Upgrading a Santana Sovereign to 10-speed
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 106
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Upgrading a Santana Sovereign to 10-speed
I have a Santana Sovereign from ~2001 that I'd like to upgrade to 10-speed (it currently has 9-speed Ultegra). I'm not so much looking for the extra gear as I am a more comfortable hood shape on the brake levers. I have a few options I'm considering; I'd be glad for your opinions on them or other suggestions!
Option 1: Shimano 6703
The most straightforward option would seem to be buying a pair of Ultegra triple shifters, a new front and rear derailleur, and a chain and cassette, although Zinn says that the existing RD should be fine.
Pros: standard setup, possibility of installing a FlightDeck computer.
Cons: last generation components, potentially balky triple shifting.
Does anyone have experience with 5703 (105) vs 6703 (Ultegra) shifters? Are Ultegra worth the extra $75 or so?
Option 2: SRAM Rival
Alternatively, I could install a right-hand SRAM Rival lever, a brake-only left-hand lever, and use a barend shifter to shift the front derailleur. (I'd need a chain, cassette, and rear derailleur as well.)
Pros: barend shifter simplifies front shifting.
Cons: barend shifter for front shifting.
Option 3: Your suggestions
What am I not thinking about?
Thanks!
Daniel
Option 1: Shimano 6703
The most straightforward option would seem to be buying a pair of Ultegra triple shifters, a new front and rear derailleur, and a chain and cassette, although Zinn says that the existing RD should be fine.
Pros: standard setup, possibility of installing a FlightDeck computer.
Cons: last generation components, potentially balky triple shifting.
Does anyone have experience with 5703 (105) vs 6703 (Ultegra) shifters? Are Ultegra worth the extra $75 or so?
Option 2: SRAM Rival
Alternatively, I could install a right-hand SRAM Rival lever, a brake-only left-hand lever, and use a barend shifter to shift the front derailleur. (I'd need a chain, cassette, and rear derailleur as well.)
Pros: barend shifter simplifies front shifting.
Cons: barend shifter for front shifting.
Option 3: Your suggestions
What am I not thinking about?
Thanks!
Daniel
#2
pedallin' my life away
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Ohio
Posts: 145
Bikes: handbuilt tandem from Santana tubeset, 1976 Le Grangot frame road bike, Montague biframe folding mtn bike, rebuilt Schwinn Twin Doo-Dah tandem, garage-built beater recumbent
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
FWIW I've got 5703 (105's) on the tandem and 6703's (Ultegra) on the single bike and I can't tell the difference. They're both 9-sp tho.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,169
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
My 2007 Team Scandium came with 6703 shifters,FD and an XTR RD along with a 11-34 cassette and 7803 brakes.
First to go was the cassette for a 12-27 and FD to a dura-ace 7803 and 7803 RD.
Eventually went to a set of 7803 shifters so all would match.
Shifting on the 6703 was fine but the 7803 feels better. I imagine the Ultegra shifts better than the 105 also.
First to go was the cassette for a 12-27 and FD to a dura-ace 7803 and 7803 RD.
Eventually went to a set of 7803 shifters so all would match.
Shifting on the 6703 was fine but the 7803 feels better. I imagine the Ultegra shifts better than the 105 also.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,853
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1067 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 259 Times
in
153 Posts
It is obviously a personal thing but I much prefer the shape of the 9 speed (6500) hoods to the 6700. Actually I found 6700 to be the worst out of the recent Shimano models for shifting and comfort.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 11,016
Bikes: Custom Zona c/f tandem + Scott Plasma single
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 77 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 19 Times
in
11 Posts
Have used/tested STI, DI-2 and most other shifting systems in our 40+ years of tandeming, and guess what???
Went back to 9- speed bar end shifters. Easy to use, reliable, less hassle and no fidgeting and a heck of a lot less expen$ive!
Just our opinion and experience.
Pedal on!
Rudy and Kay/zonatandem
Went back to 9- speed bar end shifters. Easy to use, reliable, less hassle and no fidgeting and a heck of a lot less expen$ive!
Just our opinion and experience.
Pedal on!
Rudy and Kay/zonatandem
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,853
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1067 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 259 Times
in
153 Posts
Have used/tested STI, DI-2 and most other shifting systems in our 40+ years of tandeming, and guess what???
Went back to 9- speed bar end shifters. Easy to use, reliable, less hassle and no fidgeting and a heck of a lot less expen$ive!
Just our opinion and experience.
Pedal on!
Rudy and Kay/zonatandem
Went back to 9- speed bar end shifters. Easy to use, reliable, less hassle and no fidgeting and a heck of a lot less expen$ive!
Just our opinion and experience.
Pedal on!
Rudy and Kay/zonatandem
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MTBaddict
Bicycle Mechanics
33
07-20-18 12:14 AM
JustinNY
Road Cycling
30
05-23-12 02:11 PM