Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
Reload this Page >

Please recommend: Kilo TT Pro or SST AL for short commutes

Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

Please recommend: Kilo TT Pro or SST AL for short commutes

Old 02-20-13, 05:49 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 13
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Please recommend: Kilo TT Pro or SST AL for short commutes

Hi,

I recently sold my entry-level aluminium road bike (Schwinn Fastback Comp) and am looking to get a SS/FG. I've been reading threads here for the past few days, but still couldn't decide. (I read the threads for maybe 10 hours last night.)

I am 175 cm tall (5'9", I think) with around 81cm (31-32") inseam. I'm pretty light (145 lbs). I would be using this bike to commute very short distances, maybe 5-6 miles a day. I live in the bay area, so it rains some time. I'm a student so I don't really have a regular roofed space for my bike. I plan to keep this bike for a long time after I graduate.

My choices are now down to either Mercier Kilo TT Pro (50cm C-C?) and Dawes SST AL (54cm C-T).

Below are some of my concerns/questions. It would be great if any experienced users could help me.
  1. The geometry of the two bikes look very different. Is 50cm C-C on the Kilo TT the right size for me? Or should I go with 53cm C-C? I read that the Kilo's geometry is more "aggressive." Looking at my old bike's specs, the top tube is around 550mm and I was ok with that. Would I have trouble adjusting to the "aggressive" geometry (shorter top tube?) of the Kilo?
  2. Component-wise, which has better stock components? Another way to put this might be, how much more do I have to spend on each bike to make necessary upgrades? (I'll be getting 17T cog and a new lockring for either bike anyways... since SST AL doesn't come with it, and I need to replace a crappy cog on the Kilo TT.)
  3. I'm vain... but I kinda like the look of the steel frame a bit better. Is the SST AL much lighter? Should I worry about rust, etc. on the steel frame?
  4. Is there other things I should consider or worry about?

Hopefully I'd be able to pull the trigger by today, as my friend suggested that I've been spending way too much time looking at bikes >.<

Thanks so much you guys!
fishix is offline  
Old 02-20-13, 05:56 PM
  #2  
Has Brakes
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Dallas Tx
Posts: 79
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
SST AL isnt much lighter than a Kilo TT would be from my experience. I saw some Kilo TT's today and was very impressed by them.
(There is a guy local who is selling a SST AL and says it weighs in at alittle over 21lbs, which is heavy for alum.(Also cant comment on how right/wrong he is.))

I would say go for the Kilo TT , im betting that alot of others will say the same.
Regarding the size if you have a 31-32" inseam, i would go for the 50cm if your 5'9". Dont know how long your arms might be but i think it would be best to stay on the smaller side since your 5'9".
LeosLeader is offline  
Old 02-20-13, 05:57 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
seanifred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Bay Area/Davis, CA
Posts: 394
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
personally, i would go with 53cm tt pro. i am 5'10'' and ride a 55 normally, which is the 53 in the tt. although, i have pretty long arms and legs, lanky.

my friend has the sst al and loves it. its fine but i think the looks of the tt are much better.
seanifred is offline  
Old 02-20-13, 06:05 PM
  #4  
Your cog is slipping.
 
Scrodzilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 26,054
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 640 Post(s)
Liked 100 Times in 58 Posts
Originally Posted by fishix
  1. The geometry of the two bikes look very different. Is 50cm C-C on the Kilo TT the right size for me? Or should I go with 53cm C-C? I read that the Kilo's geometry is more "aggressive." Looking at my old bike's specs, the top tube is around 550mm and I was ok with that. Would I have trouble adjusting to the "aggressive" geometry (shorter top tube?) of the Kilo?
  2. Component-wise, which has better stock components? Another way to put this might be, how much more do I have to spend on each bike to make necessary upgrades? (I'll be getting 17T cog and a new lockring for either bike anyways... since SST AL doesn't come with it, and I need to replace a crappy cog on the Kilo TT.)
  3. I'm vain... but I kinda like the look of the steel frame a bit better. Is the SST AL much lighter? Should I worry about rust, etc. on the steel frame?
  4. Is there other things I should consider or worry about?
  1. Stop guessing and use a fit calculator.
  2. Ride the bike before even thinking about "upgrades". There's nothing wrong with the stock cog on the Kilo TT.
  3. The SST-AL is probably heavier.
  4. I'm sure there is.

Last edited by Scrodzilla; 02-20-13 at 06:15 PM.
Scrodzilla is offline  
Old 02-20-13, 06:14 PM
  #5  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 13
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Yup did that earlier and get something like this. Sorry I forgot to post this earlier. These I get from quick measurements though... so might not be entirely accurate... but shouldn't be that much off.

As you can see, this doesn't match very well with the Kilo TT 50cm

<<Please see updated fit below>>

Last edited by fishix; 02-20-13 at 06:51 PM.
fishix is offline  
Old 02-20-13, 06:19 PM
  #6  
Fixie Infamous
 
Nagrom_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: SF
Posts: 10,474

Bikes: 2007 CAAD Optimo Track, 2012 Cannondale CAAD10, 1996 GT Force restomod, 2015 Cannondale CAADX

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 54 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
You put garbage in, you get garbage out. Do it right.
Nagrom_ is offline  
Old 02-20-13, 06:19 PM
  #7  
Your cog is slipping.
 
Scrodzilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 26,054
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 640 Post(s)
Liked 100 Times in 58 Posts
You can't determine an accurate fit from "quick measurements". Take 10 minutes, have someone help you and do it right.

edit:


Last edited by Scrodzilla; 02-20-13 at 06:21 PM. Reason: Whoomp!
Scrodzilla is offline  
Old 02-20-13, 06:24 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
az_andrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 256

Bikes: 2009 Masi Speciale Fixed LTD, 1993 Specialized Allez Transition, 2012 Cinelli Gazzetta (in progress)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
when will these posts end
az_andrew is offline  
Old 02-20-13, 06:24 PM
  #9  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 13
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Okie. Will do that and update ASAP.

Edit: Here's the updated fit.
Thanks so much for your inputs, you guys!

[TABLE="width: 618"]
[TR]
[TH="align: center"] [/TH]
[TH="align: center"][h=4]The Competitive Fit[/h][/TH]
[TH="align: center"][h=4]The Eddy Fit[/h][/TH]
[TH="align: center"][h=4]The French Fit[/h][/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: left"]Seat tube range c-c[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]51.8 - 52.3[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]53.0 - 53.5[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]54.7 - 55.2[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="class: alt, bgcolor: #F5F5F5"]
[TD="class: left"]Seat tube range c-t[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]53.4 - 53.9[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]54.6 - 55.1[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]56.3 - 56.8[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: left"]Top tube length[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]52.7 - 53.1[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]52.7 - 53.1[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]53.9 - 54.3[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="class: alt, bgcolor: #F5F5F5"]
[TD="class: left"]Stem Length[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]10.7 - 11.3[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]9.6 - 10.2[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]9.8 - 10.4[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: left"]BB-Saddle Position[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]68.4 - 70.4[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]67.6 - 69.6[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]65.9 - 67.9[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="class: alt, bgcolor: #F5F5F5"]
[TD="class: left"]Saddle-Handlebar[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]50.7 - 51.3[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]51.5 - 52.1[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]53.2 - 53.8[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: left"]Saddle Setback[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]4.3 - 4.7[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]5.5 - 5.9[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]5.0 - 5.4[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

Last edited by fishix; 02-20-13 at 06:52 PM. Reason: New bike fit
fishix is offline  
Old 02-20-13, 06:27 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
kite991's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Newark, CA/Sacramento, CA
Posts: 149

Bikes: Leader 725, Kilo tt

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have a Kilo TT and I love it, I've only changed out the handle bars, the stock 16t cog, and pedals. I love the look of the bike, its sleek, and it does seem at least for most people I know that the fitting for the bike is 2cm shorter than on a different bike, ive ridden on a 49 before, but the kilo tt I bought was a 47 and it fits me just right. I probably should get myself fitted for a bike properly (maybe this weekend i can measure myself).

Talked to a guy at a LBS who owned a kilo tt before I decided on the purchase, and he also helped me determine which size to get.

On a side note, where are you commuting around in the bay area?
kite991 is offline  
Old 02-20-13, 07:02 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
SpeshulEd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 8,088
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 686 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by az_andrew
when will these posts end
It's because when people google reviews or "what size should I get" this forum along with a few others pop up...so people join and ask the question over and over again without searching or using a fit calculator.

Could just make a sticky, "so you're buying a bikesdirect bike" with the fit calculator and links to the longer bikesdirect bike posts - throw the windsor hour post in there, the kilo post, etc.

Then when someone asks, just post the link to the sticky and the mods can close the thread.
SpeshulEd is offline  
Old 02-20-13, 07:36 PM
  #12  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 13
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quite the opposite. I googled a bunch of things and, if you read my original post, I did not just go, "Hey, bikeforums! This looks cool and I should just join and post a question." I spent the whole last night and half of today going through the threads, not counting hours here and there this past week.

A lot of time I see conflicting responses, and some questions ware not answered, or (I think this is the most common scenerio) people just think their circumstances might be different than older posts (which might or might not be the case). I know the fit, but I wondered how it will make a difference in the area I'm riding, etc.

I think this is a great forum and a lot of experienced riders out there want to share their experiences. I'm sorry if this little thread costs you one scroll more to get to the post you want. Just thought it might be also helpful to others as well.
fishix is offline  
Old 02-20-13, 07:38 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
seanifred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Bay Area/Davis, CA
Posts: 394
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
where are you a student? just curious
seanifred is offline  
Old 02-20-13, 07:43 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Jandro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 3,059
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by fishix
A lot of time I see conflicting responses, and some questions ware not answered, or (I think this is the most common scenerio) people just think their circumstances might be different than older posts (which might or might not be the case). I know the fit, but I wondered how it will make a difference in the area I'm riding, etc.

I think this is a great forum and a lot of experienced riders out there want to share their experiences. I'm sorry if this little thread costs you one scroll more to get to the post you want. Just thought it might be also helpful to others as well.
Good fit is good fit is good fit. There is no difference between a good fit in one region and a good fit in another region.

There is a difference between a relaxed fit (typically more upright/cruiser style), performance fit (this is the most common), and a TT fit (aggressive - not applicable here).

Sounds like you want a cruiser, basically, so you're looking at a more upright/relaxed fit. Typically you want to err on the side of a larger frame for this as smaller, more compact frame geometry lends itself to a more aggressive fit.
__________________
Attack in the feeling because it says I'll win absolutely.
Jandro is offline  
Old 02-20-13, 07:44 PM
  #15  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 13
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
@kite991 and @seanifred, I'm around Palo Alto area.

Seems like a lot of yes to the Kilo TT. Might go ahead with that then...
fishix is offline  
Old 02-20-13, 07:47 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
seanifred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Bay Area/Davis, CA
Posts: 394
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
alright, hope it fits you well.
seanifred is offline  
Old 02-20-13, 08:17 PM
  #17  
Banned
 
BoSoxYacht's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: take your time, enjoy the scenery, it will be there when you get to it
Posts: 7,281

Bikes: 07 IRO BFGB fixed-gear, 07 Pedal Force RS

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Jandro
Sounds like you want a cruiser, basically, so you're looking at a more upright/relaxed fit. Typically you want to err on the side of a larger frame for this as smaller, more compact frame geometry lends itself to a more aggressive fit.


Are you trying to confuse the OP?
BoSoxYacht is offline  
Old 02-20-13, 08:27 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Jandro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 3,059
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by BoSoxYacht


Are you trying to confuse the OP?
No?

What part of that was confusing?
__________________
Attack in the feeling because it says I'll win absolutely.
Jandro is offline  
Old 02-20-13, 08:34 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
SSbalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Baltimore MD
Posts: 241
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Give the Windsor Hour a gander - its in the same price range(cheaper, actually) and from what I've been told it has a more relaxed geometry(easier on the back). I've had one for about a year and a half and I love it.

Best of luck, for short jaunts like that I think you would be happy either way you go.
SSbalt is offline  
Old 02-20-13, 08:38 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
SpeshulEd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 8,088
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 686 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by fishix
Quite the opposite. I googled a bunch of things and, if you read my original post, I did not just go, "Hey, bikeforums! This looks cool and I should just join and post a question." I spent the whole last night and half of today going through the threads, not counting hours here and there this past week.

A lot of time I see conflicting responses, and some questions ware not answered, or (I think this is the most common scenerio) people just think their circumstances might be different than older posts (which might or might not be the case). I know the fit, but I wondered how it will make a difference in the area I'm riding, etc.

I think this is a great forum and a lot of experienced riders out there want to share their experiences. I'm sorry if this little thread costs you one scroll more to get to the post you want. Just thought it might be also helpful to others as well.
Not ripping on you, just saying there are a lot of threads that pop up similar to this.

For example, this thread was posted 45 minutes prior to yours:
https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...around-300-400
SpeshulEd is offline  
Old 02-20-13, 08:55 PM
  #21  
Banned
 
BoSoxYacht's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: take your time, enjoy the scenery, it will be there when you get to it
Posts: 7,281

Bikes: 07 IRO BFGB fixed-gear, 07 Pedal Force RS

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Jandro
No?

What part of that was confusing?
The larger vs smaller frame comparison.

How is the larger bike going to be more "relaxed"? The bigger bike will have a longer TT and stem, making the rider's reach longer.

If the rider wants a more relaxed/upright position, he should get a cruiser/townie, not a different size .
BoSoxYacht is offline  
Old 02-20-13, 09:44 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Jandro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 3,059
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by BoSoxYacht
The larger vs smaller frame comparison.

How is the larger bike going to be more "relaxed"? The bigger bike will have a longer TT and stem, making the rider's reach longer.

If the rider wants a more relaxed/upright position, he should get a cruiser/townie, not a different size .
If he is set on the bikes in his OP, then it would be better for him to go err on the side of larger for a couple reasons:

-taller head tube (not necessarily a longer stem)
-lower saddle height relative to top tube. The smaller you go, the more compact the geometry gets and you have to compensate.

It's just something to keep in mind, especially if you are between sizes. You're right in that a townie would be best but given the choices he gave us, that was my suggestion.
__________________
Attack in the feeling because it says I'll win absolutely.
Jandro is offline  
Old 02-20-13, 10:52 PM
  #23  
Still kicking.
 
Dannihilator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Annandale, New Jersey
Posts: 19,678

Bikes: Bike Count: Rising.

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 159 Post(s)
Liked 46 Times in 32 Posts
So basically the french fit, which would be good for commuting. It's on a larger frame where that setup allows a more upright stance.
__________________
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
Dannihilator is offline  
Old 02-21-13, 02:38 AM
  #24  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 13
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks so much for your advise/suggestions, guys! I just got a Kilo TT Pro 53cm in white!
fishix is offline  
Old 02-21-13, 03:11 AM
  #25  
Painfully average.
 
calv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,304

Bikes: Caad10 / All-City SP

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Nice. I had a white Kilo TT Pro once. It was awesome.
calv is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.