Switching out from rival to red...
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 200
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Switching out from rival to red...
What component would you switch out first when leaving rival and going to red...I cant do it all at once right now....Thanks all
#3
SuperGimp
I would do the shifters first, I believe that's where you'll notice the biggest difference (zero loss on both)
RD second, crank third, then brakes, then front der. The new yaw FD is cool, but I'm not sure you can install that as a stand alone item without the appropriate shifters.
Why do you want to upgrade? I have mostly force on my bike with red shifters and a red crank. The red crank is ONLY because fleabay was littered with them when the new red came out. $200 and the equivalent force cranks would have been $350. Ridiculous. In my opinion Red chainrings are frail little things, so when they inevitably wear out more quickly than you want and your shifting performance goes to heck in a hand basket, get some praxis rings or something like that.
But really, why switch?
RD second, crank third, then brakes, then front der. The new yaw FD is cool, but I'm not sure you can install that as a stand alone item without the appropriate shifters.
Why do you want to upgrade? I have mostly force on my bike with red shifters and a red crank. The red crank is ONLY because fleabay was littered with them when the new red came out. $200 and the equivalent force cranks would have been $350. Ridiculous. In my opinion Red chainrings are frail little things, so when they inevitably wear out more quickly than you want and your shifting performance goes to heck in a hand basket, get some praxis rings or something like that.
But really, why switch?
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 200
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I would do the shifters first, I believe that's where you'll notice the biggest difference (zero loss on both)
RD second, crank third, then brakes, then front der. The new yaw FD is cool, but I'm not sure you can install that as a stand alone item without the appropriate shifters.
Why do you want to upgrade? I have mostly force on my bike with red shifters and a red crank. The red crank is ONLY because fleabay was littered with them when the new red came out. $200 and the equivalent force cranks would have been $350. Ridiculous. In my opinion Red chainrings are frail little things, so when they inevitably wear out more quickly than you want and your shifting performance goes to heck in a hand basket, get some praxis rings or something like that.
But really, why switch?
RD second, crank third, then brakes, then front der. The new yaw FD is cool, but I'm not sure you can install that as a stand alone item without the appropriate shifters.
Why do you want to upgrade? I have mostly force on my bike with red shifters and a red crank. The red crank is ONLY because fleabay was littered with them when the new red came out. $200 and the equivalent force cranks would have been $350. Ridiculous. In my opinion Red chainrings are frail little things, so when they inevitably wear out more quickly than you want and your shifting performance goes to heck in a hand basket, get some praxis rings or something like that.
But really, why switch?
#5
SuperGimp
I think generally speaking Force has 99% of the functionality but weighs more. The shifters (and that yaw FD) are the only things that actually have a difference in function.
But yeah, if I were you and I didn't have garmin, I'd go there. That's the best cycling toy ever.
But yeah, if I were you and I didn't have garmin, I'd go there. That's the best cycling toy ever.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 345
Bikes: 2012 BMC SLR01, 2012 Yeti ASR5, 2013 Trek Crockett
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The first thing I would switch is the right shifter to get zero loss for the rear. Comparing rival to old red that's the main difference other than weight. When I was test riding bikes a few weeks ago I could notice the difference. I have rival on my current bike, and test rode a bike with old red.
If you are switching to old red with the titanium front derailleur cage, I would consider keeping the rival front derailleur.
If you are talking about new red I would put front deraileur, crank, and shifters at the top of the list in that order. The new front derailleur is supposed to be quite a bit better than the old one. The chainrings on the new crank are supposed also help improve the front shifting. The old shifters work fine, they just have an unnecessary trim position.
I should be building up my new frame this weekend with a complete new red groupset. If money was tight I probably would have ended up with force, with the new red front derailleur. And if I could afford to spend a little more I would have added the new red crank.
If you are switching to old red with the titanium front derailleur cage, I would consider keeping the rival front derailleur.
If you are talking about new red I would put front deraileur, crank, and shifters at the top of the list in that order. The new front derailleur is supposed to be quite a bit better than the old one. The chainrings on the new crank are supposed also help improve the front shifting. The old shifters work fine, they just have an unnecessary trim position.
I should be building up my new frame this weekend with a complete new red groupset. If money was tight I probably would have ended up with force, with the new red front derailleur. And if I could afford to spend a little more I would have added the new red crank.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Escondido CA
Posts: 152
Bikes: Jim Merz Specialized Allez, 3t bars, ritchey stem, turbo pro tires 130mm rear wheel
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
where are you located and what is the fate of your rival components?
#8
Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 35
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Ive always wanted red.But you know what,my lbs says im wasting my money.I have to respect such honesty.I realize im not a racer and i dont have the feel to even notice as i rode an all red bike yesterday and i couldn't feel any difference.Your point is well taken and that money could be used for a Garmin.
Last edited by SirVelo; 01-24-13 at 11:34 AM. Reason: added more info
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 200
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I think generally speaking Force has 99% of the functionality but weighs more. The shifters (and that yaw FD) are the only things that actually have a difference in function.
But yeah, if I were you and I didn't have garmin, I'd go there. That's the best cycling toy ever.
But yeah, if I were you and I didn't have garmin, I'd go there. That's the best cycling toy ever.
#11
SuperGimp
psalm is 95% right
If you want one that functions like your car GPS you need the big dog (700s or 800s should all do it) and you can input an address, and you'll get turn cues and a nice display.
The 500 has a very rudimentary navigation system - it's a true GPS but there's no address entry or even any maps. What you CAN do is create a track in say, ridewithgps.com, output the tcx file to garmin training center (software for your PC) and then upload the guidance to your garmin 500 or 510. You do get turn by turn navigation that way, although it tends to tell me to turn right as I'm missing the turn. You can also look at an over head view of the track, so you can see what's coming up. It works fine when you want to take the time to preplan your course. It's useless for navigation once you're out riding around.
I just use my phone when I get lost but there are plenty of people using those larger garmins, hopefully somebody will have some specific feedback for you.
If you want one that functions like your car GPS you need the big dog (700s or 800s should all do it) and you can input an address, and you'll get turn cues and a nice display.
The 500 has a very rudimentary navigation system - it's a true GPS but there's no address entry or even any maps. What you CAN do is create a track in say, ridewithgps.com, output the tcx file to garmin training center (software for your PC) and then upload the guidance to your garmin 500 or 510. You do get turn by turn navigation that way, although it tends to tell me to turn right as I'm missing the turn. You can also look at an over head view of the track, so you can see what's coming up. It works fine when you want to take the time to preplan your course. It's useless for navigation once you're out riding around.
I just use my phone when I get lost but there are plenty of people using those larger garmins, hopefully somebody will have some specific feedback for you.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: SoCal
Posts: 305
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Zen, Garmin just announced replacements to the Edge 800 and 500 (the 810 and 510) at the CES a few weeks ago.
https://www.pocket-lint.com/news/4904...ycle-computers
If you are still thinking about Red, I saved for a build kit, rather than buying part by part. Like auto parts, you get raked over the coals if you try and buy it piece by piece. Colorado Cyclist, Competitive Cyclist, Jenson, etc. all sell build kits and gruppos that are significantly cheaper than buying each part individually. I hated the delayed gratification, but when I added up the price difference, I realized I couldn't just throw that money away.
https://www.pocket-lint.com/news/4904...ycle-computers
If you are still thinking about Red, I saved for a build kit, rather than buying part by part. Like auto parts, you get raked over the coals if you try and buy it piece by piece. Colorado Cyclist, Competitive Cyclist, Jenson, etc. all sell build kits and gruppos that are significantly cheaper than buying each part individually. I hated the delayed gratification, but when I added up the price difference, I realized I couldn't just throw that money away.
#13
#5639
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,206
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
Ive always wanted red.But you know what,my lbs says im wasting my money.I have to respect such honesty.I realize im not a racer and i dont have the feel to even notice as i rode an all red bike yesterday and i couldn't feel any difference.Your point is well taken and that money could be used for a Garmin.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bbqpork
Road Cycling
26
02-25-15 04:05 PM