Bicycle licence?
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 46
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Bicycle licence?
The recent LACBC email says the LAPD are ticketing cyclists for not having a bicycle licence, California Vehicle Code (LAMC 26.01).
Anyone have any additional information? Is there a $ fine? Is this for real?
Anyone have any additional information? Is there a $ fine? Is this for real?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Grass Valley, CA
Posts: 2,544
Bikes: Time RXRS, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
See the following link. The city of Los Angeles has a license requirements available at retailers (see bottom of page).
https://www.bicyclela.org/law.htm
It is kind of vague. Does it mean only for bikes purchased in Los Angeles, or for all bikes riding in LA?
I would find it stupid in the latter case as a rider traveling from Santa Monica to LA may have no clue of such license. It would also mean that we would have to check the laws in each town we are planning to ride for such licenses. So I guess if a cop in LA ask you for your license just tell him/her that you bought your bike in a different city.
https://www.bicyclela.org/law.htm
It is kind of vague. Does it mean only for bikes purchased in Los Angeles, or for all bikes riding in LA?
I would find it stupid in the latter case as a rider traveling from Santa Monica to LA may have no clue of such license. It would also mean that we would have to check the laws in each town we are planning to ride for such licenses. So I guess if a cop in LA ask you for your license just tell him/her that you bought your bike in a different city.
Last edited by gpelpel; 10-10-08 at 10:53 AM.
#3
aka. vertical jon
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Anaheim, Home of the Los Angeles? Angels of Anaheim... in Orange County?
Posts: 768
Bikes: White Carbon Token, Cannondale Mtn, 1975 Peugeot UO-8 Golden Fixed Conversion
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
39002. (a) A city or county, which adopts a bicycle licensing
ordinance or resolution, (which LA does) may provide in the ordinance or resolution
that no resident shall operate any bicycle, .....,
unless the bicycle is licensed in accordance with this division.
That's pretty clear, in any case the fine is only $10.
ordinance or resolution, (which LA does) may provide in the ordinance or resolution
that no resident shall operate any bicycle, .....,
unless the bicycle is licensed in accordance with this division.
That's pretty clear, in any case the fine is only $10.
#4
This is Shangri La
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 724
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#7
Time Trialist & Duathlete
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Claremont, CA
Posts: 160
Bikes: Custom built road bike & custom built TT bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It is kind of vague. Does it mean only for bikes purchased in Los Angeles, or for all bikes riding in LA?
I would find it stupid in the latter case as a rider traveling from Santa Monica to LA may have no clue of such license. It would also mean that we would have to check the laws in each town we are planning to ride for such licenses. So I guess if a cop in LA ask you for your license just tell him/her that you bought your bike in a different city.
I would find it stupid in the latter case as a rider traveling from Santa Monica to LA may have no clue of such license. It would also mean that we would have to check the laws in each town we are planning to ride for such licenses. So I guess if a cop in LA ask you for your license just tell him/her that you bought your bike in a different city.
Bottom line with this, don't ride in LA.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 148
Bikes: Super6, Highball, BSB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#11
So Cal North County Rider
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North County San Diego
Posts: 170
Bikes: 2008 Giant OCR2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
+1
The law is written poorly and can be fought if need be.
Sale of Bicycles (LAMC 80,75) Prohibits the sale or rental of bicycles from any public or private property which is not the place of business of a duly licensed bicycle dealer.
Now this one is a bit more interesting seeing as how many ppl sell bikes on craigslist.
The law is written poorly and can be fought if need be.
Sale of Bicycles (LAMC 80,75) Prohibits the sale or rental of bicycles from any public or private property which is not the place of business of a duly licensed bicycle dealer.
Now this one is a bit more interesting seeing as how many ppl sell bikes on craigslist.
#12
Time Trialist & Duathlete
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Claremont, CA
Posts: 160
Bikes: Custom built road bike & custom built TT bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#13
I love my bike
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Stevenson Ranch, CA
Posts: 143
Bikes: 09 Orbea Onix TDA in white, Trek 4300
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Define "city" of Los Angeles. It's pretty dang big. Are we talking all the cities within the city itself like Chatsworth (where I work) and the entire SFV, or just downtown? The SFV is still technically the city by map. Bunch of BS personally considering the larger volume of bicycles now being ridden all over (which is probably part of the reason in the first place). Another way to make a dollar from the people trying to save one. What's next, needing a license to walk?
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 942
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It's an archaic Los Angeles municipal code that hasn't been enforced in any meaningful way for decades, if ever. Very few bike shops include licenses with new bicycles, as they are technically required to do under that law (I've never been offered one), and quite a few LAPD stations, which are supposed to have them on hand, do not--and sometimes the desk sergeant won't even know what you're talking about if you ask about it, as some folks have been doing over the last month or so since word of the recent citations got out.
So why are we even talking about this? Long story short: a couple of LAPD Central Division officers used it as a weapon during an incident on a group ride last month when some cyclists questioned the way officers were treating another cyclist whom they had detained and handcuffed. When the onlookers asserted their right to observe and videotape the scene, Officer R. Alvarez and his colleagues, apparently unable to counter their argument, began to go over their bicycles in search of something--anything--to cite them for. Thus it came to pass that (probably) the first bike license tickets in Los Angeles since the Nixon Administration were issued. The citations also included written warnings for alleged violations of 21210 VC ("Bikes blocking ped traffic on sidewalk"), even though it was near midnight on Main Street in downtown LA and the only people on the sidewalk for blocks were the cyclists and the officers.
Oldest cop trick in the book, in other words. A motivated police officer can almost always find something to cite the operator of a car, truck, or bicycle for. That's what happened last month, and word gets around quick in the urban cycling community these days.
I don't really think there's a crackdown going on. It's just a matter of some LAPD officers being aware of an ancient, almost universally ignored law, and being willing to use it aggressively against people who offer them any backtalk. In any case, it's as good a reason as any to lean on the City Council to take LA's mandatory bike licensing law out behind the barn and put it out of its misery.
So why are we even talking about this? Long story short: a couple of LAPD Central Division officers used it as a weapon during an incident on a group ride last month when some cyclists questioned the way officers were treating another cyclist whom they had detained and handcuffed. When the onlookers asserted their right to observe and videotape the scene, Officer R. Alvarez and his colleagues, apparently unable to counter their argument, began to go over their bicycles in search of something--anything--to cite them for. Thus it came to pass that (probably) the first bike license tickets in Los Angeles since the Nixon Administration were issued. The citations also included written warnings for alleged violations of 21210 VC ("Bikes blocking ped traffic on sidewalk"), even though it was near midnight on Main Street in downtown LA and the only people on the sidewalk for blocks were the cyclists and the officers.
Oldest cop trick in the book, in other words. A motivated police officer can almost always find something to cite the operator of a car, truck, or bicycle for. That's what happened last month, and word gets around quick in the urban cycling community these days.
I don't really think there's a crackdown going on. It's just a matter of some LAPD officers being aware of an ancient, almost universally ignored law, and being willing to use it aggressively against people who offer them any backtalk. In any case, it's as good a reason as any to lean on the City Council to take LA's mandatory bike licensing law out behind the barn and put it out of its misery.
__________________
Simplistic Ideologies R Coffins
Simplistic Ideologies R Coffins
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 7,085
Bikes: Cervelo Prodigy
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 478 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 87 Times
in
67 Posts
Go to Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa on this. There are many Latino riders who use their bikes to go to work.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,329
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Times are hard and cities are looking for any legal means to balance their budgets. Issuing speeding and parking tickets have been always popular. With increased bike traffic and higher bike thief rates because of the high fuel prices, it's natural the local governments started targeting cyclists.
In one respect, it may be a good thing to pay the $3-10 and be in the statewide system just in case someone steals your bike and it's good for 3 years. Just shop around to find the lowest price. Santa Monica is popular for it's $3 fee and you can just mail it in instead of having to show up personally with your bike or waiting for the 'right weekend' for the local LAPD station to announce they are registering bikes that day or going to some campus and paying $7-10 (unless you went/like that school and want their logo on your bike). Bike licenses are recognized and accepted as valid by other cities and counties.
Edit to add:
https://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d16_7/vc39002.htm
License Requirement
39002.
(a) A city or county, which adopts a bicycle licensing ordinance or resolution, may provide in the ordinance or resolution that no resident shall operate any bicycle, as specified in the ordinance, on any street, road, highway, or other public property within the jurisdiction of the city or county, as the case may be, unless the bicycle is licensed in accordance with this division.
(b) It is unlawful for any person to tamper with, destroy, mutilate, or alter any license indicia or registration form, or to remove, alter, or mutilate the serial number, or the identifying marks of a licensing agency's identifying symbol, on any bicycle frame licensed under this division.
Amended Sec. 8, Ch. 674, Stats. 1996. Effective January 1, 1997.
In one respect, it may be a good thing to pay the $3-10 and be in the statewide system just in case someone steals your bike and it's good for 3 years. Just shop around to find the lowest price. Santa Monica is popular for it's $3 fee and you can just mail it in instead of having to show up personally with your bike or waiting for the 'right weekend' for the local LAPD station to announce they are registering bikes that day or going to some campus and paying $7-10 (unless you went/like that school and want their logo on your bike). Bike licenses are recognized and accepted as valid by other cities and counties.
Edit to add:
https://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d16_7/vc39002.htm
License Requirement
39002.
(a) A city or county, which adopts a bicycle licensing ordinance or resolution, may provide in the ordinance or resolution that no resident shall operate any bicycle, as specified in the ordinance, on any street, road, highway, or other public property within the jurisdiction of the city or county, as the case may be, unless the bicycle is licensed in accordance with this division.
(b) It is unlawful for any person to tamper with, destroy, mutilate, or alter any license indicia or registration form, or to remove, alter, or mutilate the serial number, or the identifying marks of a licensing agency's identifying symbol, on any bicycle frame licensed under this division.
Amended Sec. 8, Ch. 674, Stats. 1996. Effective January 1, 1997.
Last edited by Sci-Fi; 10-11-08 at 08:32 AM.
#17
Farmer tan
#18
Grammar Cop
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Papa Smurf's Lair
Posts: 1,543
Bikes: in my sig line
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Anaheim is $3 every two years and takes nothing more than a visit to your local fire station and a few minutes of time.
#19
Can't Re Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Wooster OH
Posts: 364
Bikes: 2009 Randonee, 2014 Bike Friday NWT
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
This passage from the Vehicle Code states that a city may make license rules for residents. A non-resident of LA could challenge the validity of the ordinance on that basis im(not speaking as a lawyer)ho.
39002. (a) A city or county, which adopts a bicycle licensing
ordinance or resolution, (which LA does) may provide in the ordinance or resolution
that no resident shall operate any bicycle, .....,
unless the bicycle is licensed in accordance with this division.
That's pretty clear, in any case the fine is only $10.
ordinance or resolution, (which LA does) may provide in the ordinance or resolution
that no resident shall operate any bicycle, .....,
unless the bicycle is licensed in accordance with this division.
That's pretty clear, in any case the fine is only $10.
__________________
Inside of a dog it's too dark to read.
Inside of a dog it's too dark to read.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 44
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Define "city" of Los Angeles. It's pretty dang big. Are we talking all the cities within the city itself like Chatsworth (where I work) and the entire SFV, or just downtown? The SFV is still technically the city by map. Bunch of BS personally considering the larger volume of bicycles now being ridden all over (which is probably part of the reason in the first place). Another way to make a dollar from the people trying to save one. What's next, needing a license to walk?
Chatsworth is not a city, but a neighborhood within the City of Los Angeles
Most of the SFV is part of the City of Los Angeles.
City of Los Angeles includes all these neighborhoods:
https://www.laalmanac.com/LA/lamap2.htm
#21
Body by Guinness
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 3,326
Bikes: Specialized Allez Pro; Cervelo P2 SL; Tsunami (Converted to Fixed Gear)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It's an archaic Los Angeles municipal code that hasn't been enforced in any meaningful way for decades, if ever. Very few bike shops include licenses with new bicycles, as they are technically required to do under that law (I've never been offered one), and quite a few LAPD stations, which are supposed to have them on hand, do not--and sometimes the desk sergeant won't even know what you're talking about if you ask about it, as some folks have been doing over the last month or so since word of the recent citations got out.
So why are we even talking about this? Long story short: a couple of LAPD Central Division officers used it as a weapon during an incident on a group ride last month when some cyclists questioned the way officers were treating another cyclist whom they had detained and handcuffed. When the onlookers asserted their right to observe and videotape the scene, Officer R. Alvarez and his colleagues, apparently unable to counter their argument, began to go over their bicycles in search of something--anything--to cite them for. Thus it came to pass that (probably) the first bike license tickets in Los Angeles since the Nixon Administration were issued. The citations also included written warnings for alleged violations of 21210 VC ("Bikes blocking ped traffic on sidewalk"), even though it was near midnight on Main Street in downtown LA and the only people on the sidewalk for blocks were the cyclists and the officers.
Oldest cop trick in the book, in other words. A motivated police officer can almost always find something to cite the operator of a car, truck, or bicycle for. That's what happened last month, and word gets around quick in the urban cycling community these days.
I don't really think there's a crackdown going on. It's just a matter of some LAPD officers being aware of an ancient, almost universally ignored law, and being willing to use it aggressively against people who offer them any backtalk. In any case, it's as good a reason as any to lean on the City Council to take LA's mandatory bike licensing law out behind the barn and put it out of its misery.
So why are we even talking about this? Long story short: a couple of LAPD Central Division officers used it as a weapon during an incident on a group ride last month when some cyclists questioned the way officers were treating another cyclist whom they had detained and handcuffed. When the onlookers asserted their right to observe and videotape the scene, Officer R. Alvarez and his colleagues, apparently unable to counter their argument, began to go over their bicycles in search of something--anything--to cite them for. Thus it came to pass that (probably) the first bike license tickets in Los Angeles since the Nixon Administration were issued. The citations also included written warnings for alleged violations of 21210 VC ("Bikes blocking ped traffic on sidewalk"), even though it was near midnight on Main Street in downtown LA and the only people on the sidewalk for blocks were the cyclists and the officers.
Oldest cop trick in the book, in other words. A motivated police officer can almost always find something to cite the operator of a car, truck, or bicycle for. That's what happened last month, and word gets around quick in the urban cycling community these days.
I don't really think there's a crackdown going on. It's just a matter of some LAPD officers being aware of an ancient, almost universally ignored law, and being willing to use it aggressively against people who offer them any backtalk. In any case, it's as good a reason as any to lean on the City Council to take LA's mandatory bike licensing law out behind the barn and put it out of its misery.
__________________
Fredo, you're my older brother and I love you...but don't ever take sides, with anyone, against the family again...ever.
Fredo, you're my older brother and I love you...but don't ever take sides, with anyone, against the family again...ever.
#23
well hello there
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Point Loma, CA
Posts: 15,430
Bikes: Bill Holland (Road-Ti), Fuji Roubaix Pro (back-up), Bike Friday (folder), Co-Motion (tandem) & Trek 750 (hybrid)
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 503 Post(s)
Liked 336 Times
in
206 Posts
No license for me. I don't need the extra weight.
__________________
.
.
Two wheels good. Four wheels bad.
.
.
Two wheels good. Four wheels bad.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sherman Oaks, CA
Posts: 94
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
This was being discussed by someone and there are in fact other vehicular codes that trump it, and therefore really out dated. I suggest you call your local councilmember and ask them why they allow archaic laws like this to exist. It is the equivalent to the roman language... dead., useless and not funded. It is my understanding that Councilman Zine stopped it from being deleted because he thinks that having the licenses will help cops located missing kids on bikes.