Suggestions for a fat tubed Cinelli Vigorelli style frame for a street build?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,264
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 89 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times
in
10 Posts
Suggestions for a fat tubed Cinelli Vigorelli style frame for a street build?
Been sorta taken with Cinelli Vigorelli frames. Don't necessarily need something that high end but wanted that look of fat tubes but not extreme geometry. Also not super taken with the colorways lately. Anything else like that which would make a nice street build. Extra points for less graphics.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,776
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Leader 735/State undefeated(?)/Visp if you can find one/Averting makes something too.
Out of all those, go with the leader, it's the least awful and minimal graphics.
Out of all those, go with the leader, it's the least awful and minimal graphics.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,264
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 89 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times
in
10 Posts
Does the Vigorelli have less track-ish geometry than the Mash Bolt and other frames with downsloping top tubes? Looks like the Vig has a non-sloping top tube.
#4
Your cog is slipping.
#6
Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Southeast San Diego, CA
Posts: 34
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The Vigorelli actually has a more traditional/classic track geometry than the Mash frames. Also, the top tube slopes toward the rear slightly. The Mash Bolt and Histogram were designed with aggressive street riding and racing in mind. They can work well on the track as well, depending on your geometry preferences and physical abilities. They're not UCI compliant though. The new Mash Parallax is said to be UCI compliant, though. It has a more aggressive modern track geometry compared to the Vigorelli.
#8
Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Southeast San Diego, CA
Posts: 34
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The forward sloping top tube and the seat tube angle. Possibly the head tube angle as well, but I'm not sure. From what I've read, the Parallax basically is supposed to resolve these issues.
Oh yeah, I was referring to the Mash Bolt and Histogram as being non UCI compliant, not the Vig. From what I understand, the Vig is UCI compliant.
Oh yeah, I was referring to the Mash Bolt and Histogram as being non UCI compliant, not the Vig. From what I understand, the Vig is UCI compliant.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,610
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 399 Post(s)
Liked 274 Times
in
136 Posts
I am confused...will anybody here, including the OP and also previous posters in this thread, please tell me - what does "fat tubed Cinelli Vigorelli style frame for a street build" actually mean?
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: PHL
Posts: 9,948
Bikes: Litespeed Catalyst, IRO Rob Roy, All City Big Block
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1332 Post(s)
Liked 398 Times
in
194 Posts
The forward sloping top tube and the seat tube angle. Possibly the head tube angle as well, but I'm not sure. From what I've read, the Parallax basically is supposed to resolve these issues.
Oh yeah, I was referring to the Mash Bolt and Histogram as being non UCI compliant, not the Vig. From what I understand, the Vig is UCI compliant.
Oh yeah, I was referring to the Mash Bolt and Histogram as being non UCI compliant, not the Vig. From what I understand, the Vig is UCI compliant.
#12
Your cog is slipping.
He wants an aluminum frame with fat tubes similar to those found on the Vigorelli without paying Cinelli money.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: St Louis
Posts: 1,846
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Raise your hand if you have actually read the UCI rulebook. Hi carleton, lets high five.
The UCI gives no crap about tube angles. And even more importantly until you the to the UCI cup race this Nov. in LA, all American cycling gives no craps about UCI.
The UCI gives no crap about tube angles. And even more importantly until you the to the UCI cup race this Nov. in LA, all American cycling gives no craps about UCI.
#15
Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Southeast San Diego, CA
Posts: 34
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
As far as I know (and feel free to correct me if I'm wrong), none of those things have anything to do with UCI regulations.
#16
Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Southeast San Diego, CA
Posts: 34
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thank you for the clarification. I tried to read the UCI regulations once, but didn't have the time or patience. A lot of it had me going, "huh?" Decided to read it some other time, as none of it presently applies to me. Haha!
Last edited by rocferd; 09-25-13 at 03:21 PM.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: St Louis
Posts: 1,846
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
USAC rules are more important, and a bit easier to read. But in reality they are only a guideline that officials and promoters go by. This is even more true in track racing, than in road. There is also a newer body of organizing called ATRA that a lot of tracks are moving towards. Track cycling is an uncared about off shoot for USAC, so a bunch of really awesome trackies got together and created a track focused group. Their rules actually make sense.
Also, Thunderdome.
Also, Thunderdome.
#18
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,264
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 89 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times
in
10 Posts
So basically, the Vigarelli, although the only one that is actually designed for track use, has less aggressive geometry than the Mash frames that are designed to be used on the street.
Yeah, the forward sloping top tube is a no go. Actually want something with more relaxed geometry rather than more aggressive geometry but really like the fatter tubes and shorter top tube length for street.
Looking for this sort of build (sans ugly colors and logos) that many people hate:
Yeah, the forward sloping top tube is a no go. Actually want something with more relaxed geometry rather than more aggressive geometry but really like the fatter tubes and shorter top tube length for street.
Looking for this sort of build (sans ugly colors and logos) that many people hate:
#19
Veteran Racer
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Ciudad de Vacas, Tejas
Posts: 11,757
Bikes: 32 frames + 80 wheels
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1331 Post(s)
Liked 764 Times
in
431 Posts
USAC rules are more important, and a bit easier to read. But in reality they are only a guideline that officials and promoters go by. This is even more true in track racing, than in road. There is also a newer body of organizing called ATRA that a lot of tracks are moving towards. Track cycling is an uncared about off shoot for USAC, so a bunch of really awesome trackies got together and created a track focused group. Their rules actually make sense.
#20
Your cog is slipping.
#23
Senior Member
Dawes SST
https://www.bikesdirect.com/products/..._al_carb_x.htm
Complete bike for about half the price of a MASH frame.
If I had this bike I would probably swap the bars,stem,post,saddle and tires.pretty sure that everthing else will handle high mileage use.
https://www.bikesdirect.com/products/..._al_carb_x.htm
Complete bike for about half the price of a MASH frame.
If I had this bike I would probably swap the bars,stem,post,saddle and tires.pretty sure that everthing else will handle high mileage use.
#24
derpin'
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 401
Bikes: 2014 Stainless Steel Firefly
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
if you don't want to pay "cinelli money", what are you willing to spend?
also, in my experience, a full on aluminum track frame isn't that comfortable on the streets... it's great when pavement is super smooth, but for many of us, that's not the case. Carbon forks and steerer tubes can help negate this a bit.
I'd check out some steel offerings too.
also, in my experience, a full on aluminum track frame isn't that comfortable on the streets... it's great when pavement is super smooth, but for many of us, that's not the case. Carbon forks and steerer tubes can help negate this a bit.
I'd check out some steel offerings too.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 1,771
Bikes: AristoNYC's PedalRoom
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 130 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
Been sorta taken with Cinelli Vigorelli frames. Don't necessarily need something that high end but wanted that look of fat tubes but not extreme geometry. Also not super taken with the colorways lately. Anything else like that which would make a nice street build. Extra points for less graphics.
Not sure of the quality of that frame but is that something your looking for style wise?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
spinachface
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
8
03-21-17 05:22 PM