My friend and I are planning to ride our bikes between San Diego and San Francisco this May or June. My question is whether I should do SD to SF or SF to SD in this trip.
About us: I only have a time window of 2 weeks (maybe a few more days at most if I have to) for vacation, so it is better to be done in that amount of time. I personally had some experience of biking 100 miles+ per day for three days in the past, but there were no big hills on the road and it was five years ago. My friend has been training for the trip for some time, but with limited experience of long distance biking before.
I learned that there would be "strong winds prevailing from north to south" along the Pacific coast in the summer, so it seemed it would be easier to bike from SF to SD. However, both of us prefer ending the trip in SF instead. This question may seem a little loose, but could anyone give me an estimate how much longer (in days) it will take to bike from SD to SF than from SF to SD? Thanks!