Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Senior Member spectastic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    texas
    My Bikes
    road bikes
    Posts
    1,735
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    thinking about converting to singlespeed, ratio suggestions?

    I have a short commute of 3 miles, and my town is relatively flat, and I basically never change gears unless it's really windy or really hot. I was wondering what it would be like to ride with a singlespeed. After some intense gear counting, I determined that I typically use the ratios 52:15 (for 700c) and 52:18 (for 27"). But I also realize that ss cranks are a lot smaller, so I'm hoping to get some suggestions for the gear ratio.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Spoonrobot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,184
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

  3. #3
    Senior Member spectastic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    texas
    My Bikes
    road bikes
    Posts
    1,735
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    haha my bad

  4. #4
    Sir Fallalot wroomwroomoops's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    5,171
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by spectastic View Post
    I have a short commute of 3 miles, and my town is relatively flat, and I basically never change gears unless it's really windy or really hot. I was wondering what it would be like to ride with a singlespeed. After some intense gear counting, I determined that I typically use the ratios 52:15 (for 700c) and 52:18 (for 27"). But I also realize that ss cranks are a lot smaller, so I'm hoping to get some suggestions for the gear ratio.
    This is what I don't get: the diameter difference between a 27" and a 700C wheel is much smaller than the gear ratio difference between a 52:15 vs. 52:18.

    That said, as a longtime SS cyclist (feel free to call me a singlespeed fanboi), I think that the lower gear ratio of the two, 52:18, would perhaps suit you better for riding across town, because of the frequent stop-start situations. You'll appreciate the better acceleration. If your commute where 10+ miles with little to no traffic (or traffic signs), I'd suggest the higher.

    Regarding cranks: I've always used 172.5 cm or 175 cm cranks on my SS bikes. You'd need shorter cranks (I assume) if you were riding fixed gear, for safer cornering. An experienced fixed gear cyclist might correct me, if I'm wrong.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    NorCal
    My Bikes
    A growing pile of them.
    Posts
    52
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've got a 52:18 ration on 700's with 165 cranks in a town with some big hills. Takes a little getting used to to go down the hills on a fixed gear with no brakes, but it's not bad for getting around.

  6. #6
    Senior Member IthaDan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Ithaca, NY
    My Bikes
    Click on the #YOLO
    Posts
    4,651
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If the crankset on the pre conversion bike is a 52/42, use the 42. Not only better chain line, but 42/16 is pretty much perfect for daily riding.

    Shimano : Click :: Campy :: Snap :: SRAM : Bang

  7. #7
    Not actually Tmonk TMonk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    My Bikes
    caad9, capo (fixed), centurion dave scott 10sp, dolan pre cursa (track)
    Posts
    6,164
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    remember... gear ratio is proportional to penis size... just sayin'

    having said that I ride a 53/11
    "Your beauty is an aeroplane;
    so high, my heart cannot bear the strain." -A.C. Jobim, Triste

  8. #8
    Newbie mytifred's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    O.C., SoCal
    Posts
    4
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Take a look at Sheldon Brown's gear calculator, to get an idea of gear comparisons http://www.sheldonbrown.com/gears/

    I agree with Dan, that a 42/16, which with 700x23 tires gives 69" of progression is optimal for a variety of terrain/conditions. I've used 49/19, which gives 67.8", for years, and it's worked well for me, flats or hills.

  9. #9
    Senior Member spectastic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    texas
    My Bikes
    road bikes
    Posts
    1,735
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    don't take this offensively, but I realized that there is no real advantage spending money to switch to ss. shalom

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •