Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Member gogotheyogrtman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Twin Cities
    My Bikes
    Mercier Kilo TT 2013, custom BMX 2010-2012, Vintage Fuji fixed-gear conversion 1978, vintage fuji sports 12 1986, Bianchi XL ev2 2001
    Posts
    47
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Gates carbon belt drive

    is it worth it?
    The sound of a car door opening in front of you is similar to the sound of a gun being cocked.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    2,704
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quite.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Bat56's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    St.Paul, MN
    Posts
    1,700
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Depends

  4. #4
    Senior Member Philasteve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,137
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Do you use a normal cog on the back for belt drives?

  5. #5
    Senior Member Bat56's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    St.Paul, MN
    Posts
    1,700
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    No

  6. #6
    Senior Member Philasteve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,137
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I vote no then, it doesn't seem like it's worth the cost and there's not much versatility. I just looked up the price and the first cog i saw was $82 gtfo.

  7. #7
    Senior Member SmallFront's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Copenhagen, Denmark
    My Bikes
    Bullitt Milk Plus with Alfine 11s; Dahon Smooth Hound
    Posts
    404
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I don't see the purpose of those things, except on "casual" bikes. But then again, if you carry your bike up and down narrow stairs, it might be just the ticket. So, as with others here, I'd say "it depends".

  8. #8
    7-speed doomsday prepper ThermionicScott's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    CID
    My Bikes
    1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX
    Posts
    10,294
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Philasteve View Post
    I vote no then, it doesn't seem like it's worth the cost and there's not much versatility. I just looked up the price and the first cog i saw was $82 gtfo.
    If the belt lasts longer than several chains, and doesn't wear down the sprockets as fast, that's where the pricing would even out.
    Quote Originally Posted by chandltp View Post
    There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
    RUSA #7498

    ISO: 49T 130BCD 3/32" road chainring, preferably silver and classic-styled.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Grambo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    S.E. Chester County PA
    My Bikes
    IF Ti Crown Jewel, Moots Mooto X RSL 29er, Fat Chance Yo Eddy, Lynskey Pro Cross
    Posts
    566
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The main advantage of belt drive is the system is virtually no maintenance. Unlike a chain it never needs to be cleaned or lubricated and wont rust. When properly adjusted it also has less friction than a chain drive system It is also very quiet. The downsides are the belts can only be used with internally geared hubs (Rohloff for example) but that is obviously not an issue for SSFG. You must also have a frame that is specifically designed for belt drive. The rear triangle must have a joint / break in it so the belt can be threaded in (unlike a chain it is one continuous piece that cannot be broken or adjusted in length). I also believe that in certain instances if you want to change your rear cog you must also change the belt given the belt is synchronized to the teeth of the cog. It definitely has advantages in certain applications (harsh, muddy wet conditions) but as you can see there are downsides as well.

  10. #10
    Senior Member hockeyteeth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Gainesville, Florida
    Posts
    1,821
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It's ridiculous to me. The belt needs a good bit of tension to keep from slipping and this provides noticeable drag and inefficiency in the drivetrain. The couple bikes I have ridden were not as quiet as the marketing leads you to believe, either. One of our customers even switched back from belt to chain-drive after noticing the same shortcomings. I was once quite curious about it, but no longer care to ride it. There is even a specified procedure for removing a new, coiled belt from its packaging to avoid kinking it and causing it to fail. Dumb.

    Also, your posts suck, Mr. yogurtslinger. Lurk more.

  11. #11
    Blaster of Reality Scrodzilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    25,158
    Mentioned
    37 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

  12. #12
    Senior Member Philasteve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,137
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    For the same price to get a belt system up and running I could get any crankset I desire'd. I use budget Andel cranks and a $12 chain, and I don't see any cons as to what i'm using now. I don't mind wiping my chain off and spraying some lube on it every few weeks. Those belt drive systems and dumber than me.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •