Building a cheap Tandem.
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Building a cheap Tandem.
Hi Guys,
I'm looking at a cheap tandem frame locally to me, I'm wondering if it is feasible and safe to build a cheap bike?
My main Question is about brakes and wheels.
Will standard wheels and rim brakes be acceptable to ride on? This won't be a heavily used Tandem, no epic trips with luggage just something for my Girlfriend and I to have a bit of fun on. I understand the problem with rim brakes on tandems is the heat, will this be an issue with light usage? How much heat does it take for things to go wrong? Also wheels, will standard 36 spoke wheels be strong enough for a combined 27st?
I'm looking at a cheap tandem frame locally to me, I'm wondering if it is feasible and safe to build a cheap bike?
My main Question is about brakes and wheels.
Will standard wheels and rim brakes be acceptable to ride on? This won't be a heavily used Tandem, no epic trips with luggage just something for my Girlfriend and I to have a bit of fun on. I understand the problem with rim brakes on tandems is the heat, will this be an issue with light usage? How much heat does it take for things to go wrong? Also wheels, will standard 36 spoke wheels be strong enough for a combined 27st?
#2
Uber Goober
There are a lot of variables involved.
Typically, a higher-grade "cheap" tandem means an older model. They may use 7-8 speed instead of 9-10-11 speed. I understand some of the older tandems tended to have the riders closer together; ie, a shorter rear cockpit. You could potentially wind up replacing quite a few parts to get it into good riding order. And, they may use parts that aren't readily available now. But, if it worked great 10 years ago, there's mostly not any reason it can't work great now.
The rim brake issue doesn't seem to be a big issue unless you have big hills or mountain descents. You might do better to check with some local riders and see what their experiences are. From the "27st", I deduce you're probably not from north Texas! One of the local high-mileage guys uses rim brakes with a rear disk drag brake (which he seldom uses on local rides.) That also assumes you have good rim brakes in the first place.
Typically, a higher-grade "cheap" tandem means an older model. They may use 7-8 speed instead of 9-10-11 speed. I understand some of the older tandems tended to have the riders closer together; ie, a shorter rear cockpit. You could potentially wind up replacing quite a few parts to get it into good riding order. And, they may use parts that aren't readily available now. But, if it worked great 10 years ago, there's mostly not any reason it can't work great now.
The rim brake issue doesn't seem to be a big issue unless you have big hills or mountain descents. You might do better to check with some local riders and see what their experiences are. From the "27st", I deduce you're probably not from north Texas! One of the local high-mileage guys uses rim brakes with a rear disk drag brake (which he seldom uses on local rides.) That also assumes you have good rim brakes in the first place.
__________________
"be careful this rando stuff is addictive and dan's the 'pusher'."
"be careful this rando stuff is addictive and dan's the 'pusher'."
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ft Worth, TX
Posts: 1,971
Bikes: Custom 650B tandem by Bob Brown, 650B tandem converted from Santana Arriva, Santana Noventa, Boulder Bicycle 700C, Gunnar Sport
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
These are a little dated but still a lot of good information including on components:
Tandem Bicycle articles by Sheldon Brown -- Harris Cyclery
Tandem Bike FAQ
Tandem Bicycle articles by Sheldon Brown -- Harris Cyclery
Tandem Bike FAQ
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Wind Tunnels of Cheyenne
Posts: 361
Bikes: Burley Duet [of some unknown year] (the guinea pig); 2001 Ventana ECDM (the project); And always one less than I think I really need.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Depends on your terrain and how fast you are traveling (energy = mass * speed squared), so if you're spending most of your time in the neighborhoods and bike paths rim brakes shouldn't be a problem as long as they are adjusted and in good condition. 27st [378lbs] should be okay on the 36 spoke wheels if they are of quality build, but 40 or 48 would probably be better. Also, if you are starting from scratch with the frame, you will probably need a tandem-specific wheel (the tandem rear spacings are normally wider).
Hi Guys,
I'm looking at a cheap tandem frame locally to me, I'm wondering if it is feasible and safe to build a cheap bike?
My main Question is about brakes and wheels.
Will standard wheels and rim brakes be acceptable to ride on? This won't be a heavily used Tandem, no epic trips with luggage just something for my Girlfriend and I to have a bit of fun on. I understand the problem with rim brakes on tandems is the heat, will this be an issue with light usage? How much heat does it take for things to go wrong? Also wheels, will standard 36 spoke wheels be strong enough for a combined 27st?
I'm looking at a cheap tandem frame locally to me, I'm wondering if it is feasible and safe to build a cheap bike?
My main Question is about brakes and wheels.
Will standard wheels and rim brakes be acceptable to ride on? This won't be a heavily used Tandem, no epic trips with luggage just something for my Girlfriend and I to have a bit of fun on. I understand the problem with rim brakes on tandems is the heat, will this be an issue with light usage? How much heat does it take for things to go wrong? Also wheels, will standard 36 spoke wheels be strong enough for a combined 27st?
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Machias, WA
Posts: 718
Bikes: Rodriguez Toucan tandem, Rodriguez Rainer Lite sport/touring
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Safe? Sure. Cheap? Probably not. If you want cheap and all you need is a neighborhood cruiser, I would urge you to watch Craiglist or somewhere for a cheap complete tandem.
#6
pedallin' my life away
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Ohio
Posts: 145
Bikes: handbuilt tandem from Santana tubeset, 1976 Le Grangot frame road bike, Montague biframe folding mtn bike, rebuilt Schwinn Twin Doo-Dah tandem, garage-built beater recumbent
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
1) 1980's Santana- "real tandem" for "serious rides"
2) 1960's Schwinn Twinn, but with recent mountain bike wheels (36 spoke), brakes, + gears -- we use this around town and "ice cream rides" and just bumming around and having fun.
(me + wife = ~300 lbs = 21-22 stone)
Brakes- I think you should be absolutely fine with rim brakes. Heat isn't likely to be an issue until or unless you're on LONG, STEEP downhills --- like in the range of >5% grade for >3 miles. If you want more braking power, try the new softer brake pads- KoolStop Salmon have worked amazingly well for us- TONS of stopping power- way more than we need on the "serious bike." We used to have a drum brake but we took it off cuz we have lots more stopping power than we need.
Wheels- I scavenged regular 36-spoke mountain bike wheels from somebody's else trash on the curb, to upgrade our old Schwinn Twinn from its original single-speed wheels. Granted you have a bit more weight on the bike than we do, but if you're just cruising around town or on bike paths or canal towpaths or something like that, they will likely do fine. I think it's very unlikely you'd suffer catastrophic failure that'd mean significant risk of injury. If a wheel like this isn't enough for you, I think the most likely failure mode be more broken spokes than you care to deal with -- rather than a wheel just collapsing underneath you and putting you in danger.
The rear spacing of the frame might be wider than regular mountain bike wheels. One way to deal with this is to "cold form" the frame to narrower spacing. Cold forming = bending. If you're comfortable with that. You have to make sure you bend both sides in parallel, not one side more and one side less. You can do this with strings from the head tube to the dropouts- keep it symmetrical. Another option is to put a longer axle into the hub, and stack nuts to widen it. This is of course not ideal but it's often adequate for "around the town" and keeping the cash outlay low.
More than anything else, I'd say figure something out, and get out and TRY it out. Get out and have fun. You can always invest more $$ (or pounds sterling) into it later, if you're so inclined and finances allow. But I'd say whatever you do, you don't have to spend a whole lot of time getting things perfect (tho there's nothing wrong with that if that's fun). When you were a kid, you might have put a friend on the back or front of your bike and rode around with that 2nd person... most likely nothing terrible happened.
Have fun!
#7
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My own views from 10,000 miles on our tandems-
1) 1980's Santana- "real tandem" for "serious rides"
2) 1960's Schwinn Twinn, but with recent mountain bike wheels (36 spoke), brakes, + gears -- we use this around town and "ice cream rides" and just bumming around and having fun.
(me + wife = ~300 lbs = 21-22 stone)
Brakes- I think you should be absolutely fine with rim brakes. Heat isn't likely to be an issue until or unless you're on LONG, STEEP downhills --- like in the range of >5% grade for >3 miles. If you want more braking power, try the new softer brake pads- KoolStop Salmon have worked amazingly well for us- TONS of stopping power- way more than we need on the "serious bike." We used to have a drum brake but we took it off cuz we have lots more stopping power than we need.
Wheels- I scavenged regular 36-spoke mountain bike wheels from somebody's else trash on the curb, to upgrade our old Schwinn Twinn from its original single-speed wheels. Granted you have a bit more weight on the bike than we do, but if you're just cruising around town or on bike paths or canal towpaths or something like that, they will likely do fine. I think it's very unlikely you'd suffer catastrophic failure that'd mean significant risk of injury. If a wheel like this isn't enough for you, I think the most likely failure mode be more broken spokes than you care to deal with -- rather than a wheel just collapsing underneath you and putting you in danger.
The rear spacing of the frame might be wider than regular mountain bike wheels. One way to deal with this is to "cold form" the frame to narrower spacing. Cold forming = bending. If you're comfortable with that. You have to make sure you bend both sides in parallel, not one side more and one side less. You can do this with strings from the head tube to the dropouts- keep it symmetrical. Another option is to put a longer axle into the hub, and stack nuts to widen it. This is of course not ideal but it's often adequate for "around the town" and keeping the cash outlay low.
More than anything else, I'd say figure something out, and get out and TRY it out. Get out and have fun. You can always invest more $$ (or pounds sterling) into it later, if you're so inclined and finances allow. But I'd say whatever you do, you don't have to spend a whole lot of time getting things perfect (tho there's nothing wrong with that if that's fun). When you were a kid, you might have put a friend on the back or front of your bike and rode around with that 2nd person... most likely nothing terrible happened.
Have fun!
1) 1980's Santana- "real tandem" for "serious rides"
2) 1960's Schwinn Twinn, but with recent mountain bike wheels (36 spoke), brakes, + gears -- we use this around town and "ice cream rides" and just bumming around and having fun.
(me + wife = ~300 lbs = 21-22 stone)
Brakes- I think you should be absolutely fine with rim brakes. Heat isn't likely to be an issue until or unless you're on LONG, STEEP downhills --- like in the range of >5% grade for >3 miles. If you want more braking power, try the new softer brake pads- KoolStop Salmon have worked amazingly well for us- TONS of stopping power- way more than we need on the "serious bike." We used to have a drum brake but we took it off cuz we have lots more stopping power than we need.
Wheels- I scavenged regular 36-spoke mountain bike wheels from somebody's else trash on the curb, to upgrade our old Schwinn Twinn from its original single-speed wheels. Granted you have a bit more weight on the bike than we do, but if you're just cruising around town or on bike paths or canal towpaths or something like that, they will likely do fine. I think it's very unlikely you'd suffer catastrophic failure that'd mean significant risk of injury. If a wheel like this isn't enough for you, I think the most likely failure mode be more broken spokes than you care to deal with -- rather than a wheel just collapsing underneath you and putting you in danger.
The rear spacing of the frame might be wider than regular mountain bike wheels. One way to deal with this is to "cold form" the frame to narrower spacing. Cold forming = bending. If you're comfortable with that. You have to make sure you bend both sides in parallel, not one side more and one side less. You can do this with strings from the head tube to the dropouts- keep it symmetrical. Another option is to put a longer axle into the hub, and stack nuts to widen it. This is of course not ideal but it's often adequate for "around the town" and keeping the cash outlay low.
More than anything else, I'd say figure something out, and get out and TRY it out. Get out and have fun. You can always invest more $$ (or pounds sterling) into it later, if you're so inclined and finances allow. But I'd say whatever you do, you don't have to spend a whole lot of time getting things perfect (tho there's nothing wrong with that if that's fun). When you were a kid, you might have put a friend on the back or front of your bike and rode around with that 2nd person... most likely nothing terrible happened.
Have fun!
#8
Nigel
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,991
Bikes: 1980s and 1990s steel: CyclePro, Nishiki, Schwinn, SR, Trek........
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 384 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
We're a 500+lbs team; and do fine with 40 spoke Velocity Dyad rims. A well built set of wheels with 36 spokes per should be fine for you, especially with wider moderate pressure tires. Smaller diameter wheels are stronger than larger - and generally a bit less expensive. We have Avid SD5 "V-brakes" (rim) on our T50 - they are very effective.
#9
Still learning
My own views from 10,000 miles on our tandems-
1) 1980's Santana- "real tandem" for "serious rides"
2) 1960's Schwinn Twinn, but with recent mountain bike wheels (36 spoke), brakes, + gears -- we use this around town and "ice cream rides" and just bumming around and having fun.
(me + wife = ~300 lbs = 21-22 stone)
Brakes- I think you should be absolutely fine with rim brakes. Heat isn't likely to be an issue until or unless you're on LONG, STEEP downhills --- like in the range of >5% grade for >3 miles. If you want more braking power, try the new softer brake pads- KoolStop Salmon have worked amazingly well for us- TONS of stopping power- way more than we need on the "serious bike." We used to have a drum brake but we took it off cuz we have lots more stopping power than we need.
Wheels- I scavenged regular 36-spoke mountain bike wheels from somebody's else trash on the curb, to upgrade our old Schwinn Twinn from its original single-speed wheels. Granted you have a bit more weight on the bike than we do, but if you're just cruising around town or on bike paths or canal towpaths or something like that, they will likely do fine. I think it's very unlikely you'd suffer catastrophic failure that'd mean significant risk of injury. If a wheel like this isn't enough for you, I think the most likely failure mode be more broken spokes than you care to deal with -- rather than a wheel just collapsing underneath you and putting you in danger.
The rear spacing of the frame might be wider than regular mountain bike wheels. One way to deal with this is to "cold form" the frame to narrower spacing. Cold forming = bending. If you're comfortable with that. You have to make sure you bend both sides in parallel, not one side more and one side less. You can do this with strings from the head tube to the dropouts- keep it symmetrical. Another option is to put a longer axle into the hub, and stack nuts to widen it. This is of course not ideal but it's often adequate for "around the town" and keeping the cash outlay low.
Have fun!
1) 1980's Santana- "real tandem" for "serious rides"
2) 1960's Schwinn Twinn, but with recent mountain bike wheels (36 spoke), brakes, + gears -- we use this around town and "ice cream rides" and just bumming around and having fun.
(me + wife = ~300 lbs = 21-22 stone)
Brakes- I think you should be absolutely fine with rim brakes. Heat isn't likely to be an issue until or unless you're on LONG, STEEP downhills --- like in the range of >5% grade for >3 miles. If you want more braking power, try the new softer brake pads- KoolStop Salmon have worked amazingly well for us- TONS of stopping power- way more than we need on the "serious bike." We used to have a drum brake but we took it off cuz we have lots more stopping power than we need.
Wheels- I scavenged regular 36-spoke mountain bike wheels from somebody's else trash on the curb, to upgrade our old Schwinn Twinn from its original single-speed wheels. Granted you have a bit more weight on the bike than we do, but if you're just cruising around town or on bike paths or canal towpaths or something like that, they will likely do fine. I think it's very unlikely you'd suffer catastrophic failure that'd mean significant risk of injury. If a wheel like this isn't enough for you, I think the most likely failure mode be more broken spokes than you care to deal with -- rather than a wheel just collapsing underneath you and putting you in danger.
The rear spacing of the frame might be wider than regular mountain bike wheels. One way to deal with this is to "cold form" the frame to narrower spacing. Cold forming = bending. If you're comfortable with that. You have to make sure you bend both sides in parallel, not one side more and one side less. You can do this with strings from the head tube to the dropouts- keep it symmetrical. Another option is to put a longer axle into the hub, and stack nuts to widen it. This is of course not ideal but it's often adequate for "around the town" and keeping the cash outlay low.
Have fun!
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 11,016
Bikes: Custom Zona c/f tandem + Scott Plasma single
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 77 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 19 Times
in
11 Posts
We are absolutely fine with rim rakes on our tandems. Live and ride in the southwest USA with lots of hills and mountains.
Have climbed/descended up to over 9,000 foot elevation. Did 7% grade for 11 miles (Kitt Peak in Arizona) with just Mafac cantilever brakes on tandem.
We are rather light tandem duo (just under 250 lbs).
Yes, at your weight an older quality tandem with 40 or 48 spoked wheels would do just fine with good quality pads for braking.
"Cheap' does not hold up as well as 'quality'.
Picture #1 is our current custom Zona tandem with over 40,000 miles on the odometer with rim brakes. Our Co-Motion tandem before that we logged 56,000 miles.
Rudy and Kay/zonatandem
Have climbed/descended up to over 9,000 foot elevation. Did 7% grade for 11 miles (Kitt Peak in Arizona) with just Mafac cantilever brakes on tandem.
We are rather light tandem duo (just under 250 lbs).
Yes, at your weight an older quality tandem with 40 or 48 spoked wheels would do just fine with good quality pads for braking.
"Cheap' does not hold up as well as 'quality'.
Picture #1 is our current custom Zona tandem with over 40,000 miles on the odometer with rim brakes. Our Co-Motion tandem before that we logged 56,000 miles.
Rudy and Kay/zonatandem
#11
pedallin' my life away
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Ohio
Posts: 145
Bikes: handbuilt tandem from Santana tubeset, 1976 Le Grangot frame road bike, Montague biframe folding mtn bike, rebuilt Schwinn Twin Doo-Dah tandem, garage-built beater recumbent
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#12
pedallin' my life away
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Ohio
Posts: 145
Bikes: handbuilt tandem from Santana tubeset, 1976 Le Grangot frame road bike, Montague biframe folding mtn bike, rebuilt Schwinn Twin Doo-Dah tandem, garage-built beater recumbent
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Here's a bunch of pictures from my Twinn - hopefully it helps. Notes -
First rebuild ~1980:
- put it on 27" wheels - there were no 26"/MTB wheels back then. R wheel had a 5-speed Sturmey-Archer internal hub.
- The fork you see in these pic's is for a 27" wheel, hence longer than I'd want, if I were to replace again it today.
2nd rebuild ~2005:
- put it onto MTB wheels picked off the curb. (By now, not a matched pair- R is steel, F is aluminum.)
- brazed studs onto it for cantilever brakes.
- spread the R dropouts (cold-formed = bent) to fit the wider axle for 7-speed freewheel + derailleur.
- stoker crank is a MTB triple off another trash-picked bike - by a minor miracle, it fit the bottom bracket perfectly. I removed the inner ring from the MTB, and bolted the Twinn's timing chainring on there in its place. The limit screws on the F derailleur keep the shifting chain away from the timing chain.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ghoundz
Tandem Cycling
4
12-22-12 12:58 AM