels that had various types of bladed and ovalized spokes, and I can attest to their being far more aerodynamic than regular round spokes at racing speeds. At normal riding speeds under 20 mph there is little tangible benefit. I can also attest to the fact that butted spokes like Sapim Lasers that cost much less than C X-Rays provide a substantial reduction in drag over regular straight 14 gage spokes, while giving up nothing in strength. It's been over 20 years since I've broken any quality stainless steel spokes, although I have destroyed numerous lightweight rims due to wrecks, potholes and railroad tracks. I honestly can't understand why someone weighing north of 220 lbs would worry about saving 50 grams on rim weight (difference between XR-200 and XR-270), when a deeper section rim would be much stronger and stiffer.
#21
Veteran Racer
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Ciudad de Vacas, Tejas
Posts: 11,757
Bikes: 32 frames + 80 wheels
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1331 Post(s)
Liked 764 Times
in
431 Posts
I've built two wheels with Sapim Polyax brass nipples and they were fine ? What is this "self-lock" you speak of ?
#22
Still kicking.
If they are used on a disc brake wheelset, you can't get proper spoke tension without stripping the plastic liner that self locks the spoke to the spoke nipple.
I have 99 of them left, not sure if I will build a 700c wheelset with them or get rid of them.
I have 99 of them left, not sure if I will build a 700c wheelset with them or get rid of them.
__________________
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
Last edited by Dannihilator; 12-11-11 at 09:46 PM.
#23
Elitist
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times
in
77 Posts
I have raced with wheels that had various types of bladed and ovalized spokes, and I can attest to their being far more aerodynamic than regular round spokes at racing speeds. At normal riding speeds under 20 mph there is little tangible benefit. I can also attest to the fact that butted spokes like Sapim Lasers that cost much less than C X-Rays provide a substantial reduction in drag over regular straight 14 gage spokes, while giving up nothing in strength. It's been over 20 years since I've broken any quality stainless steel spokes, although I have destroyed numerous lightweight rims due to wrecks, potholes and railroad tracks. I honestly can't understand why someone weighing north of 220 lbs would worry about saving 50 grams on rim weight (difference between XR-200 and XR-270), when a deeper section rim would be much stronger and stiffer.
The Mavic Ellipse aren't significantly lighter than many off-the-shelf fixed gear wheels. Plus, if you build custom, you can choose spoke counts and guages that are appropriate for your intended use and weight.
#24
Still kicking.
Well, to answer the thread, between the two, I would probably go the velocity route, but use aeroheads or a23's instead of the deepv or fusion.
__________________
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 7,075
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts