someone brought this up a bit ago.... before we can make a stickie thread with the info.... we need to figure out what and how we want to rate!
i think things like route (scenic? traffic? too many stop lights/signs? etc), sag foods, sag vehicles, after ride meal (if provided), etc....
then we can either start a discussion thread (or use this one) to gather the ratings.... maybe put in quotes, etc.... but keep the actual "rating" thread kinda clean.... with just the individual rides rated in it?
what do ya all think? talk to me!!!!!
i moved my post from down below to up here!
that sounds good! than i can cut and paste the ratings/comments into the stickied rate thread!....Originally Posted by mateo44
i wonder though... rather than trying to average everyone's ratings.... just cut and past that part too? (discussing this... mateo has said he can do the output of everyone input for the averages)
we could set up a template.... so everyone's would look the same.... (or if we average the input.... we can take the comments from the discussion and add them?????? so we'd have one set of averages... but several comments... giving credit to the author??????)
so far we have (i added a couple.... input?) UPDATED with other input
ride name (self explainatory)
ride description (mostly often taken from the website)
link to site if available
cost lotsa dollars! lol! if prices differ per length... can probably combine cost and length
ride lengths different course lengths offeres
clarity of route (markings or route slip): 1-5
difficulty (hilly/flat?): 1-5
overall satisfaction: 1-5