Fixed>>Freewheel Winter Bike?
10-01-12, 10:58 PM
#1
SpecialK
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: CO Springs
Posts: 373
Bikes: 2007 SE Lager
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Fixed>>Freewheel Winter Bike?
So I have a fixed I'm happy with, but will be moving to Breckenridge and don't really wanna deal with spinning down hills and dying going back up. So going to freewheel, lowering the GI to somewhere around 58, replacing the risers with road drops and putting brakes back on, and getting cross tires.
My question, mind I will be dealing with winter conditions often, is whether or not it is worth my money to get a cross fork with a cantilever up front or will I not really get that much better brake power on the rims compared to baseline Tektro calipers I already have? Would it be a smarter buy to just get nicer (roomier?) calipers? Or should I just stick with what I have cause upgrading wont really do enough to warrant the expense?
My question, mind I will be dealing with winter conditions often, is whether or not it is worth my money to get a cross fork with a cantilever up front or will I not really get that much better brake power on the rims compared to baseline Tektro calipers I already have? Would it be a smarter buy to just get nicer (roomier?) calipers? Or should I just stick with what I have cause upgrading wont really do enough to warrant the expense?
10-02-12, 07:15 AM
#3
Senior Member
Leave it as is unless you want to go disc.
Cantis won't be noticeably better that calipers when your rims have a sheet of ice on them or are packed with snow.
Winter biking in Summit County - don't get run over by a gaper.
Cantis won't be noticeably better that calipers when your rims have a sheet of ice on them or are packed with snow.
Winter biking in Summit County - don't get run over by a gaper.
10-02-12, 07:18 AM
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 206
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I could be misinformed here, so someone feel free to correct me, but my impression is that cantilevers don't provide added stopping power over standard calipers (I've actually been told its less), just increased clearance for wider tires. If you can fit the width you want in your frame without changing brakes, save your pennies.
10-02-12, 07:39 AM
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: central Ohio
Posts: 926
Bikes: Schwinn Madison, Windsor Dover
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Linear pull cantis? As mentioned, with ice covered pads and rims there won't be any noteable difference, but in normal conditions I feel linear pull cantis may provide better stopping power over standard cantis.
10-02-12, 07:40 AM
#6
Lost
you're confusing a few issues. tire clearance is mostly dependent on your frame and fork. depending on the frame you have, if its a road or track frame will determine the maximum tire width, not the calipers. long reach calipers can be used to fit wider tires, but only if the frame accommodates them, and most road/track frames do not. canti brakes, in general provide less stopping power than good calipers, mini-v's are a better option if you need better stopping power and you can sacrifice some tire clearance, provided you have canti brake studs on the frame/fork. most road/track/fixed frames will NOT fit cross tires, unless its made for that purpose.
__________________
https://less-than-epic.blogspot.com/
https://less-than-epic.blogspot.com/
10-02-12, 07:53 AM
#7
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times
in
1,579 Posts
10-02-12, 08:24 AM
#8
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,396
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,696 Times
in
2,517 Posts
I always thought that fixed was a little nicer than a freewheel for winter because you can slow down without braking. But it's been 30 years since I rode fixed, so this could be wrong
10-02-12, 09:13 AM
#9
We win all charity rides
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Central Michigan University/ GR, MI
Posts: 3,369
Bikes: BMX, fixed gear
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
In my experience it applies. I did a ride last December on nice dry and clear roads, and then went on a trail that was covered in snow and ice. Felt pretty much in control, and there was noticeably less sliding. Sort of the same for rain.
10-02-12, 01:23 PM
#10
SpecialK
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: CO Springs
Posts: 373
Bikes: 2007 SE Lager
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If there is a Kilo of SSCX with disc this might be the answer.
I would generally stick with fixed, but I'll be in the mountains. So spinning in iffy conditions so that my GI isn't annoyingly high for the hills doesn't sound too fun.
I would generally stick with fixed, but I'll be in the mountains. So spinning in iffy conditions so that my GI isn't annoyingly high for the hills doesn't sound too fun.
Last edited by CharneK; 10-02-12 at 01:27 PM.
10-02-12, 03:51 PM
#11
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,784
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3587 Post(s)
Liked 3,400 Times
in
1,934 Posts
