Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 21 of 21
  1. #1
    Senior Member Chesha Neko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    295
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Best way to achieve 69 gear inches?

    My Steamroller came set up 44/19, which makes going uphill easy, going downhill a *****, and is slow everywhere else. According to Sheldon's calculator 61.1 gear inches (For 700 X 25 / 25-622 tire with 165 mm cranks). So I'm aiming to move up to around 69 gear inches and there are quite a few ways to make that happen.

    The stock Andel cranks have a 130 BCD and I see rings up to 50t available, so I could go 50t up front and keep the 19t in back for 69.4 gear inches. However it seems that most here are running 46t and 48t rings, is there any reason why going to a 50t would be a bad idea in this case?
    "I stick to my basic plan of simply keeping the pedals turning."
    -- Kent Peterson, The Way of the Mountain Turtle

  2. #2
    Morton Nagrom_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    East Bay
    My Bikes
    Kilo TT, CAAD10
    Posts
    9,679
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    keep the front chainring... put a 16t cog in the back... 72.5... a little over, but its not a big deal

    or if it is a big deal... throw a 17t on the back for 68.3.....

    EDIT: only bad reason for not going up is due to cost... a decent front chainring will run you like 50 bucks minimum... you can get a rear cog for like... 15 bucks?

  3. #3
    Veteran Racer TejanoTrackie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Ciudad de Vacas, Tejas
    My Bikes
    28 frames + 73 wheels
    Posts
    7,470
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Chesha Neko View Post
    The stock Andel cranks have a 130 BCD
    I think you are wrong. I have 4 sets of Andel cranks and they all have a 144mm BCD.
    What, Me Worry? - Alfred E. Neuman

    Quote Originally Posted by Dcv View Post
    I'd like to think i have as much money as brains.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Chesha Neko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    295
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    I would prefer 144s, but you can see for yourself they're 130s.
    "I stick to my basic plan of simply keeping the pedals turning."
    -- Kent Peterson, The Way of the Mountain Turtle

  5. #5
    sɹɐʇsɟoןןnɟsʇıbɟɯo jdgesus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    seattle, too many links
    My Bikes
    fixed gear recumbent trike
    Posts
    3,990
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    the and els on my roller are 130 aswell. FWIW BBQ
    Quote Originally Posted by yummygooey View Post
    crabon/campy/rapha/roadie-bro.

    next step is recumbent.




    my bikes | bike blog | beer blog | work 1 | work 2

  6. #6
    Veteran Racer TejanoTrackie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Ciudad de Vacas, Tejas
    My Bikes
    28 frames + 73 wheels
    Posts
    7,470
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Well, I'll be. First time I've ever seen Andels in 130bcd, and Steamrollers used to come with 144bcd cranks.
    What, Me Worry? - Alfred E. Neuman

    Quote Originally Posted by Dcv View Post
    I'd like to think i have as much money as brains.

  7. #7
    It's MY mountain DiabloScott's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Mt.Diablo
    Posts
    5,422
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Chesha Neko View Post
    it seems that most here are running 46t and 48t rings,
    I think there's some bias in the data, or how you perceive it. People with big rings are more likely to mention how big their rings are, or you're more likely to remember. I've got a 42-16 for 71". A 44-17 will be a fine gear for you at 68.3". There's no reason to change your ring except for looks, or unless you really want something part way between 68.3 and 72.5.

    BTW, crank length has nothing to do with your gear... it does affect another parameter that Sheldon discusses, but not gear inches.
    http://diabloscott.blogspot.com/

  8. #8
    Senior Member Kayce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    St Louis
    Posts
    1,844
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The chain ring and the cog are of about equal quality, so thats not a reason to change one over the other. Cogs are cheaper than rings, advantage cog. Rings are easier to swap out at home, advantage ring. More ability to fine tune things with rings, advantage ring. Rings wear out faster than cogs, advantage cog.

    Thats how i see things.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Spoonrobot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,184
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    48t chainrings and smaller are mainly so common because they're stock on a lot of cranksets/bikes from the factory since they usually allow generous clearance with a wide variety of frames. Once you get past 48t you start running into chainstay clearance issues with the short spindles most SS/FG run.

    So, nothing inherently wrong with running bigger chainrings, just make sure they fit on your frame.

  10. #10
    Senior Member Chesha Neko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    295
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Kayce View Post
    Rings wear out faster than cogs, advantage cog.
    Part of why I am looking at changing the ring is to go to a steel Surly chainring.

    Quote Originally Posted by Spoonrobot View Post
    48t chainrings and smaller are mainly so common because they're stock on a lot of cranksets/bikes from the factory since they usually allow generous clearance with a wide variety of frames. Once you get past 48t you start running into chainstay clearance issues with the short spindles most SS/FG run.

    So, nothing inherently wrong with running bigger chainrings, just make sure they fit on your frame.
    Excellent point, one I had overlooked. I checked and Surly states that the Steamroller has clearance for up to 50t -- and that explains the indentation on the drive-side chainstay. Thanks for the heads up.
    Last edited by Chesha Neko; 01-10-12 at 09:34 PM.
    "I stick to my basic plan of simply keeping the pedals turning."
    -- Kent Peterson, The Way of the Mountain Turtle

  11. #11
    Veteran Racer TejanoTrackie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Ciudad de Vacas, Tejas
    My Bikes
    28 frames + 73 wheels
    Posts
    7,470
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Chesha Neko View Post
    Part of why I am looking at changing the ring is to go to a steel Surly chainring.
    ¿ Porqué acero ?
    What, Me Worry? - Alfred E. Neuman

    Quote Originally Posted by Dcv View Post
    I'd like to think i have as much money as brains.

  12. #12
    sɹɐʇsɟoןןnɟsʇıbɟɯo jdgesus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    seattle, too many links
    My Bikes
    fixed gear recumbent trike
    Posts
    3,990
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by TejanoTrackie View Post
    Well, I'll be. First time I've ever seen Andels in 130bcd, and Steamrollers used to come with 144bcd cranks.
    and rollers used to be better.
    i swear to god this 2011 roller is a ****ign piece of ****
    Quote Originally Posted by yummygooey View Post
    crabon/campy/rapha/roadie-bro.

    next step is recumbent.




    my bikes | bike blog | beer blog | work 1 | work 2

  13. #13
    Veteran Racer TejanoTrackie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Ciudad de Vacas, Tejas
    My Bikes
    28 frames + 73 wheels
    Posts
    7,470
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by jdgesus View Post
    and rollers used to be better.
    i swear to god this 2011 roller is a ****ign piece of ****
    And to think they upped the price by $100 as well. Pay more for less.

    Too bad you never got the Big Block.
    What, Me Worry? - Alfred E. Neuman

    Quote Originally Posted by Dcv View Post
    I'd like to think i have as much money as brains.

  14. #14
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    A1A
    Posts
    594
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    @Chesha Neko...as someone who uses alu chainrings i will echo the question "why steel?", but fyi surly does offer steel rings in 130mm.

    & sorry to hijack your thread, but as a steamroller owner/devotee i feel obligated to bring a few facts into the jdgesus & TejanoTrackie steamroller discussion...

    mine is a 07 model, it came with 130mm rd2 crankset. i believe surly switched to 130 andels for completes in 09. so i don't see when 'rollers could've ever come with 144s. i have not even seen a 2011 sr in person so i cannot make a factual statement as to its quality, but are rd2 cranks so much superior to andels, & are differing handlebars so terrible & hard to change-out that they turned such a universally well-regarded bike into "a ****ign piece of ****"? because besides the colors, those are about the main things they changed over the years. and TT, could you please tell me about any bike, including your beloved bikedirect offerings, not going up a few bucks over the course of 3-4-5-years?

  15. #15
    AEO
    AEO is offline
    Senior Member AEO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    A Coffin Called Earth. or Toronto, ON
    My Bikes
    Bianchi, Miyata, Dahon, Rossin
    Posts
    12,245
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    hey, if you're going to replace the entire thing, then you might as well go for 42x16.

    http://www.gear-calculator.com/#
    Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
    http://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm

  16. #16
    Old fart JohnDThompson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Appleton WI
    My Bikes
    Several, mostly not name brands.
    Posts
    12,450
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by TejanoTrackie View Post
    ¿ Porqué acero ?
    Uhh, "steel is real?"

  17. #17
    Veteran Racer TejanoTrackie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Ciudad de Vacas, Tejas
    My Bikes
    28 frames + 73 wheels
    Posts
    7,470
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnDThompson View Post
    Uhh, "steel is real?"
    Yeah, and very very heavy....
    Attached Images Attached Images
    What, Me Worry? - Alfred E. Neuman

    Quote Originally Posted by Dcv View Post
    I'd like to think i have as much money as brains.

  18. #18
    Senior Member Chesha Neko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    295
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Steel wears more slowly. My Steamroller is a daily commuter.

    Quote Originally Posted by AEO View Post
    hey, if you're going to replace the entire thing, then you might as well go for 42x16.

    http://www.gear-calculator.com/#
    So my question is why would 42x16 be a better solution than 50x19?
    "I stick to my basic plan of simply keeping the pedals turning."
    -- Kent Peterson, The Way of the Mountain Turtle

  19. #19
    AEO
    AEO is offline
    Senior Member AEO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    A Coffin Called Earth. or Toronto, ON
    My Bikes
    Bianchi, Miyata, Dahon, Rossin
    Posts
    12,245
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Chesha Neko View Post
    Steel wears more slowly. My Steamroller is a daily commuter.



    So my question is why would 42x16 be a better solution than 50x19?
    from a wear stand point? 50x19 would be better in that case. It's just that you never mentioned that you were looking for longevity.

    The more teeth a chain engages, the longer it will last.
    Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
    http://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm

  20. #20
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    A1A
    Posts
    594
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Chesha Neko View Post
    So my question is why would 42x16 be a better solution than 50x19?
    the main reason to buy just a new cog rather than chainring is simply cost. on the other hand, if you have to buy both a new ring & a new cog to get the g/i you are seeking, there is a school of thought that a bigger ring/cog combo will give better wear & longer life...

  21. #21
    old legs
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    953
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    42x16 gives you 8 skid patches 50x19 gives you 19....primes are good that way. I ran 44x17 on 28c's with good results

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •