Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
Reload this Page >

Single speed 12T freewheel?

Search
Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

Single speed 12T freewheel?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-24-14, 11:26 AM
  #26  
Car-free in the South
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: SFCA
Posts: 295

Bikes: Surly Pack Rat, Novara Trionfo retro-mod

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Fiveflat
Hate to hijack even more. bcd?
What's the difference between my 46/14 and a 52/xx as long as the ratio is the same? Obviously I want a lower ratio but just curious why you say small on a commuter is ridiculous?
More teeth to hook the chain, less likely to sheer something or drop a chain. That's the only benefit I can think of, mechanically. I also find larger cogs/rings to give a more solid and smooth rotation.
robyr is offline  
Old 02-24-14, 11:32 AM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
SpeshulEd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 8,088
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 686 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Fiveflat
bcd?
https://sheldonbrown.com/cribsheet-bcd.html
__________________
Hey guys, lets go play bikes! Strava

SpeshulEd is offline  
Old 02-25-14, 09:37 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Denver Colorado
Posts: 97

Bikes: Surly steam roller, bear knukle,big block, fbm sword, litespeed swobo sanches

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
52 x 17 is not that bad.
Denver is pretty flat for the most part until you start going to the foothills
I rode a 48x15 for a long time on my 36 mile round trip every day commute, I do have an oh **** stick.
Just recently changed it to a 48x 17
Best change I have made in a long time.
Live and let live.
Surly2698 is offline  
Old 02-25-14, 10:51 PM
  #29  
Still kicking.
 
Dannihilator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Annandale, New Jersey
Posts: 19,659

Bikes: Bike Count: Rising.

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 159 Post(s)
Liked 46 Times in 32 Posts
Originally Posted by TheOutdoorsman
Hi, I have a 38T crankset with a 16T freewheel. It is too slow for me, my legs want to go faster than my wheel will turn. So I am looking for possibly a 12T. Anyone recommend any? Thanks
Change chainring instead that way you don't have to switch to a bmx hub with the proper threading. Also seeing that bmx hubs and frames are 110mm instead of 120 and may have larger axles in diameter than what you would find of a ss/track hub, you'll also have the great pleasure of having a drivetrain with an incredibly bad chainline.
__________________
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
Dannihilator is offline  
Old 02-26-14, 09:30 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
Bat56's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: St.Paul, MN
Posts: 1,822
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by robyr
...dumbassery... I commute everyday, 16miles round trip, from Aurora to Lodo:


You ride that thing in the ice and snow? Because hell yes I want to see that.
Bat56 is offline  
Old 02-26-14, 11:01 PM
  #31  
GMJ
Would you just look at it
 
GMJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,554

Bikes: good ones.

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 2 Posts
I have never understood the hate for high gears here. If someone is well within their riding capabilities to responsibly regulate their speed and prefers low RPMs, then there should not be any problem. I've been commuting on my Cross Check as of late, but last year I commuted on 48x14, every day, 11mi each way with decent elevation change.

I'm not trying to brag here because I do not see it as anything extraordinary. What is surprising to me is the strong adverse reaction to high gears. Its starting to teeter on snobbery.
GMJ is offline  
Old 02-26-14, 11:49 PM
  #32  
Car-free in the South
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: SFCA
Posts: 295

Bikes: Surly Pack Rat, Novara Trionfo retro-mod

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Bat56
You ride that thing in the ice and snow? Because hell yes I want to see that.
YOU may not be able to ride in the snow, but if thats true you must just push your bike around St. Paul in the winter to look cool.

I don't have a car, so its this or a ****ty 1.5 hour train/bus journey. Yeah, I ride in the snow on this bike, which is my only bike since I left my cargo bike with my parents in SC when we moved. Sorry thats so unbelievable to you.

PS: I rode in the snow and ice just this morning and just rode home from the office. Wow, so unbelievable.
robyr is offline  
Old 02-26-14, 11:49 PM
  #33  
Car-free in the South
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: SFCA
Posts: 295

Bikes: Surly Pack Rat, Novara Trionfo retro-mod

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by GMJ
I have never understood the hate for high gears here. If someone is well within their riding capabilities to responsibly regulate their speed and prefers low RPMs, then there should not be any problem. I've been commuting on my Cross Check as of late, but last year I commuted on 48x14, every day, 11mi each way with decent elevation change.

I'm not trying to brag here because I do not see it as anything extraordinary. What is surprising to me is the strong adverse reaction to high gears. Its starting to teeter on snobbery.
Thank you, it's not even that big of a gear for christ's sake. I've never, ever, had to walk it. Even on my ride up Mt. Carbon and back down on my way to Red Rocks.
robyr is offline  
Old 02-27-14, 08:41 AM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
Bat56's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: St.Paul, MN
Posts: 1,822
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by robyr
YOU may not be able to ride in the snow, but if thats true you must just push your bike around St. Paul in the winter to look cool.

I don't have a car, so its this or a ****ty 1.5 hour train/bus journey. Yeah, I ride in the snow on this bike, which is my only bike since I left my cargo bike with my parents in SC when we moved. Sorry thats so unbelievable to you.

PS: I rode in the snow and ice just this morning and just rode home from the office. Wow, so unbelievable.
I ride my bike everyday. It's a 26er with studded tires and a front brake. The regular setup is 36x16 and when I might encounter snow I put a wheel with an 18t on the back.

I want video of you riding that bike up any incline though at least three inches of snow.

I am not saying you are lying, I am saying you are the f'ing man and mad props to you so please share.
Bat56 is offline  
Old 02-27-14, 09:45 AM
  #35  
Car-free in the South
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: SFCA
Posts: 295

Bikes: Surly Pack Rat, Novara Trionfo retro-mod

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Bat56
I ride my bike everyday. It's a 26er with studded tires and a front brake. The regular setup is 36x16 and when I might encounter snow I put a wheel with an 18t on the back.

I want video of you riding that bike up any incline though at least three inches of snow.

I am not saying you are lying, I am saying you are the f'ing man and mad props to you so please share.
I'll get a decent video next time we get some snow (probably later this week honestly.) For now, this is the only decent "snow shot" I have. This was after riding to our current watering hole. Definitely before the plows got out there haha:

Attached Images
robyr is offline  
Old 02-27-14, 10:43 AM
  #36  
Old fart
 
JohnDThompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,786

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3588 Post(s)
Liked 3,400 Times in 1,934 Posts
Originally Posted by robyr
More teeth to hook the chain, less likely to sheer something or drop a chain. That's the only benefit I can think of, mechanically.
Spreads the wear over more teeth as well, so the parts last longer.
JohnDThompson is offline  
Old 03-04-14, 12:24 PM
  #37  
enginerd
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: MKE
Posts: 729

Bikes: officially too many now...

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 90 Post(s)
Liked 127 Times in 42 Posts
Short answer: you want 72-74 gear inches. Get a 44T chainring.
EnzoRWD is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
elmore leonard
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
12
11-26-15 04:31 PM
44frostedflakes
Bicycle Mechanics
7
09-30-14 04:01 PM
rebelLT
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
7
11-03-13 09:34 AM
dbakl
Classic & Vintage
2
03-11-13 08:31 AM
Myosmith
Bicycle Mechanics
4
10-10-11 09:04 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.